LeafEgo
Registered User
- Oct 8, 2021
- 1,283
- 1,159
I think the thinking was we tried that but it didn't work. So we gave up a bit on skill points against the competition for more parity in other parts of the game. Being tied in the skill wise department with just a few of the other top teams isn't a bad thing.Speed, or lack thereof from the backend if / when Holl McCabe Schenn are in the lineup at the same time will be a huge concern. Saw McCabe's lack of speed with my own eyes tonight. A pattern is emerging where we make the team much worse in our attempts to inject more physicality. I stand by my opinion we should have just went all in skill and chased guys like Kane after O'Reilly. We will actually be relatively the best in that department so we can get away with being softer than opponents. Now we're just tied skill wise and weaker in other areas compared to our first round (edit - playoff) opponents.
I mean, I really like McCabe from an isolated point of view, he's a dress-and-forget reliable bottom pairing D...was he the best move based on our team makeup and 1st round opponents?.....highly doubt that. This game sort of showed that. We didn't capitalize on the finishing touch after adding O'Reilly and the cash flow for trades evaporated into thin air on things we shouldn't have chased (Sandin counts as cash flow for trades).
(Let me be clear I want more physicality, I just don't agree with how we do it and the final outcome of the roster based on everything)
I feel more comfortable trying to grind out a playoff series win like everyone else then trying to win on skill alone with the possibility of getting neutralized by basics of the game like forechecking, collapsing, etc. because we didn't meet the minimum threshold in other areas.
We probably should have kept more speed though.
Last edited: