Prospect Info: Logan Mailloux Part 3 The Only Hockey Talk Thread

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,743
30,560
Montreal
One of the two of his biggest problems can develop in the AHL. His constant butt-on-ice visits. He needs to develop his balance because he loses a lot of the one-on-one.

His defensive decision making and positioning would be far better off with a vet defensive partner. We have none to give him in the AHL or the NHL

As for trading Savard. If you asked me in August, I was thrilled, ask me now and I'm not trading him for anything. We are woefully on quality defensive play and we would be worse off without Savard.

Maybe everything changes IF...IF we get a top notch defensive coach teaching the young ones the finer points of defensive play.

Learning defence in the AHL will close the current gap a bit so he can learn better at the NHL level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

yianik

Registered User
Jun 30, 2009
11,149
6,714
With you overreactions, and mine, we could have lots of fun over beers watching this shitshow of a franchise in a pub
You two would get beat up mouthing off by people trying to cheer on the team.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Habs

A55P2

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
2,336
2,402
Québec, Québec
Mailloux was not expected to be a mainstay in the NHL right now.

He did show some things offensively and showed his weaknesses defensively, which is something everyone was already aware off.

His defensive game has evolved in the last year, so we can be optimistic it`s going to progress further. At this time last year, he was one of the worst D defensively in the AHL.
If what we saw was him improved I'm not exactly sure how that's a positive. He just feels unsafe out there at all time.
 

Hannibal

Fear the Weber
Feb 11, 2007
11,183
8,804
Ive no doubt in my mind this guy is our trade bait number 1 for a trade to improve either defence or forwards.
 

Deebs

Without you, everything falls apart
Feb 5, 2014
17,447
14,412
The kid has 6 games in the NHL. Some of you expect him to look like Scott niedermayer. Chill out
Also the fact he missed so much development time over the past couple of years. Let the kid marinate in Laval for the rest of the year and see how he does next camp. It's sad many fans are in such a rush to have prospect be a finished product or else they suck and should be traded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prettyisland

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,211
72,917
Texas
Also the fact he missed so much development time over the past couple of years. Let the kid marinate in Laval for the rest of the year and see how he does next camp. It's sad many fans are in such a rush to have prospect be a finished product or else they suck and should be traded.
Patience is not something in abundance when it comes to allowing young kids the time they need to develop.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,211
72,917
Texas
We all have PTSD from the Bergevin era.................patience is a tough one....we are a true piece of slow progress.
So is Logan Mailloux. Lots to learn, but I like his offensive instinct.
6'3 220 RD, gritty...there is alot to like.
I remember how bad Logan was defensively last season during the 1st game...it wasn't good. But what I noticed though was a significant difference from game 1 to game 72. Yes he still needs to play better defense but he has improved from a year ago in a big way. He is going to be a solid top 4D.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,852
12,732
Patience is not something in abundance when it comes to allowing young kids the time they need to develop.
The reality is that patience is not something in abundance in any form of human endeavor today. We live in an era of instant gratification. Hockey and its fans today are not immune from this dynamic.

Having been born during the Truman administration I perhaps have a different perspective. I can wait.
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,599
107,131
Halifax
He obviously needed way more development time on defense. It's why I kept getting baffled when Bouillon would push him as NHL ready.

I think the org finally got a douse of reality and expect next time that Lindstrom is the call up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: overlords

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,746
5,820
Visit site
6'3 220 RD, gritty...there is alot to like.
I remember how bad Logan was defensively last season during the 1st game...it wasn't good. But what I noticed though was a significant difference from game 1 to game 72. Yes he still needs to play better defense but he has improved from a year ago in a big way. He is going to be a solid top 4D.
The best i could dedcribe his first 10 games was...he was still playing junior hockey...in the AHL.

Over the years, we've lost so many kids to second rate development it scares me that we'll lose X and Mailman. Never get their potential out of them or trade them and see them flourish elsewhere.
 

yianik

Registered User
Jun 30, 2009
11,149
6,714
I would take the umbrella out of @Mrb1p shirley temple and stab them in the eyes!
LOL , sure but before that you would have stirred the passions.

Its a rough season so far. Xhekaj the Unicorn all of a sudden maybe not being able to fit in the top 6. A healthy Dach will anchor a good 2nd line and now he isnt the Dach of 2 years ago. Of course Laine and Reinbacher set the mood. And there were expectations this year so the Management is under fire. Etc.

I knew this was going to be a bit of a shake out year because the kids are getting in their playing time and decisions are being forced by competition and where we need to be in development. This year I wanted to see if Dach is a 2C, is Barron worth keeping, will Xhekaj and Struble take the next step, and will we get an idea of what we have with Hutson, are a few of the questions.

I am not hitting any panic buttons so early into this year , but by game 35-40 we will have answers to some questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,746
5,820
Visit site
We all have PTSD from the Bergevin era.................patience is a tough one....we are a true piece of slow progress.
So is Logan Mailloux. Lots to learn, but I like his offensive instinct.
I remember going to Hamilton to scout Komisarek. He would get beaten on the outside, he was mad at himself, he would come back to the bench and get brow beaten by Julien.

But nothing changed over a 50 game span.

I deliberatly sat behind the bench to see the reaction of the players to a bad mistake. Not once did someone go over and say snything to them.

At least i discovered that we had a potential quality center in Pleky that no one had high on their list.

Back to Komi, who and where exactly was the development? Certainly couldn't be the brow beating Julien.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

Garo

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
11,546
1,739
Montréal
Or the coaching is just more adequate? Some players need structure to perform.
There was an article yesterday in La Presse about how the defensive systems in both Laval and Montréal are identical, which would be very whatever... But Mailloux' comments there do not portray him in a good light. Unable to recognize they are the same systems - Vincent had to correct that after - and just spoke gibberish when asked about it.

To attempt to be somewhat fair to him, it's possible than some of it is just Montréal playing that bad to start the season, but he was way below par here and him saying these things doesn't really help his case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vokiel

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,150
12,362
There was an article yesterday in La Presse about how the defensive systems in both Laval and Montréal are identical, which would be very whatever... But Mailloux' comments there do not portray him in a good light. Unable to recognize they are the same systems - Vincent had to correct that after - and just spoke gibberish when asked about it.

To attempt to be somewhat fair to him, it's possible than some of it is just Montréal playing that bad to start the season, but he was way below par here and him saying these things doesn't really help his case.

He processes the game too slowly for the NHL and struggles to recognize his assignment.....pretty easy and obvious explanation.
 

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,687
4,262
Montréal
There was an article yesterday in La Presse about how the defensive systems in both Laval and Montréal are identical, which would be very whatever... But Mailloux' comments there do not portray him in a good light. Unable to recognize they are the same systems - Vincent had to correct that after - and just spoke gibberish when asked about it.

To attempt to be somewhat fair to him, it's possible than some of it is just Montréal playing that bad to start the season, but he was way below par here and him saying these things doesn't really help his case.
Well I'm with Logan here, it doesn't sound like a system, more like a philosophy. So there's going to be players lost in their own zones over it, simply because they don't have the same "zone" definition at the same time as their team mates. Basically what we're seeing in Montreal. (Newhook getting rammed by Savard for example) If it works better in Laval, it's probably because they simply don't follow it as religiously or because there's just better on ice communication.

It sounds like the players are saying there are no clean direction lines and it's causing issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79 and mdk

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad