Post-Game Talk: Leather Jackets @ The Powerhouse | 4/5/19 - 7PM - MSG PLUS

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I cannot believe they tied that damn game.

WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?????

I don't think the point will make a difference. It might, but its less likely statistically.

Detroit and Buffalo both have the ROW tiebreaker over us.
-Scratch that, Detroit plays Buffalo.
 
You're right. Letting a young G play on a team that is developing youngsters certainly shows that they are NOT tanking :eyeroll:

Trading their best players away for 2 seasons in a row? Compared to letting a young G play on a developing team? Bah. Practically meaningless. Clearly the G playing outweighs trading away all of your best vets
Wait wait wait. Are you saying the moves they made meant they were in tank mode and should have been operating as such since then. Bc I’m just gonna tell you now, your on the wrong boat, your gonna end up having come back to THE boat. The rangers moved those guys bc it’s the was the smart thing, they weren’t winning with them, they wouldn’t signing them long time. So they moved pro-actively (not pro-actively enough I say) to turn those guys into a replenished system and free cap space to turn into new established players whenever they became available.

Let me know when the rangers show it’s anything but that.
 
I agree with Edge. I like his uniqueness. He’s good defensively, but can also skate. He’s never going to produce big offensive numbers, but he can make some nice passes. He’s physical, but small. He’s sort of a contradiction.

But unfortunately he gets lost in the shuffle. And that’s the only negative of acquiring Fox. Because if we do end up signing Fox, Lindgren will just get pushed further down the depth chart.


K’Andre
ADA
Fox
Skjei
Lundkvist
Hajek
Keane
Lindgren

fox plays the right side so he wouldn't effect lindgren...he'd effect pionk, lundkvist and keane...but having too many good players at a position is NEVER a bad thing. it might make it more difficult to project the future lineup. but if, lets say, lindgren and keane end up being good players but still can't make the team cause we have 6 guys who are even better than sign me up.

also you need to keep in mind that when building the defense, you don't need 3 pairs of guys that can play 25+ minutes a night...so a guy like lindgren could potentially fit in perfectly as a 3rd pair guy behind 2 of miller/skjei/hajek while the other is used in a trade to fill another hole

but again too much talent is never bad
 
I don't think the point will make a difference. It might, but its less likely statistically.

Detroit and Buffalo both have the ROW tiebreaker over us.

the point makes a difference because now the best we can finish is 5th if we loses and whoever wins between wings and sabres pass us. had we lost (or any other loser point) and the wings/sabres went to OT we'd be 4th. yeah that scenario probably won't happen so in the end it won't matter but when things are that close a random point here or there ends up mattering in the end
 
Wait wait wait. Are you saying the moves they made meant they were in tank mode and should have been operating as such since then. Bc I’m just gonna tell you now, your on the wrong boat, your gonna end up having come back to THE boat. The rangers moved those guys bc it’s the was the smart thing, they weren’t winning with them, they wouldn’t signing them long time. So they moved pro-actively (not pro-actively enough I say) to turn those guys into a replenished system and free cap space to turn into new established players whenever they became available.

Let me know when the rangers show it’s anything but that.
Time out

Were you jokingly saying Edge doesn't get how competitors roll

Were you being sarcastic when you said Georgiev should'bt have played?

or do you actually believe that stupid ****?

Because responses like this one and the first thing I responded to from (shown below) suggest you were actually criticizing Edge and making a stupid point that didn't need to be made.

That’s not the right way for athletes and competitors to roll. They are gonna play to tie every game they’re down in and they are gonna play to hold to the lead in every game they are up. Otherwise your Edmonton buffalo of Arizona from years back

There is not even a vague hint of sarcasm in this post. it looks like you legit thought you had to point this out to Edge.

There's no hint of sarcasm in your latest post either. I think you might actually believe that they weren't trying to tank. If so then just :facepalm:.
 
Really if the are 5th when it’s said and done. They still got their balls for a top 3 and if it’s 5 or 6 instead of 4. They are still gonna get a guy. You Byram or one of the top 3-4 centers prospects in the draft.

It’s all good. Misery must of been watching this season getting emotionally affected by them going into OT. That stuff was inevitable. Come on men
 
Time out

Were you jokingly saying Edge doesn't get how competitors roll

Were you being sarcastic when you said Georgiev should'bt have played?

or do you actually believe that stupid ****?

Because responses like this one and the first thing I responded to from (shown below) suggest you were actually criticizing Edge and making a stupid point that didn't need to be made.



There is not even a vague hint of sarcasm in this post. it looks like you legit thought you had to point this out to Edge.

There's no hint of sarcasm in your latest post either. I think you might actually believe that they weren't trying to tank. If so then just :facepalm:.
Im out lol

And yes so there is no confusion. I wasn’t being sarcastic about anything. And no, they weren’t tanking haha
 
Oh no. A loss so massive idk how we'll ever be able to bear it.

And yes so there is no confusion. I wasn’t being sarcastic about anything. And no, they weren’t tanking haha

Look I can beleive people have dumb opinions on here but I refuse to believe you said"real talk" un-ironically.

I just cringed so hard that space and time folded in around me.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad