FreeMcdavid
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2019
- 2,187
- 2,614
That’s not how it works.
thats not how what works?
That is literally the trade that went down
That’s not how it works.
thats not how what works?
That is literally the trade that went down
thats not how what works?
That is literally the trade that went down
You can be glad your team made a deal that you like without being an ass about it.
thats not how what works?
That is literally the trade that went down
For sure middle eastern ancestry.
They panicked because the rangers took the guy they desperately wanted — apparently not desperate enough to pick him literally one spot before where they chose Mercer. Schneider is very low upside and they picked multiple players the previous year with his skill set.So this was the pick that the Canucks gave up for JT Miller?
Vancouver is doing cartwheels right now.
Its quite obvious that NJ panicked and had its eyes on Schneider with the 19th pick until NYR traded up and swag jacked them.
Dont like this pick at all.
Hugo Anefelt with the 71st pick has a bigger chance of making the Canucks regret the Miller trae IMO
Okhotyuk is an easy one to remember when you break it up.
At a bar you see 3 options:
Ok Hot Yuk
Mukhamadullin is much harder but I broke it down into Muk Ham A Dullin, almost sounds like a Gaelic song.
The rest of your division is doing cartwheels that Holtby is your starting goalsFist pumps at least!
JT Miller 27 yrs old 69 gp -72 pts, 17 playoff games 18 playoff points.
ridiculously affordable contract 5.2 mil for 3 more years
FOR
Marec Maranzec
Shakir Mukhmadhullin
Hugo Alnefelt
Ya carthewheels
They panicked because the rangers took the guy they desperately wanted — apparently not desperate enough to pick him literally one spot before where they chose Mercer. Schneider is very low upside and they picked multiple players the previous year with his skill set.
I don’t love this pick but it’s much better than a Schneider pick would’ve been.
The rest of your division is doing cartwheels that Holtby is your starting goals
This is the most pointless thing to discuss in this thread and all you’re doing is trying to piss people off. This is about the prospect, not a trade made last summer between 2 different teams.So this was the pick that the Canucks gave up for JT Miller?
Vancouver is doing cartwheels right now.
Its quite obvious that NJ panicked and had its eyes on Schneider with the 19th pick until NYR traded up and swag jacked them.
Dont like this pick at all.
Hugo Anefelt with the 71st pick has a bigger chance of making the Canucks regret the Miller trae IMO
I don’t love this pick but it’s much better than a Schneider pick would’ve been.
I don’t need to rationalize anything. They were comfortable overdrafting a guy with big bust potential and massive upside because they already chose 2 studs earlier in the 1st round. They were never using their 3rd 1st on a low potential player like Schneider. Enjoy McIlrath 2.So you rationalize the pick that Schneider’s range of outcomes is small and Mukhamadullin’s range of outcomes is big? That’s some weak reasoning.
i mean he is not wrong. it's very unlikely mukhamadullin will ever make it on a canucks roster.This is the most pointless thing to discuss in this thread and all you’re doing is trying to piss people off. This is about the prospect, not a trade made last summer between 2 different teams.
Not sure what Holtby has to do with the thread
Also, Holtby isnt our starting goalie,
Demko is..... have you heard of him?
Pete DeBoer blamed Vegas' inability to score against Dallas on... Thatcher Demko - Article - BARDOWN
I don’t need to rationalize anything. They were comfortable overdrafting a guy with big bust potential and massive upside because they already chose 2 studs earlier in the 1st round. They were never using their 3rd 1st on a low potential player like Schneider. Enjoy McIlrath 2.
I didn’t like the pick. Again, I’m not “rationalizing” anything. It’s just plainly the case that he has more potential than Schneider and a lower floor. I get the pick, understand the risk they were willing to take, and trust the front office. Concern troll elsewhere.I'm merely questioning what you said. There's no need to be abrasive. You clearly feel pressured here about this situation.
While I agree that the Devils did well enough with their first two picks, teams don't or at least shouldn't pick guys outside of their draft range just because another player who went in that range theoretically has a smaller range of outcomes. You can try to convince yourself that Mukhamadullin could be Bobby Orr or a 3rd pair KHL guy in 10 years, but rationalizing it as completely "boom/bust" doesn't make a pick any better.
By nearly all accounts, the Devils majorly reached here. They probably don't think so, but it's really hard to say they didn't, unless one is in the Devils PR department. It's really poor rationale that because you believe Mukhamadullin has a bigger range of outcomes than Schneider that picking Mukhamadullin was a better idea than Schneider (or many players in that range for that matter). It's very likely that the better prospect has the bigger upside.
There's obviously a chance the Devils are right about Mukhamadullin and everyone is wrong. There's probably some chance he becomes a star defenseman, but the chances are a lot higher that players you think have a smaller range of outcomes and "low upside" become a star for the simple matter that they are better right now, and with some further development of their skills, they can improve their ceiling. People mistype these guys that are said to be boom/bust because of athletic tools. It's not as simple as if they turn on a switch, they'll be star players. Some of them never actually have the upside to be star players, even if they reach their ceiling.