It's more that I don't like the who concept of who "deserves" to win, and don't usually even mention it. It's a sporting event, and at the end of the day who "deserved" what matters for nothing.
I mean, why is it that we didn't deserve it? Why isn't it, "Toronto created an enormous amount of chances but could only pop one past the backup, they absolutely deserved to lose the game!" Did Toronto play well, or did they play poorly? I think you can look at it either way. Same from our side.
So in the end, forget all the subjectivity and "deserving" ****. We played 60 and for various reasons came out a 4-1 winner. I don't know why anything
more needs to be said.