To me it's so dorky and nerdy to argue that the team would be better without Reaves. I watch hockey to be entertained win or lose and I like hard nosed hockey.
I am entertained by Reaves.
A soft team doesn't bring me the full experience. No matter what the roster, every team is likely gonna lose (obviously) and when this team does I'm going to be more entertained with Reaves on the roster. For that reason alone would be nice if people would just let myself and the other mouth breathers have this one.
Yeah I want to see the Leafs win the cup, but if they can't build a cup roster with a guy like Reaves on the team at a relatively small cap hit, then I don't know that I want to watch hockey any more. I don't buy that having any other player that they could have had instead will be the difference to their cup dreams, and if it means they lose in the playoffs again, at least they will hopefully do so while at least breaking even on the scrums for once...