Tie Domi Esquire
Go Real Sports Apparel Go!
- Oct 18, 2010
- 3,471
- 1,444
Wat???
Gotta love our fanbase.
Because he's 32 when the deal starts and the team is nowhere near winning or going on a run.
Wat???
Gotta love our fanbase.
Ahhhh - you are starting the rebuild next year.Because he's 32 when the deal starts and the team is nowhere near winning or going on a run.
Sooner or later ? Pain has been here the last eight years come playoff time.In isolation - love the deal, and the AAV.
Big picture - exact same concerns I had with the Muzzin extension, I have here. That's a lot of term and money for a guy that plays a really heavy brand of hockey.
That Leafs blueline has a lot of money and term now committed to a lot of older guys - the pain is going to come here, sooner or later.
If we don’t hit on a couple prospects or draft pics we’re screwedReasonable contract. With that being said, I am pretty concerned about how our D is gonna age:
- Tanev: currently 34, signed this year and 5 more ($4.5 mil AAV)
- OEL: currently 33, signed this year and 3 more ($3.5 mil AAV)
- McCabe: currently 31, signed this year and 5 more ($2 mil AAV this year, then $4.5 mil AAV the rest)
- Rielly: currently 30, signed this year and 5 more ($7.5 mil AAV)
Right now, these deals are fine. But it’s very, very common for players to drop off significantly in their early 30s. These guys are all going to be 36 to 40 by the time their deals expire, the chance of these deals collectively becoming an absolute boat anchor is really high.
All of these deals are reasonable in isolation, they’re all likely “good for a few years, then bad the last few years” type deals. But having 4 like that is scary.
They deferred 5.5M of his bonuses until year 6.Can someone explain how they calculate the cap hit with deferred money? Mcabes deal
Is actually 23.5 over 5 years which is a 4.7 cap hit. If the cap hit is 4.51 million that works to 22.55. Is the difference what is deferred? Is there a cap hit for that in year 6 after his contract ends?
I haven't really looked into it but I think AAV savings are limited to the difference between present day and future day value of bonus deferral amounts, which have their own restrictions. Something like that.
Not sure if Jarvis for example maxed out what is possible, but his AAV was reduced by 6%.
Can someone explain how they calculate the cap hit with deferred money? Mcabes deal
Is actually 23.5 over 5 years which is a 4.7 cap hit. If the cap hit is 4.51 million that works to 22.55. Is the difference what is deferred? Is there a cap hit for that in year 6 after his contract ends?
Deferred compensation in NHL contracts allows teams to reduce cap hits by paying players after their contract ends. Though this strategy offers cap advantages, it's rare due to the potentially minimal impact on cap savings and players’ preference for immediate earnings.
Ahhhh - you are starting the rebuild next year.
Love this forward thinking…
They've been in win now mode since 2018. Wasting picks, prospects, cap space, and letting players walk for nothing. They've won one fluke series in that time.
They aren't good enough, end of story. At what point do you acknowledge reality? McCabe's cap hit will double from what it currently is. Signing McCabe makes sure they stay at this same level at best for a year or 2 of his deal before the dramatic fall off.
Personally I want the team to become competitive. Maybe I'm wrong for wanting that. But I guess everyone back with a raise except for Tavares, who will be back at half price, will make them good enough to not lose to everyone.
Talking specifically about them aging poorly.Sooner or later ? Pain has been here the last eight years come playoff time.
Though what you would (likely?) prefer isn't really going to unfold until the teams current core is traded or leaves in free agency. So McCabe's deal really has no bearing on that In the grand scheme of things
Personally I don't the deal is constraining the team from doing anything. Yes the caphit technically doubled, but it's only 2 million we're talking about (1 Jarnkrok). The league is back to multi million dollar cap raises per year so the negative of that gets offset
Yes, it's unlikely the Leafs make moves that will take them closer to winning as we have seen. That doesn't mean I'm going to pretend that they're trying to win or what they're doing is good. With or without McCabe this team is out in the first round. He's too old to be a contributor on the team if they were actually trying to win, they don't have the pieces. In about 2 years, people here will be saying he's unplayable.
The point about his cap hit doubling is that (like Nylander last year) they have the same players that are making more money. They are not improving, they are getting worse. If they tried to actually change core pieces? Then we can talk about getting better but they're trying the same team that can't beat anyone at worse prices. Makes no sense except to the bank accounts of a small group of people.
Their window is to win in the next 3-4 years. I don’t see an issue in that time frame. Lots of defenseman play well into their mid to late 30’s and outside of Rielly their caps are all reasonable so moving off them shouldn’t be a problem.Talking specifically about them aging poorly.
He has no clue. A lot of media hacks who never played are similarly clueless.I was saying earlier on an idiot would dislike this McCabe deal. I had the misfortune of hearing Jonas Seigal in a podcast today, so that theory still holds.
Well, he might be good now, however he might not live up to this new deal down the road in a couple of years.
I was saying earlier only an idiot would dislike this McCabe deal. I had the misfortune of hearing Jonas Seigal on a podcast today, so that theory still holds.