Rumor: Lightning trying to use draft picks to move bad contracts

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,586
11,493
Winnipeg
If a veteran really wanted to stay and shoot for 3, could they restructure their deal like in the NFL? I know it’s different because in the NFL the alternative is being released and getting no money, but conceptually is that possible?

Its possible, they could mutually agree to terminate contract. The player would have to pass through waivers first. Plus I'm sure the league would reject a new contract between Tampa and said player as cap circumvention
 

llamateizer

Registered User
Mar 16, 2007
13,718
6,841
Montreal
If a veteran really wanted to stay and shoot for 3, could they restructure their deal like in the NFL? I know it’s different because in the NFL the alternative is being released and getting no money, but conceptually is that possible?

Yes and no, they can mutually terminate the contract.

However, the player wouldn't be able to sign with the same team
 

theimmortal1

Registered User
Sep 26, 2020
788
595
Because those teams weren’t in a need to shed salary. With that’s said, you’re not getting a 1st and that’s a fact but what you can do is shed say Palat & Kilorn for say Rasmus Kupari and 3rd. That might be right around what I expect the market to be for Tampa’s guys.. again, leverage is not what your TBL have and it gets worse when Serg and Erik needs new contracts as does Point. You could move Stammer or McD but keep in mind the NMC and their age..
the good things is you guys will still be in the running for the SC the next two seasons before what many expect to be the start of their decline.

Whether or not a team has to shed salary doesn’t impact trade values except in extreme circumstances. Things are pretty much normal now. Teams have space. No team is going to purposefully hurt their own team just to spite the Bolts. That’s dumb. And the Bolts only need 1 team to get fair market value. They easily get top picks for Palat/Killorn/Gourde. Easily.

Seattle is different since they have the leverage that they get 1 player for free.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,670
17,105
Victoria
I would expect Tampa to try and get Seattle to take at least 2 of Johnson/Killorn/Gourde/Palat. You would think that would be the cheapest way for Tampa to get out of this mess. And Seattle have a couple skilled guys with that have chemistry.

Well they're going to lose Gourde to expansion...which is pretty bad to TB. He's a fringe 1st line calibre player and was their 3rd most used forward in the playoffs. Honestly I think he should be considered part of their "core" and it's gonna be a huge loss. One of the better two-way centers in the league.

Palat/Killorn are moveable without too much trouble. Basically right now Tampa is just trying to jump Johnson again.
 

theimmortal1

Registered User
Sep 26, 2020
788
595
Well they're going to lose Gourde to expansion...which is pretty bad to TB. He's a fringe 1st line calibre player and was their 3rd most used forward in the playoffs. Honestly I think he should be considered part of their "core" and it's gonna be a huge loss. One of the better two-way centers in the league.

Palat/Killorn are moveable without too much trouble. Basically right now Tampa is just trying to jump Johnson again.



If teams want too high of a pick for Johnson the Bolts will keep him and give him top 6 minutes. He will be a 20/30 player
 

Lightning1995

Registered User
May 16, 2016
4,099
1,619
I wonder if Vinik will have to sell ownership shares to the competition in order to entice teams to take on salary for top 6 Stanley cup champion quality forwards.

something to ponder
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussianGuyovich

r0bert8841

Registered User
Jan 2, 2009
7,636
770
Michigan
I wonder if Vinik will have to sell ownership shares to the competition in order to entice teams to take on salary for top 6 Stanley cup champion quality forwards.

something to ponder
That puts Tampa at an unfair advantage since their ownership shares are worth more than other team's due to the lack of taxes.
 

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,300
4,116
Las Vegas
Whether or not a team has to shed salary doesn’t impact trade values except in extreme circumstances. Things are pretty much normal now. Teams have space. No team is going to purposefully hurt their own team just to spite the Bolts. That’s dumb. And the Bolts only need 1 team to get fair market value. They easily get top picks for Palat/Killorn/Gourde. Easily.

Seattle is different since they have the leverage that they get 1 player for free.
Leverage is an extreme circumstance, you obviously don’t understand that. Are Palat/Kilorn/Gourde worth a 1st? Absolutely, especially in a normal year and even more so at the TDL. This isn’t that, while no team would hurt themselves they’re also going to try and likely succeed at screwing you over because you are the competition. How you not understand that is beyond me, those guys you have mentioned are now viewed as dumps! Look no further than Taransenko, TB is hoping Seattle snatched up one of the above to alleviate this issue but I think they go for Foote. I’m sure my Kings would love one or two of those guys but why would we pay anything near fair value? If we say we’d give you Rasmus Kupari and a 3rd for Palat and Kilorn do you say no?
 

Lightning1995

Registered User
May 16, 2016
4,099
1,619
Leverage is an extreme circumstance, you obviously don’t understand that. Are Palat/Kilorn/Gourde worth a 1st? Absolutely, especially in a normal year and even more so at the TDL. This isn’t that, while no team would hurt themselves they’re also going to try and likely succeed at screwing you over because you are the competition. How you not understand that is beyond me, those guys you have mentioned are now viewed as dumps! Look no further than Taransenko, TB is hoping Seattle snatched up one of the above to alleviate this issue but I think they go for Foote. I’m sure my Kings would love one or two of those guys but why would we pay anything near fair value? If we say we’d give you Rasmus Kupari and a 3rd for Palat and Kilorn do you say no?
Your scenario only works if there is a single bidder. The minute multiple teams are involved the equation changes
 

RussianGuyovich

Hella Ennui
Jan 2, 2007
9,974
8,344
I’m sure my Kings would love one or two of those guys but why would we pay anything near fair value? If we say we’d give you Rasmus Kupari and a 3rd for Palat and Kilorn do you say no?

because you're still competing with 30 other teams? leverage is real, but you're over-exaggerating it. this is not a vacuum, and as it been said: no one is colluding to hurt Tampa no matter how much hand-wringing comes from HF posters
 

kinghock

Registered User
Feb 1, 2011
3,445
2,763
Mahwah,NJ
Leverage is an extreme circumstance, you obviously don’t understand that. Are Palat/Kilorn/Gourde worth a 1st? Absolutely, especially in a normal year and even more so at the TDL. This isn’t that, while no team would hurt themselves they’re also going to try and likely succeed at screwing you over because you are the competition. How you not understand that is beyond me, those guys you have mentioned are now viewed as dumps! Look no further than Taransenko, TB is hoping Seattle snatched up one of the above to alleviate this issue but I think they go for Foote. I’m sure my Kings would love one or two of those guys but why would we pay anything near fair value? If we say we’d give you Rasmus Kupari and a 3rd for Palat and Kilorn do you say no?

I would keep Rasmus Kupari for better trades (young defensemen).
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingsOfThe805

theimmortal1

Registered User
Sep 26, 2020
788
595
Leverage is an extreme circumstance, you obviously don’t understand that. Are Palat/Kilorn/Gourde worth a 1st? Absolutely, especially in a normal year and even more so at the TDL. This isn’t that, while no team would hurt themselves they’re also going to try and likely succeed at screwing you over because you are the competition. How you not understand that is beyond me, those guys you have mentioned are now viewed as dumps! Look no further than Taransenko, TB is hoping Seattle snatched up one of the above to alleviate this issue but I think they go for Foote. I’m sure my Kings would love one or two of those guys but why would we pay anything near fair value? If we say we’d give you Rasmus Kupari and a 3rd for Palat and Kilorn do you say no?

If that’s the offer we bring that offer to a dozen other teams and they’ll gladly beat it.

Yes we are the competition. But so are you. Why would other teams want their competition to get a good player for under market value when they themselves could get said player?

Your scenario works if it’s only one team in play. The Lightning can deal with the entire league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2020 Cup Champions

theimmortal1

Registered User
Sep 26, 2020
788
595
because you're still competing with 30 other teams? leverage is real, but you're over-exaggerating it. this is not a vacuum, and as it been said: no one is colluding to hurt Tampa no matter how much hand-wringing comes from HF posters

It’s crazy. It’s like HF posters really think 30 GMs will sit around and be like “XYZ team getting Palat for a 5th, but in a few months we will use a 1st to get him at the TDL”

It’s like a hatred for the Lightning is stronger than their desire to improve their own team
 

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,300
4,116
Las Vegas
If that’s the offer we bring that offer to a dozen other teams and they’ll gladly beat it.

Yes we are the competition. But so are you. Why would other teams want their competition to get a good player for under market value when they themselves could get said player?

Your scenario works if it’s only one team in play. The Lightning can deal with the entire league.
No the Kings aren’t your competition nor are other similar teams like the Ducks, Sabres and other bottom rung teams. With that said, what team is offering a 1st for Palat, 1st for Kilorn and a 1st for Gourde?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kinghock

theimmortal1

Registered User
Sep 26, 2020
788
595
No the Kings aren’t your competition nor are other similar teams like the Ducks, Sabres and other bottom rung teams. With that said, what team is offering a 1st for Palat, 1st for Kilorn and a 1st for Gourde?

All teams are competition for all teams.

You are a Kings fan. Would you not want the Kings to beat a low ball offer by a team like the Ducks?

That directly hurts your team. What is the logic in that?
 

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,300
4,116
Las Vegas
because you're still competing with 30 other teams? leverage is real, but you're over-exaggerating it. this is not a vacuum, and as it been said: no one is colluding to hurt Tampa no matter how much hand-wringing comes from HF posters
No they’re not colluding but they also aren’t going to help you with a fair trade. Depending on how this expansion draft shakes out with the Kraken and the trades they make, teams with cap space now could find themselves out all over again.
A good GM knows that Tampa is $10 mill over, will need to pay Point, Serg and Erik the next two seasons and will pay pennies on the dollar. Look at Nashville to get an idea of what your returns will likely be
 

periferal

Registered User
Jul 5, 2007
29,249
16,631
Totally psyched to watch Stamkos go on LTIR for 21-22 due to "post traumatic cup celebrating" or something like that.


See you in the spring Stammer. :thumbu:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lt Dan

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,300
4,116
Las Vegas
All teams are competition for all teams.

You are a Kings fan. Would you not want the Kings to beat a low ball offer by a team like the Ducks?

That directly hurts your team. What is the logic in that?
Why? Think about that, why?
There’s so much talent available with the expansion draft, buyouts and UFA that it’s become a buyers market.
Granted, I should have just said that lol… it’s a buyers market that will stagnate the market.. also, take a peak at what these young Dman are getting to have an idea of what Serg and Cernak will try to get and Point is a $9 mill per player on the lightning… so again, leverage
 

theimmortal1

Registered User
Sep 26, 2020
788
595
Why? Think about that, why?
There’s so much talent available with the expansion draft, buyouts and UFA that it’s become a buyers market.
Granted, I should have just said that lol… it’s a buyers market that will stagnate the market.. also, take a peak at what these young Dman are getting to have an idea of what Serg and Cernak will try to get and Point is a $9 mill per player on the lightning… so again, leverage

Your team just traded a 2nd and 3rd for Arvidsson. Palat, Killorn and Gourde are all better.

So as a Kings fan you’d be happy to trade what you did for Arvidsson and then watch a team in your division give up less for a better player?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad