Confirmed with Link: Leafs sign F Ryan Reaves (3 years, $1.3M AAV)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Just trying to show you how useless a stat +- is, especially over such an absurdly small sample size. You stick to your narrative though. :)

Play driving stats for that line are absolutely atrocious... what stat do you want? He has 0 points.

You can keep sticking your head in the sand, but that line is bad and negatively impacting the team and he is a big reason.

For those pointing out his -3 stat, has he been the reason they conceded those goals?

His line is getting outchanced significantly, so regardless of the +/- of the line, when he is on the ice, the play is generally in their end, which is not good for winning games.
 
Play driving stats for that line are absolutely atrocious... what stat do you want? He has 0 points.

You can keep sticking your head in the sand, but that line is bad and negatively impacting the team and he is a big reason.



His line is getting outchanced significantly, so regardless of the +/- of the line, when he is on the ice, the play is generally in their end, which is not good for winning games.
So you're making just a big a stink in the Jake McCabe thread, right?
 
So you're making just a big a stink in the Jake McCabe thread, right?

He hasn't been good either, but he is not a new signing who was brought in for who knows what reason... Treliving thinks he can punch his way to the finals, it didn't work in Calgary and won't work here.

McCabe I think is still a serviceable D and an NHL player, Reaves isn't.
 
Last night was LOL .. i could hear Ryan up in row 1 behind net .. dude is very loud .. stands up on bench and says to Perry .. would you like a premature retirement party, no of course not you won't fight brave guy .. that is true policing da game when nothing happens to Matty or Willy
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mclaren55
Play driving stats for that line are absolutely atrocious... what stat do you want? He has 0 points.

You can keep sticking your head in the sand, but that line is bad and negatively impacting the team and he is a big reason.
+- is a pretty bad stat for assessing individual players, in a 3 game sample size, it's worse than useless and you either you get that or you don't. I think you do actually get that, you just can't resist any numbers that support your narrative, even if they are garbage.
 
+- is a pretty bad stat for assessing individual players, in a 3 game sample size, it's worse than useless and you either you get that or you don't. I think you do actually get that, you just can't resist any numbers that support your narrative, even if they are garbage.

So don't answer anything else... play driving stats this year (and virtually every year he has played) have been garbage... I'm giving you real and made-up stats to show how bad he is, tell me which you prefer to use...

I'm not writing him off yet, but people have seen a few fights and a big hit and think he is contributing in a meaningful way, it is funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Da Mash
Watched every game and I agree with him. Being a liability on D does the team no favor no matter how much he yaps from the bench.

If 10 mins of the game …in each game you lose the plus minus game….then how does that help the team? Opposing team intimidated being up a goal when he is on the ice?

Our stars don’t need a body guard in the ice . They all have had great success in the regular season

Playoffs are different as rules change so Reese may be more intimidating but then again…goals are valuable in playoffs and if you are terrible defensively it hurts your team more

JMHO
Funny how +/- means so much to some of you now when it comes to Reaves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mclaren55
I love how posters say plus minus is not a good stat unless they use it to back up their argument then it’s a good stat. You can’t have it both ways.
Plus minus stinks. Im more worried about xGf% and hdcf%, which seem to match up with the eye test that the line is spending way too much time chasing and in their own zone
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days
Funny how +/- means so much to some of you now when it comes to Reaves.
Teams minus players. Toronto Maple Leafs News, Scores, Statistics - Hockey NHL | TSN

1697573064723.png
 
So don't answer anything else... play driving stats this year (and virtually every year he has played) have been garbage... I'm giving you real and made-up stats to show how bad he is, tell me which you prefer to use...

I'm not writing him off yet, but people have seen a few fights and a big hit and think he is contributing in a meaningful way, it is funny.
You're giving me real stats, and made-up stats. Well that's nice, what do you want me to give you a medal or something? :laugh::laugh:
 
You're giving me real stats, and made-up stats. Well that's nice, what do you want me to give you a medal or something? :laugh::laugh:

An intelligent response would be a good start... you are just ignoring that he is bad, which is fine... but then why respond?
 
Last night was LOL .. i could hear Ryan up in row 1 behind net .. dude is very loud .. stands up on bench and says to Perry .. would you like a premature retirement party, no of course not you won't fight brave guy .. that is true policing da game when nothing happens to Matty or Willy
Perfect - he scared the Hawks to a 4-1 victory.
 
Last night was LOL .. i could hear Ryan up in row 1 behind net .. dude is very loud .. stands up on bench and says to Perry .. would you like a premature retirement party, no of course not you won't fight brave guy .. that is true policing da game when nothing happens to Matty or Willy

He policed it so well that Perry scored and the Leafs lost... he is useless
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekes For Days
An intelligent response would be a good start... you are just ignoring that he is bad, which is fine... but then why respond?
It hasn't been established that he's "bad", in order to do that we'd first of all have to agree on how to define the term "bad". Feel free to give us your definition of "bad", I could use the entertainment.

All I've been saying is that you using +- after 3 games to make some sort of point is just ridiculous. An intelligent response would for you to admit that this is correct, you were wrong to mention +- as if it means anything in this context. Instead of manning up to your mistake, you just keep spinning and spinning and spinning.
 
Reaves is useless.

You know when someone is loud and it seems that they are effective because they are loud but in reality they are just there being loud and not really doing much else? That's Reaves.
 
Dear lord you guys complain for
The sake of complaining. Guy has played 3 regular season games, let's judge this when the games start mattering and when the physicality ramps up.
 
Some seem to think he's the only player on the ice when those goals are scored. It has always been debatable though if some actually watch the games and understand what they are seeing.
Notice how nobody has shown any highlights of these plays? Because he has nothing to do with it. Serious debate is one thing, this is just juvenile pot shots, with no context. I wasn’t even a huge fan of the signing, unlike these automated posters, I’ve watched, and frankly he’s been better than expected.

At least wait until he f***s up, which he will, what we’re seeing now, it’s just proof of the agendas, rather than sound hockey analysis. It’s a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leaffan1991

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad