- Feb 24, 2003
- 29,961
- 3,055
Last half or so of podcast discusses hearing, fall out. One key point:
Why did Hockey Canada settle without finishing their investigation? Friedman's lawyer contacts believe that due to underage drinking and the fact that it was a Hockey Canada event, they were liable (and mainly why insurance didn't pay out).
Why didn't they compel players to participate in investigation? (Perhaps the NHL will be able to compel participation?)
The excuse from Hockey Canada is that since players are on loan or "borrowed" from junior teams, Hockey Canada couldn't compel them to participate/cooperate with the investigation. They of course left out, and tried to dance around the question when asked, the fact that they could have made future participation with HC contingent on cooperating with investigations.