Confirmed with Link: Leafs sign D Oliver Ekman-Larsson (4 years, $3.5M AAV)

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,848
5,665
I low-key followed Arizona for a long time, and I always like OEL. Even when he got to VAN and everyone suddenly hated him, I felt like he was getting the short end of the stick. I wanted him last year after his buy out, and I'm thrilled he's here now.

This guy will have no problem living up to his contract, and could fill in higher on the depth chart when pressed without the slightest hesitation.
 

DraftSchmaft

Registered User
Jul 29, 2021
2,350
2,936
Only two games but he definitely looks like a 2nd pairing guy for us. Looks good alongside McCabe. What I didn’t expect was how strong he is on his skates. Guys try to hit him and he barely moves. Should provide that complementary offense we weren’t getting from our D last year.
This is how I know Nylander is a beast. A few years ago OEL tried to move Nylander and Nylander barely moved. I was like, wait, it's usually the other way around for OEL.

Anyway, back to on topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,048
12,455
This is how I know Nylander is a beast. A few years ago OEL tried to move Nylander and Nylander barely moved. I was like, wait, it's usually the other way around for OEL.

Anyway, back to on topic.

Powerful legs like Crosby.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,830
53,524
The guy played 15 minutes a night on the best defensive team in hockey last year.

He's been a great add and no it isn't too early to say, he's played a 1000 games for a reason. Nice work Tre. This looks the best D core of this era.
 
Last edited:

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,335
16,021
His breakdown last year was
380 minutes top pair with Forsling
109 Minutes mid pair with Montour
460 Bottom pair with Kulikov.
But that's not really true. Not all of his time with Forsling, for example, was in a top pairing role. He only really played top pairing for 16 games at the beginning of the season when both Ekblad and Montour were out, and before Mikkola had established themselves on the team. He also spent time on the bottom pairing with players other than just Kulikov.

It's good that he was able to hold his own in a top pairing role with a strong partner for a dozen or so games, but it doesn't mean a whole lot. We've had a number of lesser players do similar over the years, and it never changed what they were.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,610
9,997
Waterloo
But that's not really true. Not all of his time with Forsling, for example, was in a top pairing role. He only really played top pairing for 16 games at the beginning of the season when both Ekblad and Montour were out, and before Mikkola had established themselves on the team. He also spent time on the bottom pairing with players other than just Kulikov.

It's good that he was able to hold his own in a top pairing role with a strong partner for a dozen or so games, but it doesn't mean a whole lot. We've had a number of lesser players do similar over the years, and it never changed what they were.
His competition profile was exactly that of a midpair defenseman over the course of the season- balance between all levels. A third of his 5v5 minutes against elite level comp.

We havent had a number of former all star 1d level defenders do it as a part of an upswing/ potential partial return to form after a season destroyed by injury.
 

JEI

Jericho
Jun 7, 2004
11,712
701
He's surprised me so far. Hopefully can keep it up. Looks to be a great middle pairing option at the moment.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,610
9,997
Waterloo
The guy played 15 minutes a night on the best defensive team in hockey last year.

He's been a great add and no it isn't too early to say, he's played a 1000 games for a reason. Nice work Tre. This looks the best D core of this era.
Certainly up there- on paper I'd put it even with the 1 year we had healthy ish Muzzin and Brodie.


Tre had a much much better 2nd offseason on paper
 

Commander Clueless

Apathy of the Leaf
Sep 10, 2008
15,811
3,792
I was pretty down on this signing.

Only two games in but so far I'm impressed. Hopefully I was dead wrong.


I think we need one more top 4 guy sometime this season, preferably a righty to replace Liljegren. Or maybe Liljegren himself can become that.

Rielly-Tanev
OEL-???
Benoit-McCabe
Hakanpaa

Would have me pretty confident going in to the postseason.
 

Clark4Ever

What we do in hockey echoes in eternity...
Oct 10, 2010
11,830
8,587
T.O.
Not sure why so many fans are surprised. He was a very highly touted prospect that has had some good years in the NHL but struggled with inconsistency and injuries at times. We signed him coming off of one of his best seasons as a pro after playing a key role on a Stanley Cup winning team and he is still in the prime of his career.

I was optimistic when Tre signed him and he has played as advertised in my opinion.
 

Evilhomer

Registered User
Oct 10, 2019
5,086
4,993
He will likely spend time on PP1 as the season progresses. I expect that he will end up being the second best acquisition of the off-season after Tanev.
 
  • Like
Reactions: banks

ULF_55

Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,231
18,946
Mountain Standard Ti
Visit site
But that's not really true. Not all of his time with Forsling, for example, was in a top pairing role. He only really played top pairing for 16 games at the beginning of the season when both Ekblad and Montour were out, and before Mikkola had established themselves on the team. He also spent time on the bottom pairing with players other than just Kulikov.

It's good that he was able to hold his own in a top pairing role with a strong partner for a dozen or so games, but it doesn't mean a whole lot. We've had a number of lesser players do similar over the years, and it never changed what they were.

Leafs have not had a defender do that on a Cup winning team since since expansion.

Just wanted to add a timeline to your statement.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,830
53,524
Certainly up there- on paper I'd put it even with the 1 year we had healthy ish Muzzin and Brodie.


Tre had a much much better 2nd offseason on paper
The trick I think is don’t over play him. 16-18 feels right on this D core.
 

BM14

Registered User
Dec 7, 2012
6,128
4,227
GTA
Not sure why so many fans are surprised. He was a very highly touted prospect that has had some good years in the NHL but struggled with inconsistency and injuries at times. We signed him coming off of one of his best seasons as a pro after playing a key role on a Stanley Cup winning team and he is still in the prime of his career.

I was optimistic when Tre signed him and he has played as advertised in my opinion.
“Good years” is underselling his previous accomplishments quite a bit. He was routinely “the best player you don’t watch” for a few years because he was stuck in the desert.

His injuries have taken a toll on him and his ability, but he’s still a smart player who should be playing PP1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CincoHolio

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,747
11,581
“Good years” is underselling his previous accomplishments quite a bit. He was routinely “the best player you don’t watch” for a few years because he was stuck in the desert.

His injuries have taken a toll on him and his ability, but he’s still a smart player who should be playing PP1.

He was also pretty misused in Vancouver. They forced into the top pair, on his offside, on a weak D and then wondered when he didn’t perform well. And that’s ignoring all the injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo

HellasLEAF

'93 to Infinity
Sep 14, 2006
15,438
1,878
He looks like a solid steady pro out there. Exactly what we need. Good in all areas. This was an important signing from Tre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lilou

nuck

Schrodingers Cat
Aug 18, 2005
11,614
2,657
This is how I know Nylander is a beast. A few years ago OEL tried to move Nylander and Nylander barely moved. I was like, wait, it's usually the other way around for OEL.

Anyway, back to on topic.
Thats cause OEL was trying to move him into a corner and the boy don't go there:laugh:
 

TMLAM34

Registered User
Oct 15, 2020
5,314
6,314
Get him on the PP1.

Add Knies to the PP1. Put Nylander on the left side. Matthews on the right side.

Stop this awful drop pass wasting 20 seconds per powerplay nonsense.
Replacing Rielly with OEL and then Marner with either Knies or Domi would be great. It also greats some internal competition between PP1 and PP2, something we need IMO.
 

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,424
59,069
He was better than Rielly in his prime. He was overpaid in the canucks market and didn’t do well on offense for them but they liked his defense and willingness to get involved.

As a panther he was a top pair for half the season and was the no 1 ppqb in the finals.

I know he’s not a no 1 D man now , but hopefully a good 2nd pair/pp2.

He looks great. Probably need to manage his minutes but considering all the 8 million salaries now 3.5 is fine.

Lilly as a scratch is unforgivable. 3 million on the bench and you couldn’t find enough for Roy?

Boudreau was on one of the Leaf podcasts this summer and basically said he was utilized in a RD role on the Canucks and struggled defensively because he could be beat on the outside whereas when he’s on his LD he can use his long stick and break things up. Makes sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
81,424
59,069
Wanted him when he signed with Florida. Like that we got him this year but was nervous about the $$$. Looks great so far.

Yeah a one year deal for OEL last year would have been dynamite value vs Klingberg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinto

Ad

Ad

Ad