LD Mikhail Sergachev (2016, 9th, MTL; traded to TBL)

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
I'd rather have someone that needs to learn when and when not to join the rush than someone who needs to learn the skills to join the rush and be offensive.

Have you watched Chychrun? he knows when to join the rush and when not to. That coast to coast stuff is not going to fly at the NHL level, especially if he is getting beat on the backcheck.

It's not like it's can't be taught but it will be one of the reason Sergachyov will be back in Junior next year, Chychrun more likely then not will make the jump the he NHL.
 
Chychrun is arguably a top 5 guy. If Sergachev is worse than him, that's nothing to be ashamed of.
 
Have you watched Chychrun? he knows when to join the rush and when not to. That coast to coast stuff is not going to fly at the NHL level, especially if he is getting beat on the backcheck.

It's not like it's can't be taught but it will be one of the reason Sergachyov will be back in Junior next year, Chychrun more likely then not will make the jump the he NHL.

yea but not alot dman have the ability to do that.. its a nice tool to have in your arsenal.

im sure he'll eventually dial it back once hes in the NHL (and its not like its thats his main weapon or anything, his slapper is gonna be his bread and butter in the NHL), same thing happened w/ Subban.

in regards to Chychrun, i actually dislike how he's been less assertive this season. he's very hesitant to join (or lead) the rush this season, that wasnt the case last year. hes playing way more safe atm.
 
That coast to coast stuff is not going to fly at the NHL level, especially if he is getting beat on the backcheck.

Some interesting videos:





and so on.....

It's not like it's can't be taught but it will be one of the reason Sergachyov will be back in Junior next year, Chychrun more likely then not will make the jump the he NHL.

Yea, Serg still is a bit raw, but I really don't see anything wrong with that Serg will spend another 1-2 years in OHL. It's necessary for his development. And I can't imagine Chychrun will be in NHL next year, seriously. And even if he will, I dont think he will be able to have an impact on the games like rookie Ekblad.
 
Besides Lidstrom...any other comparisons? (just curious!).
NHLers/Ex-NHLers...style/skating/ceiling,etc.


Cheers

For the all-aroundness and physical tools I've been comparing Sergachyov to Vladimir Malakhov, don't remember him making those puck rushes though. :)
 
Some interesting videos:





and so on.....



Yea, Serg still is a bit raw, but I really don't see anything wrong with that Serg will spend another 1-2 years in OHL. It's necessary for his development. And I can't imagine Chychrun will be in NHL next year, seriously. And even if he will, I dont think he will be able to have an impact on the games like rookie Ekblad.

It might not be Ekblad good, but he could probably be used like Seth Jones and Hanifin were in their rookie years.
 
Besides Lidstrom...any other comparisons? (just curious!).
NHLers/Ex-NHLers...style/skating/ceiling,etc.


Cheers

Tough to say. There is no straight comparison for him. But in some ways he reminds me of Roman Josi and John Carlson a bit. Anyways he is pretty unique defenseman.

For the all-aroundness and physical tools I've been comparing Sergachyov to Vladimir Malakhov, don't remember him making those puck rushes though. :)

That's a good one too.
 
For the all-aroundness and physical tools I've been comparing Sergachyov to Vladimir Malakhov, don't remember him making those puck rushes though. :)

Malakhov huh? I kinda like that comparison. Malakhov was very smooth skating and handling the puck, and had a big shot too.
 
The first interview footage of Sergrush™ was posted to YouTube on February 5[sup]th[/sup]:



He doesn't have a hacker-tier command of English like Ivan Provorov, but he'll be fine.
 
Last edited:
His english seems ok (actually© better than mine :D) for boy, who even didn't know a word at start of the season. Also he's really nice person. And I didn't understand, why his first goal wasn't counted? Puck didn't cross the line or what?
 
The first interview footage of Sergrushâ„¢ was posted to YouTube on February 5[sup]th[/sup]:



He doesn't have a hacker-tier command of English like Ivan Provorov, but he'll be fine.


Nice, I've heard lots of people say he speak good english already and it seems he really does. Came over in july and already speaks that good english is just a proof to how dedicated this kid is. I mean, there are guys that's been in the NHL for years but still don't speak very good english. No "russian factor" with this kid at all, he seems to enjoy himself very much in North America.
 
Nice, I've heard lots of people say he speak good english already and it seems he really does. Came over in july and already speaks that good english is just a proof to how dedicated this kid is. I mean, there are guys that's been in the NHL for years but still don't speak very good english. No "russian factor" with this kid at all, he seems to enjoy himself very much in North America.

Some people are just more gifted at learning languages, and the younger you start the easier it is...although if you have an ear for the auditory patterns in different tongues, you can continue learning languages quickly throughout your life; especially if you immerse yourself in it.

Not questioning his dedication at all; just don't think his english is proof of that one way or the other.
 
Some people are just more gifted at learning languages, and the younger you start the easier it is...although if you have an ear for the auditory patterns in different tongues, you can continue learning languages quickly throughout your life; especially if you immerse yourself in it.

Not questioning his dedication at all; just don't think his english is proof of that one way or the other.

You're right, it's not definitive proof one way or another but to me it's indicative of a very good attitude and work ethic. You have guys in the NHL like Nikita Nikitin (well, AHL now) who just never bothered to learn the language and relied on Tyutin to translate for him in Columbus, and there's lots of other russians who have been in the same situation. Having Mikhail come over early and really trying to adapt to North America is nothing but positive for me.
 
This kids my favourite player in this draft, if the Canucks are picking in the 7-10 range I'm hoping they select him.

I had a really good feeling that they were going to take Boeser last year, and I have that same feeling about Sergachev.

Unfortunately, the other dude who called the Boeser pick (Ahmon) is high on Clayton Keller this time around. No big deal.
 
This is a very good player. Love his game. From what I've seen he seems to be the total package; would it be so wrong to state that? I see a player that skates strong with a smooth stride. Great shot and playmaking abilities. Has very good vision and IQ. Ultra composed player that utilizes body position so well. Not to mention his great attitude and is driven to play in the best league in the world.

I didn't watch Provorov last year but it seems to me like Sergachyov is having the same impact in his draft year (playoffs tbd). Should be a lock in the top 10 imo.
 
He went Leon Kowalski mode on Rymsha. "Wake up. Time to die." :laugh:

I love that he's got snarl to his game. Love it, love it, love it.
 
Last edited:
He didn't have his best game against Ottawa. Took some bad penalties, got pasted into the boards by a smaller guy on a clean hit and had to leave the ice, had a brutal giveaway in the middle of the ice, and he didn't release from the weak side on the first goal.

But it's just one game. He's been generally solid - more so than Stanley. Any issues he has are fixable.

Similar to Provorov, no doubt.
 
He didn't have his best game against Ottawa. Took some bad penalties, got pasted into the boards by a smaller guy on a clean hit and had to leave the ice, had a brutal giveaway in the middle of the ice, and he didn't release from the weak side on the first goal.

But it's just one game. He's been generally solid - more so than Stanley. Any issues he has are fixable.

Similar to Provorov, no doubt.

Not that it was a bad game from him but I would say it was slightly below average for his standards, a little too casual all around and he was trying some of his "arrogant plays" throughout the night where he makes a harder play than he has to just because he can.

He was much more in control of Sunday's game against Kingston, he was dialled in from puck drop in that one and was very, very good when the refs weren't trying to take over the game. Zipping passes tape-to-tape and using his skating and stick to shut down rushes and turn it the other way before they could get it started.

His poise can be his best friend and worst enemy at times, huge upside! His notable sense of anticipation with and without the puck can look like casualness when it's not firing on all cylinders, he has to find a way to make his non-dominant nights or stretches in a game work for him instead of trying to ramp up the degree of difficulty for himself, but when he is on he looks absolutely brilliant like the game revolves around him!
 

Ad

Ad