Mess
Global Moderator
He is fine he retuned 10 minutes later and played the rest of the game.
Just took a friendly fire shot right in the knee.
But that isn't how it is used, or looked at.
An excuse is not the purpose, but there's no benefit to ignoring the fact that there is a certain level of inherent randomness in hockey outcomes. And if a disparity becomes the trend, you probably have a goalie problem.inherent randomness of hockey came into play
See that's where it is a built in excuse.
Regarding #2, this is simply what happens when you have to play Rielly against top competition. He can't handle it. It's definitely not a TJ Brodie problem, he's actually been fine. It appears teams target Rielly's side because of how bad he is on straight man-to-man defense.As I've said in the trade thread.. I see two main problems. (Matty's issue will fix itself).
1. Muzzin was our shutdown D pair... He made Holl look like a passable second liner, and NHLer... without Muzzin, Holl isn't the former, and not sure he's the latter.
2. Brodie doesn't seem capable of babysitting Rielly anymore. Morgan has never been good defensively, might have actually gotten worse. I don't know if that's a Brodie problem, or Morgan problem.
I'm not even sure how this gets fixed if Muzzin is done. It would be an extremely tough, and unpopular move, but I feel like Mo and Holl should go, bring in Chych to replace Mo and then a Murphy/Mayfield for a new shutdown pairing...
I wonder the same (highlighted). @JT AM da real deal suggests maybe he isn't in great shape.It is used that way on this site.
Matthews doesn't have to change anything because his expected results are good.
Again, I didn't see last nights game, but the games I've seen haven't shown a positive light on what I've witnessed from Matthews. He's shooting yes, but they just look like shots than anyone can take. So because there was a shot there was an expectation it could go in.
I questioned earlier whether or not he's 100%.
Regarding #2, this is simply what happens when you have to play Rielly against top competition. He can't handle it. It's definitely not a TJ Brodie problem, he's actually been fine. It appears teams target Rielly's side because of how bad he is on straight man-to-man defense.
Muzzin is the best defensive player on the team who also happened to be a physical beast. There is nobody on the organization who can replicate what he brings. The whole team is going to suffer with his absence just like it did last year.
Acquire a D who can comfortably play against top competition alongside Brodie, find another cheap Lyubushkin type to pair with Rielly and play them against lesser competition, and wait until Liljegren returns to reunite the Gio-Lilly pairing.
We have virtually no cap flexiblity and this is about the best thing we can do to improve the D.
The gap between the have (playoff teams) and have-nots (non playoff teams is certainly closing.I'm really starting to think the Leafs will miss the playoffs this year. They're average at best, and the previous bottom feeders of the conference are starting to turn things around.
The team obviously didn’t play well, but Clifford especially hasn’t proven to provide any positive value to this team in over a year. Have NAK or ZAR been good this season? No, however both thus far have provided more than Clifford.Imagine watching that garbage and the only criticism you can find is Clifford and Simmonds played.
And in those 6 minutes he and Simmer were leading the way with hits. Like what're your expectations for your 4th liners.like I mean how you can point the blame on Clifford and everyone else gets a pass, wow that pushing some weird agenda. Clifford played 6 minutes and change lmao!
Reality is the team doesn't have the horses to win most nights when AM and MM don't produce.The team obviously didn’t play well, but Clifford especially hasn’t proven to provide any positive value to this team in over a year. Have NAK or ZAR been good this season? No, however both thus far have provided more than Clifford.
NAK, for example, had 11 goals in 67 games last season, that’s more than Clifford’s last 3 seasons combined (144 GP).
Roster decisions made from an intangible belief, that hasn’t been consistently proven true, is hurting the team more than it is helping. Irrespective of the fact that the rest of the team needs to be better.
Not to mention my comment was tongue in cheek anyway. Obviously there are bigger concerns right now than the 4th line.
Mason Marchment for Smurf Malgin. What a true find Malgin is, what a steal. Where would be be without him.Kerfoot's selfish penalties are killing us. Jarnkrok is legitimately useless. There's actually no point of him. Kyle's genius coming into play again. All these people saying we have so much depth are out to lunch.
We're probably the most shallow in the division. The bottom 6 sums Kyle up really well. No rhyme nor reason. Just bargain big players spewing out from all directions.
What an absolute terrible job of constructing a roster.
The team obviously didn’t play well, but Clifford especially hasn’t proven to provide any positive value to this team in over a year. Have NAK or ZAR been good this season? No, however both thus far have provided more than Clifford.
NAK, for example, had 11 goals in 67 games last season, that’s more than Clifford’s last 3 seasons combined (144 GP).
Roster decisions made from an intangible belief, that hasn’t been consistently proven true, is hurting the team more than it is helping. Irrespective of the fact that the rest of the team needs to be better.
Not to mention my comment was tongue in cheek anyway. Obviously there are bigger concerns right now than the 4th line.
Nicolas Aube-Kubel has played 5 games posting 0-0-0 points with -2 +/- & 4 Pims & ATOI/G = 9 minutes and has registered 1 shot on goal.
and yet.............Understanding the reasons for failure assists in succeeding in the future.
I'm really starting to think the Leafs will miss the playoffs this year. They're average at best, and the previous bottom feeders of the conference are starting to turn things around.
And those 4 cornerstones are now on their way to 30 years old.Reality is the team doesn't have the horses to win most nights when AM and MM don't produce.
We built a team around 4 cornerstones. The rest has minimal impact on our outcomes.
After watching the game I PVR'd this morning, I could not believe how truly horrendous Rielly was. No regard for playing defence, out of position up ice, not boxing out around the crease, etc, just brutal. Defence overall was just awful.One of the worst games of Rielly’s career.
Kyle Clifford has played 2 games posting 0-1-1 points with +1 +/- & 2 Pims & ATOI/G = 7:54 minutes and has registered 2 shot on goal.Exactly… 5 games
Nobody's talking about who's provided more value over the last year.The team obviously didn’t play well, but Clifford especially hasn’t proven to provide any positive value to this team in over a year. Have NAK or ZAR been good this season? No, however both thus far have provided more than Clifford.
NAK, for example, had 11 goals in 67 games last season, that’s more than Clifford’s last 3 seasons combined (144 GP).
Roster decisions made from an intangible belief, that hasn’t been consistently proven true, is hurting the team more than it is helping. Irrespective of the fact that the rest of the team needs to be better.
Not to mention my comment was tongue in cheek anyway. Obviously there are bigger concerns right now than the 4th line.
During the regular season you can get away with it enough to qualify for the playoffs, but that point of yours really rings true come playoff time, where when you lose you go home.Reality is the team doesn't have the horses to win most nights when AM and MM don't produce.
We built a team around 4 cornerstones. The rest has minimal impact on our outcomes.
It won't come up in media unless Leafs want it too which they don't (contract, feelings, etc) .. and now they are pumping up JT's tires in media (which is really on Willy's back) .. I figure another week of games and practices and he should be fine again .. da Leafs are between a rock and a hard place with Matty .. but to me it speaks to his professional character .. yes he is one of best players in game when he is fit and not injured but when you are da teams best player and you show up to camp like a blimp it sends a loud message to your team mates .. I would be looking to trade him to Oil land or Avs land straight up if that opportunity arose .. if not one of those 2 guys forget it no interest in losing any other deal .. it is possible we expect too much of our players as Canadians where hockey is our religion .. as a season ticket holder and sponsor of team i find it very frustrating to watch now .. you guys can blame depth or blame Mitch or blame Keefer and/or his lines but no pro team is winning when their best player is da 10,000 pound gorilla in da roomI wonder the same (highlighted). @JT AM da real deal suggests maybe he isn't in great shape.
We don't know those answers. I've seen a number of opportunities, where last year he'd bury the shot. He's not this year. He's not doing well in the faceoffs. Is his wonky wrist acting up? I don't know.
Some people on this site may use stats as such, but just because some do, without looking at other things, doesn't invalidate their usefulness. There is more to it... as there should be.