Confirmed with Link: - Leafs Hire Jim Hiller as Head Coach | Page 8 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Confirmed with Link: Leafs Hire Jim Hiller as Head Coach

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Look at the Pacific division during his tenure, damn near 20 wins guaranteed between the Sharks, Kraken, Canucks, Flames and Ducks.
Has Toronto ever been a guarantee to beat lesser teams?

We’ve pretty well monopolized the market on teams we should beat, but don’t.

Without evidence to the contrary, all we have is a .600 winning coach, who hasnt won a Cup (Many cite this as a requirement noting odds against previous Cup winning coaches winning again) who was an assistant during arguably our most promising time and whom the players liked and respected.

Is it ok to be open-minded given the above until proven otherwise?
 
After it came out yesterday that Torts wouldn't be back for Vegas, he's the guy I wanted

Fun fact, when he coached Vancouver, he didn't even live in Canada/Vancouver. He lived across the border and travelled to the rink for practices/games.

No way he was under consideration. People couldn't even live with Shanahan splitting his time between Toronto and New York.
 
I agree with the goat Martin Skoula, a meh coaching hire is fine or anyway very much preferable to giving a big name 5 years so the board won't let you fire them even when you're regularly putting up 2 shots a period for weeks on end
 
People are just angry for the sake of being angry. In his years at LA he inherited a team that played 1-3-1 hockey and it worked so he continued it. It's boring as all hell, but even looking at their personnel its not overly surprising they were forced into that type of game. This is a team that was forced into making Kuzmenko a top-line F because they had no "great" offensive players outside of Kempe and Fiala.

My two main hesitations from what I've seen of the ~45 Kings games ive tracked over the last 3 years:
- He doesn't give kids that deserve it enough trust (Byfield, Clarke) and has shown to prefer grindy defensive players (Moore, Laferriere, Danault) to take large minutes.
- 1-3-1 hockey while effective with the right group, is so, so boring.
 
We finally found out what head coach will be the lowest paid Head Coach in the league next year. Rogers making sure they save a buck. I will say this now. The Leafs will be at least 10 million under the cap too. Rogers will run this thing like Ballard did in the late 70's early 80's. Dirt cheap.

Honestly, this would not surprise me. Rogers made a tons of cuts to their offices and will be doing it with the Leafs. Already made cuts to the Sports Science staff on the team last year or maybe before that.

Heard Ed Rogers only cares about the Blue Jays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stealth1
You think that’s the key to success? I wouldn’t look at Edmonton at how to do things. You’re missing the point. It’s Toronto Maple Leafs first not Auston and Willy first. If that was the deciding factor we’re cooked.

Your best players liking their coach generally is important yeah. Edmonton is just one example, this no doubt happens all over the league. Star players being consulted on things is not at all unusual.

I’m not sure anyone said it was the deciding factor, just an important data point.
 
Fun fact, when he coached Vancouver, he didn't even live in Canada/Vancouver. He lived across the border and travelled to the rink for practices/games.

No way he was under consideration. People couldn't even live with Shanahan splitting his time between Toronto and New York.
Torts lived in the US when he coached in Vancouver?! Where was he living?
 
The insiders didn’t know Hillier was being considered and now they’re telling us about the process and who was consulted.

There are no insiders. There are only guessers and fortune tellers who occasionally get things right and never mention when they were wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Metroid
I expect the insiders will bash this signing simply because nobody told them he was a candidate. Egotistical turds.

I never once heard his name the last 2 weeks, not one bloody time. Won't stop people from jumping to conclusions why he was hired in their negative way.

Maybe, just maybe... he sold himself the best?

Are you talking about the insiders or the good chunk of posters on here? :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: freshwind
This is a high floor, low ceiling type of hire imo. They don’t have their 1st rounders the next 2 years, so they want to be in the hunt for a playoff spot. Hiller can get a team there… not sure there’s more upside after that.

I’d take him over Eakins or Roy.

Pavelski would have been too risky, I would of went with Woodcroft.
 
People are just angry for the sake of being angry. In his years at LA he inherited a team that played 1-3-1 hockey and it worked so he continued it. It's boring as all hell, but even looking at their personnel its not overly surprising they were forced into that type of game. This is a team that was forced into making Kuzmenko a top-line F because they had no "great" offensive players outside of Kempe and Fiala.

My two main hesitations from what I've seen of the ~45 Kings games ive tracked over the last 3 years:
- He doesn't give kids that deserve it enough trust (Byfield, Clarke) and has shown to prefer grindy defensive players (Moore, Laferriere, Danault) to take large minutes.
- 1-3-1 hockey while effective with the right group, is so, so boring.

Yeah with this team probably injecting a little more youth from the Marlies + #1 draft pick, I hope he's a lot more willing to give them responsibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocker13 and Albz
Torts lived in the US when he coached in Vancouver?! Where was he living?

Point Roberts

1781704250489.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad