Disgruntled Observer*
Guest
Would there have been the changes to the pension plan then? I think in the long run, Fehr did well by the PA. I doubt all the modifications and concessions that he negotiated could have been achieved back when the league still thought it could pressure the union into a deal.
To be honest... yes.
I think if Fehr approached Bettman about the October offer and said "We agree to a lot of this, but would like to discuss a better pension plan", Bettman would have been more than willing to listen.
Take a look at the October offer.
It's barely different!!!!
$43.9 million cap floor (as opposed to the crrent $44... big win there...)
First year cap of 70.2 million (exactly the same)
SIX YEAR DEAL (closer to what the players actually wanted)
REVENUE SHARING 200 MILLION (exactly the same)
$210 million make whole.
WHY THE **** WASN'T THAT NEGOTIATED ON?
IT'S ALMOST THE SAME CBA!!!!!!
Do the things the nhlpa won counter the money lost for almost half of this season?
I decided to start a new thread on this topic.
Last edited by a moderator: