Nucklehead Supreme
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2011
- 4,387
- 2,377
i also cheered for auburn against fsu
fite me irl
you *******! LOL
i also cheered for auburn against fsu
fite me irl
He is totally flip flopping on this, we all know what he initially wrote.
Oh I totally agree, but I believe that this would be a bad move for both teams. Especially considering the history with Andersen and the Canes, and the leafs need for a #1 Goalie. Hopefully your team has found their guy finally.
I'm not totally sold on Andersen's upside, but the floor looks to be pretty high as well. Should at least be a 5 year stopgap to develop a star goalie, and that's probably the timeframe it's going to take the leafs to get to contention level anyway. Seems like a lot to give up, but Anaheim fans seem pretty sold on the guy so I think him playing in the southwest US also limits his exposure/hype a bit
I always thought Bernier played well there, just stuck behind a god awful blue line, was he really that bad?
I always thought Bernier played well there, just stuck behind a god awful blue line, was he really that bad?
Another terrible offer from Carolina.
Shocker
Another terrible offer from Carolina.
Shocker
Another terrible offer from Carolina.
Shocker
Because this proposal was clearly made by a Carolina fan, as are the majority of awful proposals involving the canes.
Great post.
I'm not sure I even remember the last time I saw a proposal on here that was actually from a Carolina fan. Our forum spends too much time mocking the Trade Board to actually participate in it.
I think the OP is a leafs fan, what are you even talking about?
Another terrible offer from Carolina.
Shocker
Another terrible offer from Carolina.
Shocker
to be fair, the OP doesn't have anything on their avatar that identifies their allegiance and I wasn't a fan of the trade from a leaf perspective.
If anyone read this thread, it's clear I'm a Leafs fan high on Aho....
Except he makes no sense for us, much like your proposal. We need our starter, and as good as Aho is we are pretty deep at forward. We need D at the expense of surplus forwards and forward prospects, not by trading our starter