Player Discussion Linus Ullmark (G)
- Thread starter AchtzehnBaby
- Start date
Hopefully he can show up against the Bruins on Saturday. The lack of urgency in his body language is frustrating. Give Forsberg the net until NYI and let Ullmark sort whatever he might be dealing with physically/mentally so he can show up against Boston.
We need him to be able to steal games on days we don't score that much
We need him to be able to steal games on days we don't score that much
coladin
Registered User
- Sep 18, 2009
- 11,978
- 4,736
He will be fine. He just needs to play
Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 67,086
- 52,750
lets hope so
I'm starting Forsberg the next game regardless and if he is really good again .. I will have a hard time not going back to him
The team did not play well enough to win and Ullmark did make some great stops but that 3rd goal (3-1 goal) can not go in.
Last edited:
frightenedinmatenum2
Registered User
The thing that annoys me the most about Ullmark playing badly is that I initially said that they should wait until January to sign him, to make sure he is a fit. Then when they signed him I flopped the other way and said they while I thought they should wait, I understand why they would get it done.
Now I feel like if I flip back to they should have waited it might hurt my credibility as one of the leading voices in the online Sens community.
Now I feel like if I flip back to they should have waited it might hurt my credibility as one of the leading voices in the online Sens community.
BonHoonLayneCornell
Registered User
I was all ready to go to bat for him until that 3rd one went in. Would rather not see that and he needs to be better. I'm sure he knows it as well as anyone.
jbeck5
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2009
- 16,766
- 3,624
I still have you on a pedestal and I am the sens community. Don't worry.
The 1st rounder they gave up was valuable. They were in a great situation to restock the prospect pool having 3 picks in the top 40 and it looks like they botched that great situation. I like Yak but Eliasson was a very questionable pick and looks 2 years away from being 2 years away and now they are paying Ullmark Forsberg AND Korpisalo a combined 10.3 mil with term.
We will have plenty of picks from selling off our core if we find ourselves at the bottom again. Trying to salvage the present day team is and was a better strategy than forcing our way to another 3 year retool imo.
Goaltending needed to be addressed. I think having Ullmark has helped Forsberg settle in and honestly even though Ullmark hasn’t been great, at least our goaltending isn’t a nightmare like last year. I’m sure he’ll be better moving forward.
BonHoonLayneCornell
Registered User
He will be fine - he will come back to his track record and mean sv%.
Super Cake
Registered User
- Jun 24, 2013
- 31,152
- 6,611
It seems like every f***ing goalie that comes here puts up shitty stats. Like we could have Shesterkin in net and he would have similar stats to Ullmark right now. Makes you miss Anderson.
Norris4Norris
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2022
- 449
- 316
He is the most expensive inflatable dummy ever. He can stand in front of a puck but he can not stop it from going through him.
BonHoonLayneCornell
Registered User
Ultimately, the team is going to live and die on this guy, so I say put him in there and run with it for a bit. The team needs to find its footing again and needs him to be as advertised.
Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 56,576
- 34,264
I heard that, but he played the first two, got injured, and since then have mostly alternated just like in Boston, I'm not sure what he's referring to by never been on and off like this his whole career.
I get the feeling they wanted to give him Buffalo and Boston because they're his old teams. Ideally he'd be playing more but he hasn't been playing his best.
