Confirmed with Link: Leafs Trade: Liljegren to San Jose for Matt Benning, 3rd and 6th

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,218
15,938
No. I don't agree. It's not a share-all situation. Liljegren is a big in boy big pants. A professional athlete.
Is Treliving not a professional GM in big boy pants? Is Berube not a professional coach in big boy pants? They have responsibilities too, and they took actions that hurt his trade value - paying him more than he's worth (I'm not sure how you can pretend to disagree when you keep going on and on about how garbage Liljegren is), and healthy scratching him for 90% of games and setting him up to fail when they're looking to trade him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CapspaceKiller

Cap'n Flavour

Registered User
Mar 8, 2004
5,036
1,777
Flavour Country
I lost patience with Liljegren after his poor playoff/post-deadline performances but considering he played reasonably well for the first 70ish games last season, it's pretty disappointing that he returned less than an utterly broken Olli Maatta and that we had to take Benning back too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CapspaceKiller

Racer88

Registered User
Sep 29, 2020
11,949
11,964
The time line of most leaf prospects
New prospect…..this guy is the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ
2 years in …….this guys a bum…..
3 year in……….t.he guy is useless.
Prospect just traded …..the guy is gonna break out on the new team and be awesome…..OMG what have we done.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: OddyOh and uncleben

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
5,976
5,375
Is Treliving not a professional GM in big boy pants? Is Berube not a professional coach in big boy pants? They have responsibilities too, and they took actions that hurt his trade value - paying him more than he's worth (I'm not sure how you can pretend to disagree when you keep going on and on about how garbage Liljegren is), and healthy scratching him for 90% of games and setting him up to fail when they're looking to trade him.
I don't know. I don't believe that this is a lawyer litigation moment: Berube 33% of the blame, Tre 34% of the blame, and Liljegren 33% of the blame.

Why don't you cut all the crap out of your discussion and tell us how Dubas would have dealt with Liljegren if he were in this situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CincoHolio

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,218
15,938
I don't know. I don't believe that this is a lawyer litigation moment: Berube 33% of the blame, Tre 34% of the blame, and Liljegren 33% of the blame.
Lawyer litigation? Percentages? What the heck are you talking about? You're the only one trying to make this more complicated than it is.
It's simple. Lilegren's trade value was hurt by his recent play, but it was also hurt by Treliving overpaying him, and Berube not playing him or setting him up for success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,120
58,569
Is Treliving not a professional GM in big boy pants? Is Berube not a professional coach in big boy pants? They have responsibilities too, and they took actions that hurt his trade value - paying him more than he's worth (I'm not sure how you can pretend to disagree when you keep going on and on about how garbage Liljegren is), and healthy scratching him for 90% of games and setting him up to fail when they're looking to trade him.

Previous management would often pull the same stunt with players. Bringing in Mikko Lehtonen and Alexander Barabanov on mercenary prove me deals, give them zero runway to settle in and then explain dumping them for nothing as a promise to find them an NHL opportunity.

The common denominator is if you’re not in a team’s plans they won’t spend time building you up. Time to move on.
 

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
10,984
11,816
Previous management would often pull the same stunt with players. Bringing in Mikko Lehtonen and Alexander Barabanov on mercenary prove me deals, give them zero runway to settle in and then explain dumping them for nothing as a promise to find them an NHL opportunity.

The common denominator is if you’re not in a team’s plans they won’t spend time building you up. Time to move on.
Yeah, but like, that was good, and this is bad.
 

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
5,976
5,375
Lawyer litigation? Percentages? What the heck are you talking about? You're the only one trying to make this more complicated than it is.
It's simple. Lilegren's trade value was hurt by his recent play, but it was also hurt by Treliving overpaying him, and Berube not playing him or setting him up for success.
No. It's all on Liljegren. He's semi-bum.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,218
15,938
Previous management would often pull the same stunt with players. Bringing in Mikko Lehtonen and Alexander Barabanov on mercenary prove me deals, give them zero runway to settle in and then explain dumping them for nothing as a promise to find them an NHL opportunity.
Lehtonen and Barabanov were overseas free agents that were signed to one year league minimum contracts as depth insurance in the covid year, under the agreement that they would be moved if they didn't earn a spot. We played them, and they didn't earn a spot over others, so we moved them for the expected return.

I'm not really sure how you're trying to equate this to re-signing an established, drafted mid-20s RHD for 3m and term, playing him for 1 game the next season, and then dumping him for a couple mid-low picks and a cap dump. Very obviously, not close to the same thing.
No. It's all on Liljegren.
His play? Yes. His trade value? No.
 

GoonieFace

Registered User
Jun 24, 2013
7,783
7,972
The Matrix
Lawyer litigation? Percentages? What the heck are you talking about? You're the only one trying to make this more complicated than it is.
It's simple. Lilegren's trade value was hurt by his recent play, but it was also hurt by Treliving overpaying him, and Berube not playing him or setting him up for success.
Why would you play a garbage defenceman? It would only tank his value more, if he had any to begin with. Overpaying him was a mistake, he didn’t deserve to be in the lineup though
 

The Management

Registered User
Jun 8, 2009
2,035
2,299
I commented on the main board thread, but I liked Liljegren and find it weird how they dealt with him this season. Giving him a contract that's partly a show of faith, only to bench him following, what, a rough preseason? A bad game? Just seems unusual to me, especially when you're playing a guy like Connor Timmins ahead of him.

Regardless, as I also confessed on the main board... I have a blind spot for Swedish defenseman, especially if they can skate and have a little bit of size. If I were in charge, I'd probably fill the back-end with third pairing scrubs from the SHL, so my opinion is probably not one to be trusted. Bring back Carl Gunnarsson! Bring back Anton Stralman!

Onward and upwards, I suppose. Let's see how the money is spent.
 

rumman

Registered User
Sep 10, 2008
16,356
12,742
On the Sharks board they're pretty happy to see Benning gone and they didn't have to pay a great deal to move him.
If he’s that bad after getting a look waive him, can’t see a downside here………
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad