Confirmed with Link: Leafs Trade: Liljegren to San Jose for Matt Benning, 3rd and 6th

darrylsittler27

Registered User
Oct 21, 2002
7,355
1,556
Remember this comment you made my friend
Why? The situation is the situation. He didn't fit, we need picks and San Jose won't win a cup. Sure a new environment may help but it wasn't going to be here and we need another C. You don't pay 3 million to a guy the coach won't play. He maybe the next Stralman but he wasn't going to help us win a cup. Go look at the 2017 draft..it's hellabad. Most drafts he is a second rounder. He may even told them..trade me.
 

usernamezrhardtodo

Registered User
Mar 26, 2014
2,464
2,996
why sign him for 3M
thats crazy
Because he might have gotten more through arbitration. They were worried that he might come in much higher because of the advanced fancy stats. If a meh player like Sandin signs for well over $4M....it would scare the Leafs into making a deal I guess.
 

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
12,178
17,134
Well Sandin was drafted in 2018 and traded in mid 2023. Liljegren was drafted in 2017 and traded in late 2024. So I think there’s also a difference between trading a Dman when he’s a little younger vs 2.5 years later when there’s more data on them. To Dubas’ credit I’d say the return on Sandin was surprising at the time. I don’t think there’s a world where Liljegren coming off the Boston series would have given us a 1st or 2nd. If it was possible it would have happened right?

I guess I’d be confused about paying a guy 3 mil if no one in the league values him at even a late 2nd in that case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,838
9,855
Acton, Ontario
A fair question to say the least.

One would assume Tre figured he'd be able to get something for him on the market. But it's a puzzling deal to give to a guy with clearly little value around the league
You'd have to imagine he'd have had more value (even if marginally) if he wasn't benched and sold at a low

Why would anyone in the League pay market price, let alone a premium, when Tre is in a corner approaching an IR cap crunch, and it's obvious and wants to move Lily
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,033
34,482
St. Paul, MN
You'd have to imagine he'd have had more value if he wasn't benched and sold at a low (even if marginally)

Why would anyone in the League pay market price, let alone a premium, when Tre is in a corner approaching an IR cap crunch, and it's obvious and wants to move Lily

The entire handling him was dysfunctional, and it goes beyond the last few months too.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,138
58,596
I guess I’d be confused about paying a guy 3 mil if no one in the league values him at even a late 2nd in that case.

I suppose they could have walked away from Liljegren and not qualified him, but then they wouldn't have these marginal picks.

Olli Maatta was traded for a third rounder 2 days ago and makes $3 million.
 

Burnie97

Registered User
Jun 26, 2015
14,768
13,889
Canada
How many times do people have to say it, was either sign him or let him walk for nothing. What sounds smarter to you? Crazy anyone thinks differently, he was going to arbitration.
Yup. Just received 2 picks for him and maybe they flip Benning and get another pick.

So let him walk... or 2 to 3 picks.

But that's bad assest management?

I liked Lilly too but he wasn't improving enough on a team trying to win now.

He could very well get better and I wish him all the best but he went to the right team for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkKnight

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,138
58,596
What if that $3mm was available on July 1st.

It was reported they were after Matt Roy as well in the offseason but didn't get him cause they couldn't go that high. Roy makes $5.75 million with Washington, so maybe we have him instead of OEL... maybe they could have grabbed another middle six guy with the money.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,138
58,596
A fair question to say the least.

One would assume Tre figured he'd be able to get something for him on the market. But it's a puzzling deal to give to a guy with clearly little value around the league

How is it puzzling in the least?

They signed Liljegren to a contract to a) hedge against heavier arbitration award and b) letting him walk as a UFA... mission accomplished.*

*The opportunity cost was having more cap space in free agency, but they still got OEL, Tanev and Stolarz who have fit in well.

They wait a few months, realized he's not in their plans in camp, explored the market, pulled the trigger on a trade and have cleared out the bulk of his salary. In all of this they've managed to lose no one on waivers, and are in position to activate a few guys off LTIR.
 

Dough72

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
1,988
799
he might not be over the Marchand hit yet. For whatever reason, injuries like that can throw you off for like a season or more even after you're 100% healthy again.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,033
34,482
St. Paul, MN
How is it puzzling in the least?

They signed Liljegren to a contract to a) hedge against heavier arbitration award and b) letting him walk as a UFA... mission accomplished.*

*The opportunity cost was having more cap space in free agency, but they still got OEL, Tanev and Stolarz who have fit in well.

They wait a few months, realized he's not in their plans in camp, explored the market, pulled the trigger on a trade and have cleared out the bulk of his salary. In all of this they've managed to lose no one on waivers, and are in position to activate a few guys off LTIR.

I think awarding a contract to a guy who you know isn't worth it AND giving him term carries a considerable amount of unnecessary risk. Especially when you knew there was a reasonable chance the new coach wouldn't have much interest in showcasing him.

Tre put himself in a hole, and had to quickly dig himself out. It's worked out, in the end, so water under the bridge for the most part. But I don't think anyone can say this was an ideal situation (with a straight face, at least)

I actually liked Tres free agency this year,l. Having 3 more mil to play around with could have given the third line an extra impact player, or maybe being able to add a 6 mil D man if need be. It's not unreasonable to think that 3 mil in free agency could be more impactful than whatever Tre trades that 3rd rounder for at the tdl next year.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,452
52,747
Yup. Just received 2 picks for him and maybe they flip Benning and get another pick.

So let him walk... or 2 to 3 picks.

But that's bad assest management?

I liked Lilly too but he wasn't improving enough on a team trying to win now.

He could very well get better and I wish him all the best but he went to the right team for now.
Also by signing him and strategically giving most of the money in bonuses, it always meant it would be easier to move. He had arb rights, we made the best of it for sure
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,138
58,596
I think awarding a contract to a guy who you know isn't worth it AND giving him term carries a considerable amount of unnecessary risk. Especially when you knew there was a reasonable chance the new coach wouldn't have much interest in showcasing him.

Tre put himself in a hole, and had to quickly dig himself out. It's worked out, in the end, so water under the bridge for the most part. But I don't think anyone can say this was an ideal situation (with a straight face, at least)

I actually liked Tres free agency this year,l. Having 3 more mil to play around with could have given the third line an extra impact player, or maybe being able to add a 6 mil D man if need be. It's not unreasonable to think that 3 mil in free agency could be more impactful than whatever Tre trades that 3rd rounder for at the tdl next year.

If he didn't qualify Liljegren everyone would have been upset they let such a wonderful asset walk to free agency with what little RHD depth we had...
 

darrylsittler27

Registered User
Oct 21, 2002
7,355
1,556
he might not be over the Marchand hit yet. For whatever reason, injuries like that can throw you off for like a season or more even after you're 100% healthy again.
We must never forget what Marchand did. Reeves was gutless and Xhekaj proved he is a weak man full of fear. I would have traded Reeves the next day. He needs to be waived as he clearly is not capable of doing his job. He is an unneeded part clogging up the ice.
 

Martin Skoula

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
12,178
17,134
If he didn't qualify Liljegren everyone would have been upset they let such a wonderful asset walk to free agency with what little RHD depth we had...

Is people on a message board being upset a relevant factor for a GM’s decision making?
 

Jmo89

Registered User
Mar 21, 2010
4,581
4,219
Is there any chance Benning can be better than the team's current #6 options or is he poopoo?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad