Garbageyuk
Registered User
- Dec 19, 2016
- 6,895
- 8,329
I’m rooting for him, that’s for sure. But things have not gone well.I'm a fan of Reinbacher and believer in his future value to the Habs but he certainly hasn't outplayed Mailloux in Laval.
I’m rooting for him, that’s for sure. But things have not gone well.I'm a fan of Reinbacher and believer in his future value to the Habs but he certainly hasn't outplayed Mailloux in Laval.
Do we have to protect Mailloux next fall?I've watched every single Laval Rocket game the last couple of seasons, and I disagree with you on this.
I personally think David Reinbacher has been Laval's best defenseman basically every game he's played in the AHL, and that he's much more pro-ready than Mailloux
But that doesn't mean I think Logan Mailloux is a bad prospect too, because he isn't.
Just, I've seen fairly little progress defensively from Mailloux this season and that plateau-ing is the opposite of what you want to see in a young prospect.
Development isn't linear, and maybe next season Mailloux takes giant strides forward. But for now I think Mailloux still has work to put in to get his defensive game in order before he sees a lot of NHL icetime.
We don't want Mailloux to "Barron it", and basically flatline his progression because of early-NHL time and trying to cling to his NHL paycheck some way, somehow.
I'd much rather we graduate Reinbacher next season, whilst giving Mailloux even more minutes next year in the AHL, PKing and eating the most minutes he can defensively so that he'd be ready to integrate the NHL team for 2026-2027.
Do we have to protect Mailloux next fall?
Development of young players has alot twists and turns for sure.
Nope, he is waivers-exempt as he is still on his ELC and hasn't played enough NHL games to clear the threshold.
Mailloux was being a dick so they kicked him out of the game. The referee even tell him he can't do that.Is there really anything in there that warrants being kicked from a game?
That's a good question to debate. We know Rein and Mailloux have long term value, or 86% sure, we would love to keep them, Habs will find usage for them, but how they are valued around the league to match the value of a Beniers for example. On the 31 other teams, how many 'Rein and Mailloux' type of d prospects are available in such a trade? Are we overating our prospects cuz we sincerely beleive they are better than other teams sh*ts. sorry, promising prospects?They need to keep both Rein and Mailloux unless they have an opportunity for a home run trade (beniers or mctavish).
The need for redundancy is obvious as they both still come with question marks.
To be clear, I don’t think a trade would be 1-for-1.That's a good question to debate. We know Rein and Mailloux have long term value, or 86% sure, we would love to keep them, Habs will find usage for them, but how they are valued around the league to match the value of a Beniers for example. On the 31 other teams, how many 'Rein and Mailloux' type of d prospects are available in such a trade? Are we overating our prospects cuz we sincerely beleive they are better than other teams sh*ts. sorry, promising prospects?
How this board value our prospects vs how scouts around the league value our prospects? It's like when you want to sell your house and you think of an high price vs the real value on the market.
If you are talking about Reinbacher it would be 1 for 1 or the other team adding.To be clear, I don’t think a trade would be 1-for-1.
They have a lot of potential but the risk would mean a significant piece would have to be included in a trade for a good young top 2 center.say with
Not if it’s Beniers.If you are talking about Reinbacher it would be 1 for 1 or the other team adding.
ABSOLUTELY!they do but to me you have to look at the entire season, as it's only been 6 playoff games so that's a small sample size. I like that this year the goals per game were up and he showed slight improvement in his defense. He had a drop in overall production but I hated how they handled him with the he's on PP1, he's off PP1, he's back on PP1, he's off PP1 again, repeat several times. How they thought putting Hoefenmayer over Mailloux on PP1 made zero sense to me. I know it was said they were trying to get him to work on his defense but how they handled just didn't make sense to me, in the end it only matters if it works though so we'll see when he gets more NHL games next year.
If M or Rein where LHD's then it's a different discussion. Right now, it's the only two RHDs that have potential to be in the top 6 and maybe top 4. If it means another season in the AHL or more tolerance to the mistakes that it's guaranteed they will make, so be it.Habs brass have to be careful with what they gonna do with their young D.
I would not want another McDonagh or Sergachev trade fiascos.
Better keep Mailloux and Reinbacher at AHL level if they feel they are not NHL ready.