I assumed the purpose of referencing specific players was pretty obvious—to establish the difference between a truly elite, generational talent and a good NHL player. If that inference needs to be explained step-by-step, we're probably not having the same conversation.
Slafkovský was drafted first overall, but let's not pretend he was NHL-ready from day one. He scored 4 goals in his rookie season. Yes, he was on a weak team, but nothing about that season suggested he was immediately prepared to be a difference-maker at the NHL level. You're conflating playing in the NHL and being NHL ready as if it is the same thing, second time you've done that.
You seem far more interested in arguing than discussing the actual point. Whether that's frustration or immaturity, I'll leave that up to others to decide.
A conversation requires two people willing to engage in good faith. I don't see that happening here, so I'll leave it at that.
Take care.
Literally nobody you're responding to made this claim.
Slafkovsky playing in the NHL was good for his development in the long run, sometimes players simply need the reps, you can use the same arguments for Hughes, in the long run it benefitted his development.
Being NHL ready doesn't equal being ready to step in and be a star, it means they're ready to step in and play, both were and it certainly didn't hinder their development.
The issue is you're largely having a conversation/argument with yourself, you aren't contending with legitimate arguments.

