ForestCityHky
Registered User
- Feb 15, 2018
- 326
- 341
Nice coaching Shane Hunter.Hunter finally took my advice and put Regula in front of the goalie on the PP.
Oh Regula scores in the front of the net on the PP.
Size size size
Nice coaching Shane Hunter.Hunter finally took my advice and put Regula in front of the goalie on the PP.
Oh Regula scores in the front of the net on the PP.
6-3 Knights over the Attack
40 shots on goals
Still play soft to start third period
2pts over the Storms and one over Ottawa
I'd have to say it was a good nights for London
I've said it before and I'll say it again...Foudy and Formenton should not be on the same line
The McMichael line is a given...it's the only line that has really given us legit consistency since September. I did like Hancock with Foudy and Tymkin, yes we know Tymkin sits for 5..but Formenton isn't the logical slot in, it has to be a player that plays the corners and wall as well as Tymkin. (I.E. Cotter)The Knights have 2 lines that have shown great chemistry.
McMicheal, Dunkley, Guskov
Hancock, Foudy, Tymkin
I would like to see them keep those 2 lines together, leaving a line of say Cotter, Formenton and Moskal, Nelson, or Stranges. Preferably the latter.
The McMichael line is a given...it's the only line that has really given us legit consistency since September. I did like Hancock with Foudy and Tymkin, yes we know Tymkin sits for 5..but Formenton isn't the logical slot in, it has to be a player that plays the corners and wall as well as Tymkin. (I.E. Cotter)
when Tymkin comes back they have to put that line back together and really slot Formenton down a bit. I know it sounds odd, but you don't force chemistry and they've done it routinely by trying Foudy and Formenton together dating back to last season. They just don't compliment each other and actually render their line useless when together.
Guskov/Dunkley/McMichael
Foudy/Hancock/Tymkin
Stranges/Cotter/Formenton
Nelson/Moskal/Turko
...it just makes the most sense
The McMichael line is a given...it's the only line that has really given us legit consistency since September. I did like Hancock with Foudy and Tymkin, yes we know Tymkin sits for 5..but Formenton isn't the logical slot in, it has to be a player that plays the corners and wall as well as Tymkin. (I.E. Cotter)
when Tymkin comes back they have to put that line back together and really slot Formenton down a bit. I know it sounds odd, but you don't force chemistry and they've done it routinely by trying Foudy and Formenton together dating back to last season. They just don't compliment each other and actually render their line useless when together.
Guskov/Dunkley/McMichael
Foudy/Hancock/Tymkin
Stranges/Cotter/Formenton
Nelson/Moskal/Turko
...it just makes the most sense
I've said it before and I'll say it again...Foudy and Formenton should not be on the same line
Was wondering that myself - outside of Tymkin they don't have size or grit up front so guess Dale figured use one of the d'men for net front presence. Really hadn't been working ....Why are we still employing three defencemen on the PP..... yes Regula got the goal but I have to think the three best forwards would be the best approach
His suspension has begun...missed last night's game--my understanding is 5 games (could be wrong).Why would the league take so long to announce a suspension if one is indeed comming to tymkin.
Nope...he got 5 games. Was an automatic 3 so the league really doesn't have to make an announcementHis suspension has begun...missed last night's game--my understanding is 5 games (could be wrong).
Ol nothing on the ohl websiteHis suspension has begun...missed last night's game--my understanding is 5 games (could be wrong).
And who,s fault is that ?f - outside of Tymkin they don't have size or grit up front ....
And who,s fault is that ?
Yup that one is on Hunter and his posse.