Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
Past-Lives-2.jpg


Past Lives (2023) Directed by Celine Song 6A

Nora and Hae Sung are childhood friends in Seoul where they share a special bond. Nora's family emigrates to New York where she becomes a playwright. Years later the old friends mutually contact one another, and it is clear their bond remains undiminished. Though at long range, their lives become entangled once again. Eventually Nora calls a halt to their trans-oceanic conversations, fearing that they are beginning to interfere with her work in New York. Twelve more years go by and they meet again in New York for a short time. Hae Sung has just broken up with a girl friend and Nora is now married and her American husband is understanding but also feels a little threatened by the potency of their relationship. Indeed Hae Song and Nora's bond seems only strengthened by their absences. But what can they do about it?

Past Lives is a fine movie about fate, regret and the roads not taken, and I wish I could recommend it whole-heartedly because there is so much that is worthy of praise about the film. But the direction drove me crazy. The movie is so relentlessly tasteful, so spare, so feng shui, so full of leisurely pans and unnecessary grace notes, that it seems interior decorated to death. And the New Age-y score, nearly always tinkling in the background, certainly didn't help either. In the hands of Hong Kong's Anne Hui, Past Lives might have been a near masterpiece. Despite her errors in judgement, director Celine Song does manage to deliver a moving and powerful story anyway, but Past Lives should have been even more moving and powerful than it is. That being said, I think many will love this romantic film anyway.

subtitles and English
 
Last edited:

Chairman Maouth

Retired Staff
Apr 29, 2009
26,444
13,277
Comox Valley
Heat (1995)
Seen it before. You've all seen it before. Just watched it again for the umpteenth time, maybe more times than I've ever watched any movie. The nose-to-nose interactions between De Niro and Pacino have been forever immortalized in the history of cinema.

It's just an exquisitely acted and directed film. It is peak Michael Mann, De Niro and Pacino, with honourable mention to Tom Sizemore. I uncover new layers of this film which impress me more every time I watch it. Last night it was the paralleled Pacino and De Niro interactions with their women. De Niro is building on a new relationship; Pacino's third marriage is failing. This is paradoxically symbolic of the different trajectories these two men's lives are on.

Much has been written about the coffee shop scene, where Pacino and De Niro, like two armored medieval jousters on horseback, face each other down in what one knows will almost certainly result in the death of one of these two men. It is truly one of the most epic scenes in cinematic history, but it is only one of many in Heat. Most films have no truly memorable, truly epic scenes which live on to immortalize its host in cinematic history. Some have one. Rarer films yet, which occupy the upper atmosphere and echelons of film lore, may have two. Films in the upper stratosphere have more. Heat has at least three.

In the port shipping yard, Pacino exclaims, "We just got made!" Those four words signal the climax of one of the greatest scenes in cinema history. Then, shortly after, De Niro, from behind a camera on a building top and in response to Pacino's exclamation, smiles, and you know you have just witnessed film making at its finest. You just witnessed the encore to Pacino's climactic exclamation, and it was delivered using only a smile. The scene is 95% Pacino, but it is De Niro at the end who drives home the coup de grâce, the fatal thrust of the jousting lance. That's why I rate Michael Mann so highly in regards to this film. He pulled the best out of two of the finest actors who have ever lived. Mann is smart enough to know that sometimes you just need to get out of the way and let the racehorses race.

The bank robbery is the greatest bank robbery scene in cinematic history. I've never robbed a bank, but if I had I am certain that the events would have been very similar — brutal, murderous chaos, with Mann bringing the very best out of every actor he utilizes in his film. Indeed, the actors don't even appear to be acting; they appear to be testifying.

Another example of Mann's brilliance is his devotion to character minutiae. After exiting the bank, Tom Sizemore's character Michael Cheritto gets into a getaway car and peers out the window — his image in the side window from the outside distorted by reflections that the movie viewer must strain to make sense of, and symbolic of the viewer, us, not knowing the moral character of the man we are seeing. The answer to the question of the man's moral character is effectively answered only moments later when Michael Cheritto takes a six-year-old girl hostage and uses her as a human shield. Heat is brilliant in its unexpected plot developments, and as is so often the case in real life, in its unexpected character developments that one never sees coming.

"A guy told me one time, don't let yourself get attached to anything you are not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the heat around the corner." — Neil McCauley, Heat.

And in the end, it is Neil McCauley's love for Eady that has him denying the advice he once valued so much that takes him down. It is simply something that Neil wasn't willing to walk out on in 30 seconds which seals his fate.

As it turns out, in spite of all of the violence and all of the murder and all of the mayhem, in the end, Heat is simply a love story.







Screenshot (1779).png

women.
 
Last edited:

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,745
2,389
I Like Movies (2022) - 7/10

Decent budget Canadian indie and when I say budget I really mean budget cos it's supposed to be set in the early-2000s but they couldn't bother to change much of the scenes to reflect that including multiple shots showing very obviously newish cars. Anyways it has an unlikable lead as the protagonist but everyone around him keeps the movie engaging, especially his female manager who's given a relatable portrayal as both a flawed character and the one to move the story forward. Anyways the film never gets too pretentious or up its own arse and isn't boring either which is all I can ask from a modern indie.

My Sassy Girl (2001) - 7/10

Korean dramedy rated highly due to probably its final half hour as the rest of the film is mediocre and somewhat outdated. I chuckled at a lot of the scenes but I can easily see why some may find the abusive girlfriend to be problematic now. Still, it's fairly easy-going Korean cinema for the most part.

Libeled Lady (1936) - 7/10

It's not a screwball but it's sort of a screwball. Spencer Tracy starts out as the protagoniost till William Powell takes over the film, the scenes with him and Myrna Loy are far more joyous than the more tedious scenes with Tracy and Jean Harlow. I guess having four top billing stars must have made this a hit but again, it's the Powell/Loy chemistry which is what leads the film more than the silly premise or the convoluted ending.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,190
65,536
Ottawa, ON
And in the end, it is Neil McCauley's love for Eady that has him denying the advice he once valued so much that takes him down. It is simply something that Neil wasn't willing to walk out on in 30 seconds which seals his fate.

As it turns out, in spite of all of the violence and all of the murder and all of the mayhem, in the end, Heat is simply a love story.

I have a profoundly different take.

Both cop and criminal were inherently selfish people which is why they have so much difficulty with relationships.

McCauley regards women as disposable and for Hanna they are a distraction away from his true love which is facing off against criminals. At the same time, it is this obsession that makes them the best at what they do.

In the end, McCauley could have gotten away with his lover but revenge against Waingro trumped that, eating up those valuable minutes and ending any chance of escaping with Eady.

Neither man was ever willing to really put their women first, and I think there’s a necessary element of loneliness concerning their existence.

Another aspect of the film that I valued (I won't go over the elements you've already covered admirably) is that they did a pretty impressive job in establishing backstories and personalities for all of the criminal crew, if not all the cops. Tom Sizemore with his family, the struggle of the ex-con driver.

And yet, the film doesn't back away one bit from ensuring that the audience is aware that they are hardened criminals and ruthless murderers. They don't shirk from killing unarmed people, shooting at cops among many innocent civilians, and taking a child as a hostage.

The juxtaposition of Sizemore eating happily with his family and yet willing to put a child in harm's way is chilling.

A lot of movies, when they try to "humanize" the criminals, they avoid having them act recklessly or harm civilians. Not so with this film. They are brutal and uncompromising.

Anyway, I also watched this film this week so it was funny to see your review.
 
Last edited:

Chairman Maouth

Retired Staff
Apr 29, 2009
26,444
13,277
Comox Valley
I have a profoundly different take.

Both cop and criminal were inherently selfish people which is why they have so much difficulty with relationships.

McCauley regards women as disposable and for Hanna they are a distraction away from his true love which is facing off against criminals. At the same time, it is this obsession that makes them the best at what they do.

In the end, McCauley could have gotten away with his lover but revenge against Waingro trumped that, eating up those valuable minutes and ending any chance of escaping with Eady.

Neither man was ever willing to really put their women first, and I think there’s a necessary element of loneliness concerning their existence.

Another aspect of the film that I valued (I won't go over the elements you've already covered admirably) is that they did a pretty admirable job in establishing backstories and personalities for all of the criminal crew, if not all the cops. Tom Sizemore with his family, the struggle of the ex-con driver.

And yet, the film doesn't back away one bit from ensuring that the audience is aware that they are hardened criminals and ruthless murderers. They don't shirk from killing unarmed people, shooting at cops among many innocent civilians, and taking a child as a hostage.

The juxtaposition of Sizemore eating happily with his family and yet willing to put a child in harm's way is chilling.

A lot of movies, when they try to "humanize" the criminals, they avoid having them act recklessly or harm civilians. Not so with this film. They are brutal and uncompromising.

Anyway, I also watched this film this week so it was funny to see your review.

I got some shit to do that's best not put off so I will have to get back to you. I don't want to just write up some haphazard half brain-dead shit that I don't put much thought into.

I shall return.
 
Last edited:

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,190
65,536
Ottawa, ON
God, you guys really make me want to see the movie again, like tonight. :DD

I also find the pacing excellent, even with all of Michael Mann's "blue tinged atmospheric moments" that he's kind of famous for.

I put it on fairly late, not expecting to finish it in one sitting, but lo and behold, it was over.
 

Chairman Maouth

Retired Staff
Apr 29, 2009
26,444
13,277
Comox Valley
I have a profoundly different take.

Both cop and criminal were inherently selfish people which is why they have so much difficulty with relationships.

McCauley regards women as disposable and for Hanna they are a distraction away from his true love which is facing off against criminals. At the same time, it is this obsession that makes them the best at what they do.

In the end, McCauley could have gotten away with his lover but revenge against Waingro trumped that, eating up those valuable minutes and ending any chance of escaping with Eady.

Neither man was ever willing to really put their women first, and I think there’s a necessary element of loneliness concerning their existence.

Another aspect of the film that I valued (I won't go over the elements you've already covered admirably) is that they did a pretty impressive job in establishing backstories and personalities for all of the criminal crew, if not all the cops. Tom Sizemore with his family, the struggle of the ex-con driver.

And yet, the film doesn't back away one bit from ensuring that the audience is aware that they are hardened criminals and ruthless murderers. They don't shirk from killing unarmed people, shooting at cops among many innocent civilians, and taking a child as a hostage.

The juxtaposition of Sizemore eating happily with his family and yet willing to put a child in harm's way is chilling.

A lot of movies, when they try to "humanize" the criminals, they avoid having them act recklessly or harm civilians. Not so with this film. They are brutal and uncompromising.

Anyway, I also watched this film this week so it was funny to see your review.

"McCauley regards women as disposable and for Hanna they are a distraction away from his true love which is facing off against criminals. At the same time, it is this obsession that makes them the best at what they do."

McCauley just needed to find the right woman, and he did. His timing was just a little off. Him and Eady were going to settle down. I will grant you though that until McCauley reached that point in his life when he was ready to retire and settle down with Eady, that like Hanna, for him the job was everything - until he met Eady and then it wasn't.

"In the end, McCauley could have gotten away with his lover but revenge against Waingro trumped that, eating up those valuable minutes and ending any chance of escaping with Eady."

Yeah that goes back to your point about obsession. Agreed. That cost him.

After reading your post this morning I don't really have much of anything to disagree with. I agree about the character development you talked about, Sizemore, who always plays a great crook, and the humanization of the characters. I thought my reply would be longer and we might have something to argue about. :laugh:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NyQuil

Ben Grimm

What if everyone tended to their affairs?
Dec 10, 2007
25,159
6,312
Savile Row
My Top 6 Michael Mann Movies
1. The Jericho Mile
2. Thief
3. The Keep
4. Manhunter
5. LA Takedown
6. The Last of the Mohicans
 

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,788
4,924
screenshot_20230106-152106_facebook.jpg

Heroes of Telemark-1965

Beautifully shot on location in Norway, a true story of WWII. The race to build the first atomic bomb and the heavy water required are at the centre of the plot. Folks that enjoy a good war story like Operation Crossbow or Where Eagles Dare might enjoy this one. You can tell that really was Kirk Douglas and Richard Harris at times rolling around in waist deep snow. Some of the real participants were in the film. Pretty good tale.

screen-shot-2015-12-09-at-11-19-01-pm.png

The Hidden Fortress-1958 (subtitles)

Another Kurosawa film set in feudal times but much different then some others. Told through two peasant farmers who entered a war zone for profit but ended up on the wrong side. On the way home they find gold bars and the real story begins. Such a contrast to have so much humour in a AK film. These two are really funny, reminding me of Laurel & Hardy. Wonder how many times Toshiro Mifune played a general? He's stellar again here. George Lucas has said this was an inspiration for Star Wars. Great film.

tumblr_npfjm1d9ck1rtj3uto1_1280.jpg

Midway-1976 & 2019 (2019: english & subtitles)

The story of the WWII naval/air battle in the Pacific.

The 1976 film has a galaxy of hollywood legends & familiar faces, much like The Longest Day. And shot all in english. To recreate the scale of the battle would be impossible, the 1976 film includes a great deal of real footage from the war and the 2019 version is cgi based. In trying to give many angles of the battle the first film is challenging to follow at times as it tries to tell what's happening in several different places at the same time. Thought the remake did a better job of making this clear. The remake gets somewhat video gameish at times but believe it tells the facts well, including going back to December 7, 1941 at Pearl Harbor. The Japanese also speak their native language in the 2019 film adding to the authenticity. The two films have the same 6.7 rating on IMDB, pretty much the way I see them. Both with strengths and weaknesses, found the films complement each other. An important story of WWII.

thegreatsilence_01-1.jpg

The Great Silence-1968 (Dubbed)

'They call him Silence because wherever he goes the silence of death follows.'

This is quite the spaghetti western. Before, there was the man with no name. Here there is the man with no voice, an avenger called Silence. In the hills, a group of wanted bandits hide out, pursued by many bounty hunters including the ruthless Loco (Klaus Kinski). It's a graphically violent film, beautifully shot in a snowy region of Italy. It was filmed in 1968, the plot and bizarre ending were apparently influenced by some of the political events of the time. Intriguing film, there was an alternate ending shot that is on youtube.
 
Last edited:

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,924
10,810
I suppose that I should get off my butt and contribute by at least summarizing what I recently watched.

The Covenant (2023) - 8/10 - Gripping modern war drama, excellently paced, with a good blend of action, suspense, human drama and depth. A good July 4th rental.

Sisu (2023) - 6/10 - Short on plot, devoid of character development, totally unbelievable and just an excuse for 90 minutes of gratuitous violence. Would watch again.

Extraction 2 (2023) - 6/10 - Worth watching for a terrific 20-minute "one shot" sequence in the first half, but the second half could've used... extra action, too. Netflix.

The Menu (2022) - 5/10 - Intriguing first and second courses, but a disappointing third course, followed by just desserts.

65 (2023) - 5/10 - I didn't think that I could find myself bored by a movie with spaceships, guns and dinosaurs.

The Mother (2023) - 5/10 - Finally, a generic actioner about a retired, ex-military loner (Jennifer Lopez) that Liam Neeson wasn't allowed to play. Netflix.

Bandit (2022) - 5/10 - Canada's most notorious bank robber (Josh Duhamel) was, no surprise, also the politest bank robber.

Renfield (2023) - 4/10 - The gag of having Dracula's assistant attend group therapy to complain about his boss felt like a 7-minute SNL skit stretched to 90 minutes.

Marlowe (2022) - 4/10 - A 1930s noir about the popular fictional gumshoe, starring Liam Neeson, shouldn't be this stiff and boring.

Peter Pan and Wendy (2023) - 3/10 - Disney once again takes something beloved and recycles it without any of the magic or themes. Disney+.
 
Last edited:

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
No%20Hard%20Feelings%20Trailer.jpg


No Hard Feelings (2023) Directed by Gene Stupnitsky 6A

At its best, R-rated No Hard Feelings bears a slightly off-kilter resemblance to the screwball comedies of the '30s and '40s. The premise is suitably absurd: in danger of losing her home. 32-year-old Maddie (Jennifer Lawrence) accepts a rather off-the-wall job offer from helicopter parents who basically want her to bed their 18-year-old son before he goes off to university in hopes his loss of virginity will transform him into less of a gormless nerd than he is at present. Turns out the kid is not that easy to seduce. The outlandish premise actually helps No Hard Feelings to stand out from the usual predictable movie fare on offer this time of year, a definite plus. For a sex farce, there is not a lot of sex in it, though there is a full-frontal nude scene featuring Lawrence, something I was not expecting. It is tough to know what to say about this scene without potentially offending someone, so I'll just point out it was fun and leave it at that. The rest of the movie's approach to screwball comedy is hit or miss, but there are enough funny or sweet or charming moments to give the film the absolute mildest of recommendations in terms of content--the movie deserves a 5.999999999999999 score if there was such a thing. What I can fully recommend is Lawrence. She has a blast with this role and has great fun being Maddie. Her performance recalls some of the best screwball comedians from the distant past, Claudette Colbert, Carole Lombard, Jean Harlow and so on. With or without clothes on she is a delight to watch even in the movie's not infrequent uninspired patches. I hope Lawrence gets more and better roles like this because she is such a great comic actress.
 
Last edited:

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,732
5,539
smile_review.jpg


Smile (2022) - 7/10

Following a traumatic incident at work, a psychologist begins experiencing the same phenomenon as her patient.

Sosie Bacon stars as Rose, an overworked doctor working in the psychiatric ward of a hospital. One day a walk-in patient named Laura (Caitlin Stasey) complains of seeing "smiling" people that others can't. As Rose tries to comfort her, a traumatic incident occurs which causes Rose to question if what Laura says is actually true. Soon, Rose begins seeing the "smiling" people herself, and must race to figure out what is after her...

Smile was written and directed by Parker Finn, who makes his feature directorial debut. The film is an adaptation of Finn's 2020 short film Laura Hasn't Slept, which also stars Caitlin Stasey as Laura. After the short film gained recognition at the South by Southwest Film Festival, Paramount Pictures hired Finn to create a feature film adaptation.

And the results are good! Smile follows a similar formula to many modern horror films, with a supernatural villain and a lower budget production consisting of a few finite locations (mostly houses). Though it doesn't bring anything new to the horror genre, the film does many things well. The plot is interesting and features mystery elements, with Laura racing to uncover exactly what's stalking her and for what purpose. Speaking of Laura, Caitlin Stasey gives a very strong performance in the lead role, which is crucial because she's in nearly every frame. This is also one of those movies where the odds feel so stacked against the protagonist that it keeps you guessing how it's going to end.

Most importantly, Smile succeeds at being creepy, using something as basic as a smile to unsettle the audience, with some moments genuinely giving me goose bums. Unfortunately that also brings me to my first con, which is too many jump scares. Every horror movie is entitled to a few, but Smile has roughly a dozen and most of them are of the "cheap" variety; i.e. tension is building and then "oh crap!", the phone starts ringing. I also thought some of the dialogue was clunky, or maybe frustrating is a better way to put it. As Rose tries to explain to others what is happening to her, her composed character is suddenly unable to communicate in a coherent fashion, which justifiably leads everyone to think she's crazy. I know that's what the film was trying to accomplish, but I think there were better ways to go about it (like in 2020's The Invisible Man).

Overall, Smile is a solid horror movie. As mentioned, it's similar in formula to a lot of other modern horror films, but does a lot of things well to make itself stand out. I was a little torn on my rating because things like the needless jump scares got on my nerves, but overall the film managed to creep me out so I rated up to a 7. If you're a fan of movies like It Follows (2014) or The Invisible Man (2020), you'll probably enjoy this one.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
Lady Vengeance. I think Park Chan-Wook sometimes directs movies like it's the last movie he's ever going to be allowed to direct. It's a lot of what makes him compelling, but it also can be a little busy and messy.

Chan is Missing. An interesting, low-budget mystery/ramble through early 1980s Chinatown in San Francisco. Interesting peek at a community and culture at a time when there wasn't a lot of attention being paid to it (at least attention on the real people there not the stereotypes). It predates Jim Jarmusch but it very much reminded me of him or Eagle Pennell's movies. A low-pulse hang.

Ocean's Eleven (the Rat Pack one). Full disclosure I've never been much of a Sinatra person and this didn't sway me anyway. Takes way too long to get to the meat of the story and when that happens it's still pretty dull. Laziness abounds. Quick, amusing cameos by Red Skelton and Shirley MacLaine are the only real high points. You get why Soderberg and Clooney thought this was primed for a remake.

Endless Night. A nice little thriller about a striving young man who marries an heiress and builds a modern (1970s) home on a plot of land that might be haunted. Based on an Agatha Christie story it's got a tinge more horror vibes to it (though I wouldn't call it horror) and a good lead performance from a slithery Hywel Bennett with some big discount Malcolm McDowell energy. Supported by the very comely duo of Hayley Mills and Britt Eklund.

The Endless Summer. I'm a sucker for surfing stories and this famous doc has been on my watchlist for a while. It's a bit dorky and old fashioned in today's light (the narration), but as a 1960s travelogue with some really stellar cinematography, it's a pretty compelling visual experience.
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
37,048
59,646
Weegartown
87b8f559dc26e83adcee93113debe88d.jpg


Sphere (1998) - 5.5/10
Watched this for the first time the other night. I would say the first ~hour is promising and then it kind of falls apart. Based on a book by Michael Crichton, with a star studded cast and a massive budget. A Sci-Fi that should have worked better than it did.

Hoffman just didn't seem like a good fit for the role as the main lead, struggled to convey the anxious paranoia that it needed and was a little too calm and collected for losing control of a situation 10,000m under the sea. Stone wasn't great either but her lines didn't give her a ton to work with. Basically they get sent to the bottom of the ocean as a team of scientists to investigate what the Navy believes is a alien spaceship. They encounter a entity that holds some power over them and affects the crew that encountered it, allowing the crew to physically manifest their cognitive thoughts. You could tell what they were going for but the horror component isn't really scary, the thriller component isn't really thrilling, and the sci-fi component just left you with more questions than answers. Suffers from bad editing and a poorly developed script. The effects were definitely a little dated but not too bad. Overall a really sloppy 2nd half takes away from what could have been a quality movie. There's still enough there to keep you engaged and entertained but the highlight for me was Jackson faking out the audience doing the exploding chest Alien scene while choking on a bit of water. Liev Schreiber was good as well, always seem to like him in a supporting role. There's definitely a couple laugh out loud so bad it's good moments, not a irredeemable film but doesn't live up to its potential.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,190
65,536
Ottawa, ON
87b8f559dc26e83adcee93113debe88d.jpg


Sphere (1998) - 5.5/10
Watched this for the first time the other night. I would say the first ~hour is promising and then it kind of falls apart. Based on a book by Michael Crichton, with a star studded cast and a massive budget. A Sci-Fi that should have worked better than it did.

Hoffman just didn't seem like a good fit for the role as the main lead, struggled to convey the anxious paranoia that it needed and was a little too calm and collected for losing control of a situation 10,000m under the sea. Stone wasn't great either but her lines didn't give her a ton to work with. Basically they get sent to the bottom of the ocean as a team of scientists to investigate what the Navy believes is a alien spaceship. They encounter a entity that holds some power over them and affects the crew that encountered it, allowing the crew to physically manifest their cognitive thoughts. You could tell what they were going for but the horror component isn't really scary, the thriller component isn't really thrilling, and the sci-fi component just left you with more questions than answers. Suffers from bad editing and a poorly developed script. The effects were definitely a little dated but not too bad. Overall a really sloppy 2nd half takes away from what could have been a quality movie. There's still enough there to keep you engaged and entertained but the highlight for me was Jackson faking out the audience doing the exploding chest Alien scene while choking on a bit of water. Liev Schreiber was good as well, always seem to like him in a supporting role. There's definitely a couple laugh out loud so bad it's good moments, not a irredeemable film but doesn't live up to its potential.

Solaris under water.
 

Jussi

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
94,942
12,131
Mojo Dojo Casa House
Just a heads up, the movie that got the biggest buzz at CinemaCon earlier this year, was Joyride (original title was Joy f*** Club, which opens this week: Joy Ride

People at CC called it one of the funniest comedies in recent years and apparently it's exceptionally filthy, when it comes to the humor (hence the R-rating). I look forward to downloading it when it hits torrent sites.
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,299
17,384
There follows the first post in a series:

Mission: Impossible (1998)

Televisual nonsense with extremely 1998 CGI. The hacking scene was very tense though.
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,299
17,384
87b8f559dc26e83adcee93113debe88d.jpg


Sphere (1998) - 5.5/10
Watched this for the first time the other night. I would say the first ~hour is promising and then it kind of falls apart. Based on a book by Michael Crichton, with a star studded cast and a massive budget. A Sci-Fi that should have worked better than it did.

Hoffman just didn't seem like a good fit for the role as the main lead, struggled to convey the anxious paranoia that it needed and was a little too calm and collected for losing control of a situation 10,000m under the sea. Stone wasn't great either but her lines didn't give her a ton to work with. Basically they get sent to the bottom of the ocean as a team of scientists to investigate what the Navy believes is a alien spaceship. They encounter a entity that holds some power over them and affects the crew that encountered it, allowing the crew to physically manifest their cognitive thoughts. You could tell what they were going for but the horror component isn't really scary, the thriller component isn't really thrilling, and the sci-fi component just left you with more questions than answers. Suffers from bad editing and a poorly developed script. The effects were definitely a little dated but not too bad. Overall a really sloppy 2nd half takes away from what could have been a quality movie. There's still enough there to keep you engaged and entertained but the highlight for me was Jackson faking out the audience doing the exploding chest Alien scene while choking on a bit of water. Liev Schreiber was good as well, always seem to like him in a supporting role. There's definitely a couple laugh out loud so bad it's good moments, not a irredeemable film but doesn't live up to its potential.
I watched this when I was about 12 and it scared the shit out of me. A man imagines venomous snakes and they just appear. How more terrifying can you get?
 

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,745
2,389
I Married A Witch (1942) - 7/10

Hokey slightly screwball-ish execution but Veronica Lake is adorable (don't do alcohol kids) and that's pretty much the only thing that matters in this film. The romantic angle isn't really well fleshed out but there are some fun outdated visual effects going on. Also worth a watch because it's only 80ish mins which is what these sorts of films should aim for.

Captains Courageous (1937) - 7/10

Spencer Tracey tries to do a Portuguese accent and it features a punchable kid who you're then supposed to like. The problem is that the first third of the film spends so much effort making you dislike the kid that the rest of the film really doesn't work that well. Great film if you're into people yelling about ship and fishing stuff though, I guess.

My Sassy Girl (2001) - 7/10

Really strong final 20-30 mins here which are far more emotional than the sillier precursor portion of the film. I think some people are hating on it because it is a bit outdated at trying to portray an abusive GF as funny but I'll be honest I still laughed a bit. Again, drawn out and ovelry star-gazy like Korean films can be but nice as a whole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,299
17,384
Mission: Impossible 2 (2000)

The world's most charisma-free man and the world's most boring woman fail to build any chemistry for an hour before lots of shooting, rubber masks and extremely drawn out roundhouse kicks. Nonsense, but boring nonsense.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shadow1

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad