conFABulator
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2021
- 1,743
- 1,532
Yeah, who knows. We will find out soon though because that would be the easiest option unless Tre is opposed to it.I don't think Tre does though.
Yeah, who knows. We will find out soon though because that would be the easiest option unless Tre is opposed to it.I don't think Tre does though.
Yes, very good - you can read that he has played right wing in the NHL.View attachment 906968View attachment 906969
just 2 scouting report from 2014 i found pretty fast... Nylander played at time as c like Marner did, like Cowan did... That's doesn't mean he was a center...
its draft scouting report from 2014, not a scouting report from 2024Yes, very good - you can read that he has played right wing in the NHL.
2014 is relevant when somebody is making false claims about Nylander's history. He is a winger. It is the position that best suits his playstyle and qualities, and he hasn't looked great any time he has played center. If Nylander is able to change up his game to become a center a decade into his NHL career, good for him, but there are some people pushing this way too hard when we already have two quality top-six centers.Why does 2014 matter? We complain that one of our centres can’t pass, our other center can’t skate, and neither holds the puck long enough for the wingers to find space. There’s precisely one guy on the team who does all 3 of those things exceptionally well and has some experience at C.
“We want to play aggressive, physical hockey. I like to have a heavy team. And we want to play fast. And when I say heavy, I don’t mean running around and fighting people. Our team in St. Louis probably had the least number of fights in the NHL. We just played hard hockey, good in front of both nets."
“We want a team that’s hard to play against. We don’t want to just outscore our problems. We want to play good, sound, structured, disciplined, hard hockey.”
Plays Heavy Hockey | Shown Flashes of Heavy Hockey | Hasn't Played Heavy Hockey |
Matthews Tavares Knies McMann Dewar Reaves Lorentz Tanev McCabe Benoit Hakanpaa | Nylander Domi Kampf Jarnkrok Rielly Ekman-Larsson | Marner Robertson Holmberg Pacioretty Liljegren Timmins |
2014 is relevant when somebody is making false claims about Nylander's history. He is a winger. It is the position that best suits his playstyle and qualities, and he hasn't looked great any time he has played center. If Nylander is able to change up his game to become a center a decade into his NHL career, good for him, but there are some people pushing this way too hard when we already have two quality top-six centers.
Been thinking about Berube's quotes from a couple of days ago and what it will mean for the final roster.
He stressed heavy and hard hockey a lot. I think anyone that can't or won't play that way will quickly find themselves on the outskirts of the lineup and in Chief's doghouse. I believe a lot of our roster is able to play how Berube wants, but there are a couple of players who will definitely have to step up in this regard.
Plays Heavy Hockey Shown Flashes of Heavy Hockey Hasn't Played Heavy Hockey Matthews
Tavares
Knies
McMann
Dewar
Reaves
Lorentz
Tanev
McCabe
Benoit
Hakanpaa Nylander
Domi
Kampf
Jarnkrok
Rielly
Ekman-Larsson Marner
Robertson
Holmberg
Pacioretty
Liljegren
Timmins
Most of this roster has shown to be capable of playing heavy, hard hockey. Some like Nylander are inconsistent but they've demonstrated the ability. Those in the right column should be on their toes and need to show a willingness to play the way Berube outlines, otherwise they'll be on the chopping block. Some will be safer than others, like Marner who while he doesn't play heavy is one of the best two-way players in hockey. Domi isn't lacking heart but he'll have to show more commitment to the defensive side of the puck to really endear himself and keep his spot in the lineup.
Been thinking about Berube's quotes from a couple of days ago and what it will mean for the final roster.
He stressed heavy and hard hockey a lot. I think anyone that can't or won't play that way will quickly find themselves on the outskirts of the lineup and in Chief's doghouse. I believe a lot of our roster is able to play how Berube wants, but there are a couple of players who will definitely have to step up in this regard.
Plays Heavy Hockey Shown Flashes of Heavy Hockey Hasn't Played Heavy Hockey Matthews
Tavares
Knies
McMann
Dewar
Reaves
Lorentz
Tanev
McCabe
Benoit
Hakanpaa Nylander
Domi
Kampf
Jarnkrok
Rielly
Ekman-Larsson Marner
Robertson
Holmberg
Pacioretty
Liljegren
Timmins
Most of this roster has shown to be capable of playing heavy, hard hockey. Some like Nylander are inconsistent but they've demonstrated the ability. Those in the right column should be on their toes and need to show a willingness to play the way Berube outlines, otherwise they'll be on the chopping block. Some will be safer than others, like Marner who while he doesn't play heavy is one of the best two-way players in hockey. Domi isn't lacking heart but he'll have to show more commitment to the defensive side of the puck to really endear himself and keep his spot in the lineup.
He played C for the Marlies and in his first Leafs stint, he plays it for Sweden, both of those are a more recent than 2014. He hasn’t gotten more than a handful of games in a row at C, and most of those games were last second adjustments after injury. We have no idea what he looks like with consistent linemates and minutes but odds are it’s better than Tavares struggling to catch up to the play the majority of the time he’s on the ice.
We had 2 top 6 Cs, we don’t know how many we have going into this year with Tavares a year older and slower. Even if he can still hack it at C in sheltered minutes this year, he’s UFA and visibly slowing down. It would be wise to give a legitimate chance to our in-house option with every skillset you need in an offensive 2C before we start looking at overpaying an outside replacement. It’s not like 10 sequential games of the experiment is going to single handedly lose us games and change anything important about the season especially when our next best option is either an even worse defensively and worse skating Domi or one of Kampf/Holmberg.
Fully agree.
It might not work, but those on here that claim this is unthinkable are not right. Nylander at C could make us better this year and dramatically better in the future if we are not spending our resources to get a 2C. The next few years of Matthews, Nylander, Tavares, Minten, Holmberg, Quillan, Dewar, or even a 4C UFA being our roster of C's is a pretty good strength and be less than $30m.
I have no idea why, but he seems to have a real dislike for Nylander, and will go to any lengths to try to discredit him. He frequently goes back many years or selects a very specific time frame to try to support his views.Why does 2014 matter? We complain that one of our centres can’t pass, our other center can’t skate, and neither holds the puck long enough for the wingers to find space. There’s precisely one guy on the team who does all 3 of those things exceptionally well and has some experience at C.
Going back to the KHL if he doesn't make the team is what would happen, but it's very unlikely IMO. I think if he was going to stay in Russia another season he wouldn't have signed his ELC and just gone back. Historically it's very rare for a player to sign out of the KHL with enough leverage to get a Euro Assignment Clause in their contract, and not at least make the team out of camp on a short leash.
When marner was out with injury, Matthews scored 9 goals in 12 games, a 61.5 pace.
So, yes marner helped him, but perhaps not to the extent believed.
marner:
Matthews:
Playing center in international tournaments on different ice surfaces is not the same thing as playing center in the NHL. Nylander does not have every skillset you'd want in a center. He has the skillsets you'd want in a winger. That's why he's a winger. It's one thing to do a small experiment to test things out for an injury or the future, but we're not talking about a little experiment, or what to do in case of injury, or alternatives to overpaying an outside replacement. We're talking about people advocating for permanently changing Nylander to center after a decade as a winger, when we have no real need to do so, or evidence that it will work better. We still have two top-six centers, and despite the dramatics by some around here, there is no real indication that Tavares is about to drastically fall off.He played C for the Marlies and in his first Leafs stint, he plays it for Sweden, both of those are a more recent than 2014. He hasn’t gotten more than a handful of games in a row at C, and most of those games were last second adjustments after injury. We have no idea what he looks like with consistent linemates and minutes but odds are it’s better than Tavares struggling to catch up to the play the majority of the time he’s on the ice.
We had 2 top 6 Cs, we don’t know how many we have going into this year with Tavares a year older and slower. Even if he can still hack it at C in sheltered minutes this year, he’s UFA and visibly slowing down. It would be wise to give a legitimate chance to our in-house option with every skillset you need in an offensive 2C before we start looking at overpaying an outside replacement. It’s not like 10 sequential games of the experiment is going to single handedly lose us games and change anything important about the season especially when our next best option is either an even worse defensively and worse skating Domi or one of Kampf/Holmberg.
I think Hakanpaa will be the 7th d and there's no way Murray becomes the no.2 guy over stolarz. It'll be Woll 1A and stolarz 1BKnies - Matthews - Domi
Robertson - Tavares - Marner
Pacioretty - Minten - Nylander
McMann - Kampf - Jarnkrok
Reaves
Rielly - Tanev
McCabe - Liljegren
OEL - Hakanpaa
Benoit
Woll - Murray - Stolarz
Been thinking about Berube's quotes from a couple of days ago and what it will mean for the final roster.
He stressed heavy and hard hockey a lot. I think anyone that can't or won't play that way will quickly find themselves on the outskirts of the lineup and in Chief's doghouse. I believe a lot of our roster is able to play how Berube wants, but there are a couple of players who will definitely have to step up in this regard.
Plays Heavy Hockey Shown Flashes of Heavy Hockey Hasn't Played Heavy Hockey Matthews
Tavares
Knies
McMann
Dewar
Reaves
Lorentz
Tanev
McCabe
Benoit
Hakanpaa Nylander
Domi
Kampf
Jarnkrok
Rielly
Ekman-Larsson Marner
Robertson
Holmberg
Pacioretty
Liljegren
Timmins
Most of this roster has shown to be capable of playing heavy, hard hockey. Some like Nylander are inconsistent but they've demonstrated the ability. Those in the right column should be on their toes and need to show a willingness to play the way Berube outlines, otherwise they'll be on the chopping block. Some will be safer than others, like Marner who while he doesn't play heavy is one of the best two-way players in hockey. Domi isn't lacking heart but he'll have to show more commitment to the defensive side of the puck to really endear himself and keep his spot in the lineup.
If Hakanpaa is healthy, he’s one of the better defenceman PKers in the league. Wouldn’t surprise me if he starts in the top six, if healthy.I think Hakanpaa will be the 7th d and there's no way Murray becomes the no.2 guy over stolarz. It'll be Woll 1A and stolarz 1B
i think he meant that nylander isnt part of the group thats avoiding contact altogether hes never been a physical player hes just physically gifted so he can handle the rough play that marners still avoidingNylander is clearly not in the right one. The fact he scoring clutche goal doesn't mean he was playing hard and heavy hockey... He was playing fast hockey for sure but certainly no heavy/hard hockey.
I don't expect him to be the defenceman he once wasIf Hakanpaa is healthy, he’s one of the better defenceman PKers in the league. Wouldn’t surprise me if he starts in the top six, if healthy.
If Murray is healthy, I wouldn’t be surprised if the team runs all 3. All 3 are injury prone so the likelihood of one getting injured sooner than later is pretty likely.