GDT: Le Train De L'Optimisme! - Devils @ Canadiens, 7:30 PM EST, MSG+2 (AGAIN!?)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cult of Hynes

Hynes is never wrong.
Nov 9, 2010
13,369
2,979
One, nothing Cory can do there. That was interference and it's a ******** goal because of that whole "not in the crease ********." Yet I have no doubt that if it was Price that had his glove hand knocked into like that they call it a no goal.

If Schneider's skates are in the crease, like they were, it should be irrelevant where his glove hand is because he still should have the opportunity to play aggressive and try to get his glove a bit out of the crease area to make a glove save, which happens all the time when goalies play far out. Just a bad call to say it is a goal.

Schneider has not looked right to me though. He still seems to be fighting the puck and to see it.
 

bobilly45

Registered User
Jan 1, 2013
4,155
979
I really dont understand how that isnt goalie interference.

I honestly think if there was no high-sticking review it would have been ruled goalie interference, but the refs didnt want to look like idiots calling "good goal" on ice, "good goal" on no high sticking, then "no goal" on challenge.

There really wasn't any interference
 

Devilsfan92

Registered User
Jan 4, 2008
14,170
108
I thought the offside shoulda been challenged before goalie interference, Cory was interfered with but outside the paint. Looked offside
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,638
46,403
First person I have ever ignored on this site, just nothing to contribute...

I think that could have gone either way. For sure if it was our team that scored it would have been overturned for the Habs, unfortunately just how this league works.

PAP!
 

Bleedred

#FIREDAVEROGALSKI
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
133,546
63,255
Michel the Monster is already considering challenging for goalie interference LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad