Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 22,082
- 16,628
Gee, it's almost like all teams have bad games, and it was never about coaching.
Yup maybe it is the players/core and not just the coach.Gee, it's almost like all teams have bad games, and it was never about coaching.
I don’t think the conference final is realistic for this group, without a few significant changes. It’s probably too late to do that now. Their D is still not at that level it needs to be and Rielly is looking worse than ever, and he’s supposed to be their 1D.If the leafs don’t make atleast the conf final, and resign shanahan and marner, there would be no point in hoping for a cup for the foreseeable future
Players have changed too. People just have an unrealistic expectation of what all - even the best - NHL teams do.Yup maybe it is the players/core and not just the coach.
Going into the season 6-5 in October was considered a good start…. and they’re on pace to do that.This is for the “on pace” crowd
We are “on pace” for 93 points
Marner is “on pace” for 82 points
No it wasn't.Going into the season 6-5 in October was considered a good start…
Yup maybe it is the players/core and not just the coach.
That can be proven by the fact that multiple PP coaches and still the PP sucks.
Maybe these players just are not good enough
This is for the “on pace” crowd
We are “on pace” for 93 points
Marner is “on pace” for 82 points
Someone comments this after every loss. At what point does it not become a single game anymore?Is everyone overreacting over a single game? This place is always fun.
I think their play over the first 7 games, as opposed to simply looking at one game, makes it pretty clear that the coaching change has been positive.Gee, it's almost like all teams have bad games, and it was never about coaching.
Someone comments this after every loss. At what point does it not become a single game anymore?
Poor efforts against bad teams is very clearly a trend that goes back years with this core.
I think their play over the first 7 games, as opposed to simply looking at one game, makes it pretty clear that the coaching change has been positive.
I don’t think the conference final is realistic for this group, without a few significant changes. It’s probably too late to do that now. Their D is still not at that level it needs to be and Rielly is looking worse than ever, and he’s supposed to be their 1D.
On the bright side, the rest of the East is still weak and only Ottawa is stepping up from the bottom dwellers so making the playoffs is almost a lock.
While I supported changing up the voice in the room, there's nothing about their play in the first 7 games that "makes it pretty clear that the coaching change has been positive", let alone the massive boost people pretended.I think their play over the first 7 games, as opposed to simply looking at one game, makes it pretty clear that the coaching change has been positive.
I think you are placing too much emphasis on Stolartz and not enough on the fact that the Leafs have generally outplayed the opposition in every game other than last night's game. But no, they aren't going to finish 82-0, and games like last night happen.While I supported changing up the voice in the room, there's nothing about their play in the first 7 games that "makes it pretty clear that the coaching change has been positive", let alone the massive boost people pretended.
I think their play over the first 7 games, as opposed to simply looking at one game, makes it pretty clear that the coaching change has been positive.
I would agree with you that normally this early into a season is too small a sample size, but like I said, this is a trend that goes back seasons.20 games in.
It is the same people saying how different it'll be under Berube and how he is the solution.
I don't think it is unique to this team, but I'd encourage someone to pull up the records of the top 10 teams vs the bottom 10 teams for the last 5 years and see how much worse we are.
They've been good, but not great in the first 7 games.
I don't think there has been much of a difference.
The biggest change is the goalie has bailed them out a few times.
It's been pretty common for the Leafs to outplay their opposition over the last 6-7 years, especially the past ~4I think you are placing too much emphasis on Stolartz and not enough on the fact that the Leafs have generally outplayed the opposition in every game other than last night's game. But no, they aren't going to finish 82-0, and games like last night happen.
If that's not realistic, then when the hell are they going to make a run? When the core is all 30, and making absurd money? So if it's not realistic now, then it will never be. The ship might have sailed then on this core. Remember, teams stop making runs once their core gets expensive. I wouldn't even begin negotiating with Marner unless he and the rest of them lead this team far this spring.
Timing wise, after the Matthews draft, they should be in their window; however the core has always made too much money, and they didn’t draft enough pieces to fill in around them. Also they've never had a great defensive corps and I don’t think they do now, either. Not to mention, from what we’ve seen in 8 yrs, nobody knows if Matthews Marner and Nylander are good enough to win in the playoffs. It’s still really hard to win and we don’t know if they have the will and skill to push through.If that's not realistic, then when the hell are they going to make a run? When the core is all 30, and making absurd money? So if it's not realistic now, then it will never be. The ship might have sailed then on this core. Remember, teams stop making runs once their core gets expensive. I wouldn't even begin negotiating with Marner unless he and the rest of them lead this team far this spring.
Not early in the season it hasn't been. In fact, very much the opposite to start seasons. But it's the nature of this place. One night earlier everyone was tripping over themselves to say how great the team was against Tampa. Just as it was an over-reaction to that game, so is today an over-reaction to the Columbus game.It's been pretty common for the Leafs to outplay their opposition over the last 6-7 years, especially the past ~4
In particular, the Atlantic is looking like it has come down to the rest of the league. Florida and Boston look very ordinary.On the bright side, the East isn’t great and so far they are playing much more entertaining hockey this season.
I think you are placing too much emphasis on what you hoped going into the season, instead of what's actually happening. You are correct that we are not going to finish 82-0, and yes, games like last night happen to every team (and it has nothing to do with any of the things people like to point at), but we have not outplayed the opposition in every game (at least not more than we usually do), and goaltending had been masking some issues.I think you are placing too much emphasis on Stolartz and not enough on the fact that the Leafs have generally outplayed the opposition in every game other than last night's game. But no, they aren't going to finish 82-0, and games like last night happen.
I felt that Florida would take a slight step back after winning and Boston won on goaltending last year and wouldn’t continue at the same pace this season, which makes it almost a lock for the Leafs to make the playoffs.Not early in the season it hasn't been. In fact, very much the opposite to start seasons. But it's the nature of this place. One night earlier everyone was tripping over themselves to say how great the team was against Tampa. Just as it was an over-reaction to that game, so is today an over-reaction to the Columbus game.
In particular, the Atlantic is looking like it has come down to the rest of the league. Florida and Boston look very ordinary.