LD Zeev Buium - University of Denver, NCAA (2024, 12th, MIN)

MuckOG

Registered User
May 18, 2012
15,706
5,717
The Top D in this draft were all excellent prospects. One was bound to fall and I’m not surprised it was the smallish LHD. @Dack perfectly summarized how team needs and existing handedness played into the slip as well.

I do think Minnesota needs to prioritize getting a big RHD now. The blueline is small with Faber, Brodin, Buium, Spurgeon.

I wouldn't consider Faber "small" at 6'1" 200 lbs at just 21 years old. He's not going to punish many players, but he's plenty strong along the boards and can more than hold his own in front of the net.
 

MNRube

Registered User
Oct 20, 2013
6,392
3,354
I wouldn't consider Faber "small" at 6'1" 200 lbs at just 21 years old. He's not going to punish many players, but he's plenty strong along the boards and can more than hold his own in front of the net.
True but he’s not an ideal biggest D in your Top 4. You want one bruiser. I think Middleton is a 5 on a contender
 

SoupNazi

Gee Wally/SoupNazi 2024
Feb 6, 2010
26,865
16,417
Any more politics and you can expect a warning and a forum ban from the prospects forum for at least a week.
 

MTL Dirty Birdy

Registered User
Aug 29, 2021
1,222
1,298
The Top D in this draft were all excellent prospects. One was bound to fall and I’m not surprised it was the smallish LHD. @Dack perfectly summarized how team needs and existing handedness played into the slip as well.

I do think Minnesota needs to prioritize getting a big RHD now. The blueline is small with Faber, Brodin, Buium, Spurgeon.
Spurgeon is the only truly small D there. As the games getting faster people have to get ready to see less of an obsession with size like in the 90s
 

MuckOG

Registered User
May 18, 2012
15,706
5,717
True but he’s not an ideal biggest D in your Top 4. You want one bruiser. I think Middleton is a 5 on a contender

Agreed. My only point is that there are more categories of size then just "big" and "small". There is a "medium" or "average" category as well. I would place guys like Faber, Brodin and possibly Buium in that class. Spurgeon is the definition of "small".
 

mphmiles

Registered User
Jan 1, 2017
669
1,164
True but he’s not an ideal biggest D in your Top 4. You want one bruiser. I think Middleton is a 5 on a contender
Colorado won a cup with a top 4 that averaged sub-6 feet with the tallest at 6-1. (And none of Makar, Toews, Girard, or Byram were anywhere close to a “bruiser”)

You need a good top 4. They don’t have to have any specific style or size. Vegas won with size and physicality. Colorado won with speed and skill.
 

MaKarter

Big Game Bo
Jun 21, 2019
2,812
4,092
Fort Collins CO
Colorado won a cup with a top 4 that averaged sub-6 feet with the tallest at 6-1. (And none of Makar, Toews, Girard, or Byram were anywhere close to a “bruiser”)

You need a good top 4. They don’t have to have any specific style or size. Vegas won with size and physicality. Colorado won with speed and skill.
Girard was injured Game 3 of the second round.

Toews- Makar
Byram- Manson
Johnson- Johnson
 

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,750
4,331
Maybe I would have if the height of their D mattered more than their Cap circumvention in their cup wins.
What punishment did the NHL hand down for VGK’s cap circumvention?

Perhaps ignorance really is bliss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

Zubrus Coffee Maker

Blinded by my Zubrus
Nov 14, 2008
5,695
580
Cobourg, ON
Colorado has a generational Defenseman in his prime. Not saying you need size or anything on defense, but that can certainly sway the line in your favour as far as team construction.

For Buium, I was sad the Devils passed on him. He looks like the prototypical modern defenseman, and I believe hes going to have a tremendous career
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry44

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,332
21,225
MN
Colorado has a generational Defenseman in his prime. Not saying you need size or anything on defense, but that can certainly sway the line in your favour as far as team construction.

For Buium, I was sad the Devils passed on him. He looks like the prototypical modern defenseman, and I believe hes going to have a tremendous career
Silayev is perfect for NJD. They need a defensive stopper, and the size is an added bonus.
 

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,244
9,402
NYC
www.youtube.com
For Buium, I was sad the Devils passed on him. He looks like the prototypical modern defenseman, and I believe hes going to have a tremendous career
I'm not tracking the last several pages of this thread, so apologies if this has been 200 times...but Philadelphia has Drysdale, York, to a lesser degree, Andrae...

NJ has Casey and Nemec...

As much as you like BPA all the time, there's a bit of an exception sometimes...you don't want too many of that guy...

So, just the lineup of teams in a row probably contributed a bit to him falling out of the top 10 or whatever.
 

Boxscore

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 22, 2007
14,588
7,631
I'm not tracking the last several pages of this thread, so apologies if this has been 200 times...but Philadelphia has Drysdale, York, to a lesser degree, Andrae...
Yes. But Drysdale has been oft-injured and didn't set the world on fire once traded to Philly. Granted, he should be given the keys to PP1 for good, but the jury is still out on how productive he will be... or if he can remain durable and healthy for long stretches.

York is a good young player. Hopefully, he could be a solid top 4D on a contender down the line.

Andrae is unproven and 5-9... and maybe 185 with rocks in his pocket.

If the above is the reason the Flyers passed on Buium for a reach in Luchanko... Briere and the entire scouting staff should be jettisoned before the 25 draft.

The last 4 players to win the Norris are Q. Hughes, Karlsson, Makar, and Fox. None of them are big, physical D. In fact, three of them are the same size (or smaller) than Buium. And, Buium outproduced three of them in the same league at the same stage of development. Heading into the draft, every reputable scout had Buium going high in the draft (some even had him ranked 4th overall) and everyone pegged his upside as a high-end, 1D.

If Drysdale, York, and Andrae were the reason the Flyers passed on the next Adam Fox, it will likely set the franchise back 8-10 years... unless Luchanko defies logic, reasoning, and every credible projection and emerges into Joe Sakic 2.0.

"Drafting for need" is a Cardinal Sin and the Flyers made it in year 2 of a franchise-altering rebuild, after landing their biggest franchise face since Eric Lindros. How they did not swing for the fences once Buium fell into their laps is mind-boggling, to say the least.
 

Larry44

#FlyersPerpetualMediocrity
Mar 1, 2002
12,130
7,640
I'm not tracking the last several pages of this thread, so apologies if this has been 200 times...but Philadelphia has Drysdale, York, to a lesser degree, Andrae...

NJ has Casey and Nemec...

As much as you like BPA all the time, there's a bit of an exception sometimes...you don't want too many of that guy...

So, just the lineup of teams in a row probably contributed a bit to him falling out of the top 10 or whatever.
Drysdale and York are nowhere near Buium’s level. Passing on Zev because of them was malpractice. #FlyersPerpetualMediocrity
 

Kalv

Slava Ukraini
Mar 29, 2009
23,937
11,765
Latvia
Drysdale and York are nowhere near Buium’s level. Passing on Zev because of them was malpractice. #FlyersPerpetualMediocrity
I have no idea, but didn't Flyers pass on a NCAA guy more than anything else? (See - Gauthier's situation).

I just assumed so, but I really don't have any idea
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
58,949
25,348
New York
Drysdale and York are nowhere near Buium’s level. Passing on Zev because of them was malpractice. #FlyersPerpetualMediocrity
I would not be so sure that Buium will be better than Drysdale. Drysdale drafted way earlier and has done well other than the injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry44

Erep

Registered User
Jul 17, 2019
1,450
1,621
I have no idea, but didn't Flyers pass on a NCAA guy more than anything else? (See - Gauthier's situation).

I just assumed so, but I really don't have any idea
I mean, you can argue about the actual reasons, or whatever, but this is the public explanation from Briere:

"Well, when you look at our defense, you have it right. I think Zeev Buium is gonna be a great player, and he’s someone we considered strongly. But with Cam York, Jamie Drysdale, Emil Andrae – at some point, it gets tough to go with the smaller guy. But he’s a fantastic player"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

DANOZ28

Registered User
May 22, 2012
7,018
455
nearest bar MN
well im still bouncing off the walls like a little kid on xmas morning! if buium is as good as or maybe even better than faber we have 2 of 4 top D for the next 8-10 years.
 

thedjpd

Registered User
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2002
3,656
915
San Jose, CA
Drysdale and York are nowhere near Buium’s level. Passing on Zev because of them was malpractice. #FlyersPerpetualMediocrity

Really silly take.

Drysdale was rated above Buium during his draft year and the first dman taken, and went on to put up 30+ points as an 18 year old in the NHL.

Buium was so highly rated that he was the 6th dman taken in his own draft class. Drysdale has obviously seen his stock drop due to injuries, but that’s really the only reason. It’s not like the talent is gone - he’s barely played 2 seasons worth in 4 years. There’s still plenty to develop.

I get that this is HF and all, but the hype on Buium is getting out of hand - and this comes from a Flyers fan would have preferred they took him. I also get that GMs mess up, but it’s pretty hard to justify he’s the best dman in his class at the moment any way you look at it.
 

Peasy

Registered User
May 25, 2012
17,439
15,958
Star Shoppin
Really silly take.

Drysdale was rated above Buium during his draft year and the first dman taken, and went on to put up 30+ points as an 18 year old in the NHL.

Buium was so highly rated that he was the 6th dman taken in his own draft class. Drysdale has obviously seen his stock drop due to injuries, but that’s really the only reason. It’s not like the talent is gone - he’s barely played 2 seasons worth in 4 years. There’s still plenty to develop.

I get that this is HF and all, but the hype on Buium is getting out of hand - and this comes from a Flyers fan would have preferred they took him. I also get that GMs mess up, but it’s pretty hard to justify he’s the best dman in his class at the moment any way you look at it.
Nah it's really not that hard to justify lol. A lot of people would have had him as their top d going into the draft and him falling to 12th shouldn't change that opinion. And if it does, then your opinion was fickle to begin with.

I'll be shocked if Drysdale becomes a top tier nhler at this point. Weird talking about a guy and what he was considered during his draft when we are 4 years past that. A lot can change in 4 years and it clearly has for Drysdale. Would you still talk so highly of Kakko?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Larry44

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad