Its pretty wild with our storied history and 13 cups we've only seen five 100 point seasons from a player, and only three players in total - one of them being Matty.
Confirmed with Link: Leafs extend Keefe
- Thread starter shaner8989
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Dreakmur
Registered User
100 points doesn’t always mean the same thing.
Gilmour’s 127 point season was good for 8th in the league, and 21 players scored 100+ points that season.
Jimmy Firecracker
Backcheck, Forecheck, Paycheque.
True. But in '94 his 111 points was good for fourth in the league, and only 8 players hit the 100 point plateau that year.
Yeah and they were all on other teams is what I'm saying. I guess they didn't have 100 point players with shorter seasons through our cup winning years though.
notDatsyuk
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2018
- 11,736
- 9,857
Dreakmur
Registered User
Dreakmur
Registered User
It’s not just point totals. How many leafs have been top 5 in points league wide?
Last edited:
notDatsyuk
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2018
- 11,736
- 9,857
You don't think winning the Vezina has merit because it is based on actual numbers rather than being voted for?
I guess Matthews didn't deserve the Richard because it was awarded based on goals rather than votes?
Dreakmur
Registered User
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 82,535
- 61,031
Keefe’s regular season coaching record is impressive in the way that Chris Osgood’s win totals were impressive for Detroit. He does some things well, has his flaws but you know the record is skewed because of a very talented roster that thrives in regular season play. It’s not like he’s Scotty Bowman every night.
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 82,535
- 61,031
The Vezina isn’t based on stats, BTW. That’s the Jennings. Which is kind of the companion trophy and no one cares about it.
notDatsyuk
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2018
- 11,736
- 9,857
Not exclusively, and scoring isn't exclusively an individual stat.
I should have said 'had' rather than 'has'. We were talking about the six times Leafs goalies won it, which was long before the Jennings.
Dreakmur
Registered User
Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 82,535
- 61,031
My mistake I didn’t know I was stepping into a historical debate.
acrobaticgoalie
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2014
- 3,468
- 3,561
Not Keefe related but Spittin Chiclets just posted that one of the first things Babcock did getting to Columbus was ask the players to see their phones and go through their photos to see what kind of people they are. Starting with Captain Boone Jenner.
To think that there was still people defending Babcock. His antics are f***ed up and he obviously hasn't learned a thing.
To think that there was still people defending Babcock. His antics are f***ed up and he obviously hasn't learned a thing.
TMLBlueandWhite
Go Leafs Go
- Feb 2, 2023
- 2,188
- 2,268
Extending Keefe was terrible management.
I'm not saying firing Keefe is the answer to the problem. But I'm not not saying it either. It's bullshit to save the "fire the coach" bullet.
They're supposed to be doing everything they can to win.
Keeping Keefe is an insult to a fan base desperate for success. Ether they're stupid or they think we are. Likely both.
Well Momma didn't raise no sucker.
Ain't ain't a word. Cause ain't ain't in the dictionary. Gullible, however, IS a word.
I looked it up.
I'm not falling for the same thing again. The reason the results are the same every playoffs is because Keefe keeps making the same mistakes. Blaming the players for predictable ineffective systems ignores the real problem.
That's Keefe.
Just because every coach since Quinn has been garbage doesn't mean this one isn't too.
I'm not saying firing Keefe is the answer to the problem. But I'm not not saying it either. It's bullshit to save the "fire the coach" bullet.
They're supposed to be doing everything they can to win.
Keeping Keefe is an insult to a fan base desperate for success. Ether they're stupid or they think we are. Likely both.
Well Momma didn't raise no sucker.
Ain't ain't a word. Cause ain't ain't in the dictionary. Gullible, however, IS a word.
I looked it up.
I'm not falling for the same thing again. The reason the results are the same every playoffs is because Keefe keeps making the same mistakes. Blaming the players for predictable ineffective systems ignores the real problem.
That's Keefe.
Just because every coach since Quinn has been garbage doesn't mean this one isn't too.
Mugzy97
#StandWitness
I'm still thinking we need a new coach in here. Keefe just doesn't seem to be getting the best out of this roster. It's the same issues to start this season that it has been for years. Team looks disinterested for 50 mins and then turns it on for the last 10 when it is too late.
I think leafs nation had him on a short leash to begin the season already. If we don't start winning the close games by a quarter way through the season he should be gone.
I think leafs nation had him on a short leash to begin the season already. If we don't start winning the close games by a quarter way through the season he should be gone.
Ianturnedbull
Registered User
- Jun 11, 2022
- 6,289
- 5,823
Mess
Global Moderator
Former Leaf Kris Versteeg highlighted this in his recent appearance on the JD Bunkis Podcast this week, stating that Keefe playing some of his depth guys between 10 and 11 minutes, you're simply not going to get the most out of them and you're going to put yourself in a position where only half the team is engaged.
"[Sheldon Keefe does not] trust any of [his] depth to play, and I've been looking at this - it's a recurring theme from last year, the year before... you need to get guys extended, trusted minutes to get them in the game. If you expect Max Domi to score with 11 minutes [on the ice], or Matthew Knies with 10-and-a-half minutes... it's not going to happen and you cannot trust guys to give everything in 10-and-a-half minutes and be offensively relied on. That's something I looked at right away was the ice time.
With that type of coaching, if you're going to lay the hammer on the top guys and not find these bottom guys extended minutes and you're going to take that philosophy, again, into the playoffs, it's going to be a hard one to win with."
"[Sheldon Keefe does not] trust any of [his] depth to play, and I've been looking at this - it's a recurring theme from last year, the year before... you need to get guys extended, trusted minutes to get them in the game. If you expect Max Domi to score with 11 minutes [on the ice], or Matthew Knies with 10-and-a-half minutes... it's not going to happen and you cannot trust guys to give everything in 10-and-a-half minutes and be offensively relied on. That's something I looked at right away was the ice time.
With that type of coaching, if you're going to lay the hammer on the top guys and not find these bottom guys extended minutes and you're going to take that philosophy, again, into the playoffs, it's going to be a hard one to win with."
Mugzy97
#StandWitness
Well yeah, I would have fired him and kept Dubas. I think we canned the wrong guy.
Our 7th-9th forwards played 14-15 minutes per game last year and the year before. It's not a recurring theme at all. Treliving just messed up our depth, despite taking from our defense and goaltending to allocate more money there.
Christ stop rubbing it in the only coach that looks asleep while talking to you f*** tml for bring him back to damn cheap to get a good coach one that can get the team up and ready to play 60 min or you sit in the box and that starts from matty right down to brodie
Suntouchable13
Registered User
WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 34,414
- 12,572
This might just be chalked up to an over reaction from tonight's game but it's a general feeling I've had for a while, even though I know "it's early".
There is too much carry over from previous teams that disappointed to this year's version of the Leafs.
Keefe is a big part of this feeling, I know people are going to point at the winning % etc but the same people will say this is a really talented team, shouldn't you be able to win the majority of your games with the roster we have?
Does anyone else feel the same? Is it fair to Keefe? Is it on the players? Are they both equally disappointing or are we still going to go with "It's early" ?
There is too much carry over from previous teams that disappointed to this year's version of the Leafs.
Keefe is a big part of this feeling, I know people are going to point at the winning % etc but the same people will say this is a really talented team, shouldn't you be able to win the majority of your games with the roster we have?
Does anyone else feel the same? Is it fair to Keefe? Is it on the players? Are they both equally disappointing or are we still going to go with "It's early" ?
