I agree only 18 games have been played and we shouldn't be expressing anything with extreme certainty at the moment. I'm sure you called out anyone judging the team after 6 games in the same measured way. I tended to mostly stay away from the extreme toxicity of the delusional threads going on around then as they were basically equivalent to arguing Buffalo was going to be a 120+ point team and made a fool of most involved but I'm sure you were on board after only a few games in the same way you are looking at the big picture now right? We certainly needed more voices to calm folks down during that time and the few posts I made ran along the lines you are saying right now.
The team is on a 114 point pace right now and has won 10 of 11 games, is top 5 in the NHL for points since the start of the 2017 season and actually has more to give offensively when their shooting% normalizes. We all know Atlantic is the best division in hockey (and the Leafs have put up those points in the best division in hockey the whole time)but I just want to confirm that you want to go on record as saying that even if the Leafs finish 4th in the division with 114 points (which is actually possible looking at how good those 4 teams are), you would still call them a bubble team. That doesnt seem very measured (especially as they are 2-0 vs the other 3 teams so far) but I'm sure you have a reason why you would want to use wordplay here.
It's also kind of you to point out other teams key injury struggles to support your arguments and I'm sure you're hoping the Leafs don't suffer the same level of catastrophic injury they faced in last year's playoffs, the worst rash of playoff injuries of any playoff team in recent memory. Tavares brutal injury, Matthews wrist, Foligno rendered useless with a freak injury, Muzzin going down again. The way you put emphasis on that for other teams lends me to believe you must really have defended the Leafs on this point and I just havnt seen it but I'm sure it's out there right?