Knights2729
Registered User
I fear you may be right. On the telecast they said the next televised game was this coming Tuesday against Guelph.
Glad I got tickets to Sunday's game
![Popcorn :popcorn: :popcorn:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/popcorn.gif)
I fear you may be right. On the telecast they said the next televised game was this coming Tuesday against Guelph.
Why didnt anyone stick up for the rook?
Individual milestones:
Raaymakers 30 wins ( 28 right now)
I would say that JR for sure gets his 30, Hanner gets his 50 and 100.....this should happen unless we fall off the face of the earth lolWhile not a textbook game Friday night, at least Hamilton played worse then we did. I figure we go 7 - 3 in the last 10 games on a difficult close out schedule.
Rayzor will get his 30 wins but probably fall short of the 7 wins he needs for 3rd overall.
Hancock will finish with 51 goals.
Turko has a role and plays it to a tee.We gotta do something about Turko out there. He’s a static player that lacks hockey sense. His vision is up and down and he won’t ever look yet alone pass across the ice. His hands are not up to an OHL level either. He needs to start making plays instead up skating up and down one side of the ice and dumping the puck in. Pucks deep is one thing but multiple missed backdoor chances at crucial moments is another. Limit his minutes or work with him on developing his hockey sense because you can’t score from shooting it into the corner. Except for his last goal I guess.
But that Russian kid Guskov. Wow. He is quite the show. I mean I said good game to him once and he said “nice, you?”, kinda threw me off but anyways he’s a weapon out their a mini ovechkin. The way he can move the puck and his elusiveness is just superb. Tell the trainer to get him a can of coke on the bench and dictionary because we have a Russian superstar in the making!
We gotta do something about Turko out there. He’s a static player that lacks hockey sense. His vision is up and down and he won’t ever look yet alone pass across the ice. His hands are not up to an OHL level either. He needs to start making plays instead up skating up and down one side of the ice and dumping the puck in. Pucks deep is one thing but multiple missed backdoor chances at crucial moments is another. Limit his minutes or work with him on developing his hockey sense because you can’t score from shooting it into the corner. Except for his last goal I guess.
But that Russian kid Guskov. Wow. He is quite the show. I mean I said good game to him once and he said “nice, you?”, kinda threw me off but anyways he’s a weapon out their a mini ovechkin. The way he can move the puck and his elusiveness is just superb. Tell the trainer to get him a can of coke on the bench and dictionary because we have a Russian superstar in the making!
exactly PPTurko has a role and plays it to a tee.
I like the kid..have since midget. He's not flashy but that's not his game. He grinds...fore-checks(one of the best on the team) and just does what's asked of him. Excellent PK guy and shot blocker tooexactly PP
management loves Turko. Simpson was on a pod cast were he said Turko is the guy who will do whatever is asked of him he also holds himself accountable and buys into the game plan.
imo Turko plays checking role perfectly he may not get to the next level but he has a role on this team.
A few other players on this team could learn a thing or two from Turko![]()
Lets replace him with another 150lb midget who can skate fast.Turko has a role and plays it to a tee.
The downside is plays die on his stick constantly. He hinders the offensive ability of those around him. I sit in 310 for every game and it happens consistently. Playing him with the rookies is a mistake as he has limited offensive vision. Dunkley played that role well.I like the kid..have since midget. He's not flashy but that's not his game. He grinds...fore-checks(one of the best on the team) and just does what's asked of him. Excellent PK guy and shot blocker too
Exactly. As long as he plays a checking role on the 4th line, I'm ok with Turko. I don't like it when he plays on a line with skilled players because then he becomes a liability--i.e. cannot generate any offence with Turko.Turko has a role and plays it to a tee.
Plays die on #80's and #18's stick more as well as others...should we relegate them all to the bench? Bigger issues with this team than the odd play dying on #12's stick. I sit in 309...perhaps I see more from my seatThe downside is plays die on his stick constantly. He hinders the offensive ability of those around him. I sit in 310 for every game and it happens consistently. Playing him with the rookies is a mistake as he has limited offensive vision. Dunkley played that role well.
Plays die on #80's and #18's stick more as well as others...should we relegate them all to the bench? Bigger issues with this team than the odd play dying on #12's stick. ...![]()
The downside is plays die on his stick constantly. He hinders the offensive ability of those around him. I sit in 310 for every game and it happens consistently. Playing him with the rookies is a mistake as he has limited offensive vision. Dunkley played that role well.
I think Matvey Guskov deserves a leadership role on the team. He’s got a good heart for the game and from what google translate told me I think he said he would do anything for any player on that team. We don’t need stuck up so called leaders with chips on their shoulders to what lead the team to cockiness? No I think Matvey Guskov should be captain for his work ethic and the tenacity he brings to every game.
But in all fairness his English needs to become a lot better before this is even considered.
This board is crazy, nothing wrong with Turko. Yes Bouchard has not been sharp but you live and die by your best players, and he is the knights best player by far.... he deserves the C
The “C” has nothing to do with skill though. It’s about leadership on and off the ice and he displays none of that. Just because you’re the best player does not give you the right to earn the “C”. It’s a privelage and not a right.