NorthCoast
Registered User
- May 1, 2017
- 1,250
- 1,167
I read they gave the city 19 million, they then will lease the building for 4 million a year for 35 years. They will be in charge of the building and make money of every venue in the building. The city will give them 2 million a year in advertising.
So for two million a year they get the building the naming rights and any profits that can be made on the side. You might say that is better then owning it.
Yeah, It's so ridiculous that your probably right.
It does box the team in a bit though. Curious how they will deal with stadium improvements over time, or if Katz sells int he next 35 years...how will lease vs owning the building effect sale price, etc.
Honestly, for as much as Canadians talk about not supporting stadiums with public money, it's very hard for small markets to get a stadium without some public incentive (straight cash in Edm/que, under-valued land in Ott, olympics in Calgary...)