Movies: Last Movie You Watched and Rate it | {Insert Appropriate Seasonal Greeting Here}

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,788
4,924
Well put. I'm no expert, but I'll put 2 cents in. I'd suggest Dead Man is not your usual western, and somewhat an acquired taste with the Jarmusch's style given my viewing/thoughts. Might not be an ideal representation, albeit a great film. Ford, Leone, Hawks, Peckinpah, Eastwood, and Mann are generally the most notable directors, all with a bit of their own style and with time related elements. Depends what you want most, positivity, darkness, action, visuals, music, etc. Not a bad place to start off with if going through the genre.
Good points. I liked the originality of Dead Man, it wasn't like any western I had seen. Also liked the way humour was woven into a very dark story...and the music!

I should have mentioned Mexico above. It plays an important role in many westerns like The Magnificent Seven. Interesting that the film is based on the Japanese classic, The Seven Samurai, taking a story from another time & place and converting it into a western. Mexico is the setting too for another favorite The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, love that film.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kihei and OzzyFan

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,299
17,384
Transformers: The Last Knight (2017)

Exactly the same as all the others yet somehow less offensive. I'm just glad I'm done.
 

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
Groundhog Day (1993)
3.25 out of 4stars

“A narcissistic, self-centered weatherman finds himself in a time loop on Groundhog Day, and the day keeps repeating and he can’t figure out why.”
A great fantasy comedy that works the time loop tool with comedic and reflective proficiency. Can be seen as philosophical, existential, or allegorical. Smartly never overuses its repetitiveness to boredom, it joyously covers the real to life angles such a plot device would bring about and allow. Bill Murray, in a seemingly tailor-made role for his style, organically brings ample laughs and fun. A bit of romance is sprinkled in too, but in a comically honest way. Without spoiling anything, while I understand the progression, I am curious about 1 major latter change in Murray’s character’s mindset’s true probability
The Altruism Angle
. Say you run 100 people in that scenario, how many will reach or come across that step? Fun fact, while Murray in the film relives Groundhog Day 38 times in the film, some website states that it would take him roughly 12,395 days to accomplish what he did throughout the film.

The Lost Weekend (1945)
3.25 out of 4stars

“Sober for only a few days, writer Don Birnham is supposed to be spending the weekend with his brother, Wick, to get fully clean. But, eager for a drink, Don convinces his girlfriend to take Wick to a show. Don, meanwhile, sneaks out to his local bar and misses the train out of town. After recounting to the bartender how he developed a drinking problem, Don goes on a weekend-long bender.”
A great film-noir that shows a harrowing realistic tale of addiction under the Hays Code. The film is about alcoholism, but it translates across drug addictions and even other forms of addiction. Tragic, while evoking sympathy, frustration, and disgust altogether. Does an excellent job of portraying addiction’s vicious circle of incessant desperation and temporary highs, devouring souls and corroding relationships. Milland exhibits this through acts of conniving, agitation, mood swings, isolation, and shame. To say addiction is powerful and controlling is an understatement. On top of it all, sobriety is a fragile lifelong road with many difficulties, as well as initial obstacles and withdrawal-symptoms, including delirium tremens. The film was another notable trophy winner too, taking home Oscars for Best Film, Best Actor, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Django (1966)
3.00 out of 4stars

“A coffin-dragging gunslinger becomes embroiled in a bitter feud between a gang of Confederate Red Shirts and a band of Mexican Revolutionaries.”
A great spaghetti western that is pretty much a remake of a remake, solid but clearly inferior. Those films are Yojimbo, the original, and A Fistful of Dollars, the remake of Yojimbo. Comparatively, Django is enjoyably more violent, bloodier, sadistic, and darker, among other differences for better and worse. For arguably better, say at minimum good different, it's the little touches of stuff: like the casket, the surprise in the casket, the mud/quicksand, Nero’s blue eyes, and even the kind of poetic ending in addition to the above. For worse, many narrative strengths are gone and much looser, the side character development is minimal, and most of it doesn’t hold a candle to either of its predecessor films. That said, the sum of the whole is still different, effective, and enjoyable enough. There is some great action/visuals, good direction, good score, and a good lead performance. The film was so graphically violent for its time, the film was banned in numerous countries. Very commercially successful. Ironically, this remake of remake was highly influential on Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez, amongst other things.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,924
10,810
Groundhog Day (1993)
3.25 out of 4stars

“A narcissistic, self-centered weatherman finds himself in a time loop on Groundhog Day, and the day keeps repeating and he can’t figure out why.”
A great fantasy comedy that works the time loop tool with comedic and reflective proficiency. Can be seen as philosophical, existential, or allegorical. Smartly never overuses its repetitiveness to boredom, it joyously covers the real to life angles such a plot device would bring about and allow. Bill Murray, in a seemingly tailor-made role for his style, organically brings ample laughs and fun. A bit of romance is sprinkled in too, but in a comically honest way. Without spoiling anything, while I understand the progression, I am curious about 1 major latter change in Murray’s character’s mindset’s true probability
The Altruism Angle
. Say you run 100 people in that scenario, how many will reach or come across that step? Fun fact, while Murray in the film relives Groundhog Day 38 times in the film, some website states that it would take him roughly 12,395 days to accomplish what he did throughout the film.
The writers (one of whom was the director, Harold Ramis) have been quoted as estimating that he was stuck in the loop for decades, so they roughly agree with the 12,000 day estimates. I imagine that, over that length of time, most people would go through a similar arc: first taking advantage of the situation, then going through a period of depression, then realizing that learning new things and helping others are the only things that alleviate the boredom and bring happiness. So, I imagine that most people would reach that last step eventually, and probably a lot sooner than Phil. :laugh:
 
Last edited:

Babe Ruth

Looks wise.. I'm a solid 8.5
Feb 2, 2016
1,595
697
The Lucifer Complex (1978)

Cool title, but boring movie.
It felt like (literally) two separate, but equally terrible, movies cobbled in to one film. One part was a future man watching a documentary of human history, the other plot was an "action" movie, with a super-spy type fighting neo-Nazis and a geriatric Hitler. Equally strange and lame. On Prime now..
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan and shadow1

OzzyFan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
3,653
960
The writers (one of whom was the director, Harold Ramis) have been quoted as estimating that he was stuck in the loop for decades, so they roughly agree with the 12,000 day estimates. I imagine that, over that length of time, most people would go through a similar arc: first taking advantage of the situation, then going through a period of depression, then realizing that learning new things and helping others are the only things that alleviate the boredom and bring happiness. So, I imagine that most people would reach that last step eventually, and probably a lot sooner than Phil. :laugh:
Thanks for that fact. Speaking of Groundhog Day, I've been getting pretty burnt out and mentally overworked from work lately, I may need to take a little break from reviews.
 

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,788
4,924
aaaa-1.jpg

Throne of Blood-1957 (subtitles)

Akira Kurosawa's version of MacBeth. A general (Toshiro Mifune) receives a prophecy that he will become the next Lord of Cobweb Castle. His wife urges him to act upon it. A thick mist that surrounds the castle creates an eerie atmosphere, as does the pouring rain in the labyrinth nearby, Cobweb Forest, where the general receives the witch's prophecy. The main setting, the castle is impressive, built on Mount Fuji. As in in the other AK films I have seen, nice use of natural sounds throughout. Great climax. Wish we had studied this film in school instead of MacBeth.

screen-shot-2014-04-09-at-5-07-16-pm.png

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade-1989

Indy, his dad and the quest for the grail. Probably could have used stronger villains but it is a family adventure film. Good cast including Sean Connery who brought some lighter moments with Junior (who gets an interesting autograph in the diary). Re-watching the first four films, this one is my favorite.

6502-2.jpg

The Hanging Tree-1959

Doc Frail (Gary Cooper) arrives in the mining community of Skull Creek and sets up shop. He is known by some in town, including Frenchie (Karl Malden), under another name. And they know not to mess with him. A stagecoach is robbed nearby and a lone survivor (Maria Schell) is later found, weak and blinded by the sun. Gary Cooper's second to last western, he's good here. Interesting tale of lust, greed, romance.
 

LeafalCrusader

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
10,307
12,416
Winnipeg
A Bridge Too Far (1977) 2.5/5 stars

Chronicling Operation Market Garden the allied invasion of the Netherlands in order to create an invasion route into Germany.

From Sir Richard Attenborough staring a plethora of big names like Laurence Olivier, Gene Hackman, Sean Connery, Robert Redford, James Caan, Anthony Hopkins etc

There were some good scenes and good performances but overall a very choppy film. It kind of just goes from scene to scene from A lister to A lister. Was very long too.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,924
10,810
A Bridge Too Far (1977) 2.5/5 stars

Chronicling Operation Market Garden the allied invasion of the Netherlands in order to create an invasion route into Germany.

From Sir Richard Attenborough staring a plethora of big names like Laurence Olivier, Gene Hackman, Sean Connery, Robert Redford, James Caan, Anthony Hopkins etc

There were some good scenes and good performances but overall a very choppy film. It kind of just goes from scene to scene from A lister to A lister. Was very long too.
I bought it on DVD without having seen it first, figuring that you couldn't go wrong with so many big names in a war movie, and was similarly disappointed. It felt like an exercise in trying to cram in as many famous faces as possible, rather than in trying to tell the best story. It was watchable for the novelty of it, but not the sum of its parts or something that I've watched again since.
 
Last edited:

Fiji Water

Registered User
Jan 16, 2004
1,572
992
Ordinary People, Robert Redford

I think the younger me would have taken to this movie much like I took to Good Will Hunting back in high school. However, the current me could not connect at all with the melodrama being played out in front of me. Redford's generally boring direction and lack of artistry behind the camera did not help matters. While the performances by all the leads were very good, I just couldn't escape the feeling that I had seen all of these plot points many times before in various other movies and TV shows. Perhaps this film is a victim of its own popularity and the copycats it inspired? Dunno. All I know is that I was anxious for the 2hrs to end, so I could get on with it. The fact that this movie won Best Picture over Raging Bull and The Elephant Man is one of the bigger head scratching decisions the Academy has made...
 

nameless1

Registered User
Apr 29, 2009
18,202
1,020
I'm sure there are multiple interpretations, here's mine: it focuses on a period of westward expansion in the 19th century in North America. From horseback to wagon trains to eventually the iron horse. The people, the natives, settlers, towns folk, land barons, sheriffs, judges, card sharks, gun slingers, dance halls, general stores, saloons, cattle drives, ghost towns, mining camps, Gold!....

Not sure about the lasting appeal in general, late 1950's well into the 1960's westerns ruled tv. And then came the 'spaghetti' westerns from Italian directors with a different view of the west, along with some iconic music. There are still some good films made. I really liked Dead Man-1995 with Johnny Depp, in black and white with Neil Young's score in the background. Maybe the theme of folks often just trying to survive in an inhospitable time and place. I know some folks include more recent stories, referred to by some as neo-westerns. Similar theme just occurring more recently. I think Dirty Harry was an example of the western story brought to the present day.

My favorite western is Once Upon a Time in the West. It's a fable that sums up the west and the arrival of the train. I love westerns with great cinematography, the John Ford films from Monument Valley believe inspired many others, including Sergio Leone in that film.

Edit: Before creating Star Trek, Gene Roddenberry was writing tv shows including for Have Gun Will Travel. Have noticed western themed stories in some early Star Trek episodes.

You all touched on it, but the landscape is just as important to a Western. It has to appear to be wide open, and there has to be an inherent sense of lawlessness. Nowadays, there is a revival of sorts, as filmmakers try to transport the genre to modern days to create a sort of neo-western. For films, No Country for Old Men and Taylor Sheridan's Modern American Frontier trilogy of Sicario, Hell or High Water and Wind River are the most notable examples., while in the land of T.V., Breaking Bad would fit the bill.

Some directors even tried to transport the genre outside of the birthplace of the genre, North America, and set it in their own country. Hong Kong had its own similar genre in Wu Xia, while Korea gave it a shot with The Good, The Bad, and The Weird in 2008, but technically, they are not neo-Western, because they mainly are set in the past. The best example is probably Marlina the Murderer in Four Acts in 2017, set in Indonesia. In fact, it even created its own sub genre, coined as Satay Western by critics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,732
5,539
superman-032316_1458775883590_1141978_ver1-0.jpg


Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (Ultimate Edition) - 6/10

Fearing that an unchecked Superman could cause an apocalypse, Bruce Wayne seeks out a way to neutralize him.

Ben Affleck stars as Batman / Bruce Wayne, who is at ground zero of the Metropolis fight between Superman (Henry Cavill) and General Zod from 2013's Man of Steel. After witnessing the destruction and having a premonition about a post-apocalyptic world ruled by an unhinged Superman, Bruce searches for a way to stop Superman.

Batman v Superman was directed by Zach Snyder, and written by David S. Goyer and Chris Terrio. The film is a follow up to Snyder's 2013 film Man of Steel, and serves as the second film in the DC Extended Universe (DCEU). The Ultimate Edition for this review is the Director's cut of the film, coming in at over 3 hours thanks to an additional 31 minutes in run time. As the first big ensemble film in the DCEU, how does Batman v Superman fare?

It's a huge mixed bag, with nearly as many weaknesses as strengths. The film asks similar questions to the MCU film Captain America: Civil War (2016), questioning who governs the world's heroes, and who holds them responsible for the collateral damage they cause? It's an interesting concept, but the execution is clunky.

Bruce Wayne's motivations for fearing Superman make sense, but Superman / Clark Kent is simultaneously investigating Batman, believing him to be a vigilante who must be stopped. This plotline feels extremely forced and non-sensical, clearly trying to add tension to a movie that already has enough of it. Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) also has adjacent motivations to Batman and Superman, which further muddies the water.

Batman v Superman has an ensemble cast, including Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne, Jeremy Irons, and Diane Lane. Gal Gadot co-stars as Wonder Woman (in the first live action film appearance of the character) as well. Everyone does a good job, but it feels like there are too many characters crammed into this film and too much going on. Remember how Marvel did stand alone movies, and then united everyone in the Avengers? Well, in this film, Wonder Woman just randomly views some video files on a computer showing clips of Aquaman, Cyborg, and the Flash, which is those character's introduction to the DCEU.

Other times, though, there's not enough going on. For about an hour in the middle of the film, there is very little action or dialogue. The plot comes to a bit of a stand still and takes time to breathe, but it takes too much time that the film starts to feel like background noise. The action does eventually ramp back up again, but not before a lot of tension is lost.

Speaking of action, that's the film's biggest strength and mostly saves it. The battle between Batman and Superman is good, and there is a great Batman-centric fight scene in a warehouse shortly after. However, I did think the final big battle of the film was weak and too CGI heavy. But visually, the film is generally great, which is another strength.

Overall, my review is a mess, just like Batman v Superman. My all-over-the-place comments are the only way I know how to review this all-over-the-place film, which has a number of great performances and scenes, but a weak sum of the parts. Thanks to its high production values and great fight scenes, Batman v Superman may be the best "bad" movie of all time. The film earned a whopping $873M at the box office (against a $300M budget), but received very mixed reviews, which ultimately had a ripple effect on the direction of the DCEU.
 

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,745
2,389
The Gunfighter (1950) - 7.5/10

Fairly gentle old western drama with little shooting/action and mostly just Gregory Peck talking/brooding. It's almost like an early post-Western if that's a thing. Has a bit of the mood of High Noon but without the suspenseful climax.

The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) - 7/10

Fanfare music non-stop and a lot of heads being thrown back with a hearty laugh. A nice little bit of sword duelling which was only chroreographed well in one scene towards the end. The rest however, especially the first half hour is a really well-paced adventure film that still holds up well.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
Bizarre viewing experience. Watched Jerzy Skolimoswski's Deep End, which I know has culty status and plenty of dedicated fans. While I appreciate a lot of what's going on stylistically and thematically, the lead performer is ADR'd to the point of distraction. His voice is weird and disembodied and never feels like it's actually coming from him — so much of his dialogue occurs when we're not looking at him speak. I'm struggling to think of the last time I've been so thoroughly annoyed by a technical aspect of a movie. It bothered me so much it completely undercuts what really is an otherwise interesting movie. I feel like I'm being nitpicky, but when he's doing 80% of the talking, it became nearly unbearable for me.

I don't know if I watched a version with a weird sound mix. I don't know if it's a style choice — it IS on a very dreamy vibe in general and the character himself is a little off. I don't know if it was just a practical need because the kid actually can't act and it was easier to dub him in after the fact.

I do know I hated the choice/use.

(remembered I slagged the bad CGI in The Mummy pretty hard recently as well ... so "not that long ago" is an answer to one of the questions I asked).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,772
3,808
A Bridge Too Far (1977) 2.5/5 stars

Chronicling Operation Market Garden the allied invasion of the Netherlands in order to create an invasion route into Germany.

From Sir Richard Attenborough staring a plethora of big names like Laurence Olivier, Gene Hackman, Sean Connery, Robert Redford, James Caan, Anthony Hopkins etc

There were some good scenes and good performances but overall a very choppy film. It kind of just goes from scene to scene from A lister to A lister. Was very long too.
Funny enough I just finished reading William Goldman's Adventures in the Screen Trade this weekend. He shares a ton of stories about his work over the years (up to the early 1980s at the point of publication) including A Bridge Too Far which he wrote the script for and cited as the best working he experience he ever had. He was very proud of the movie and surprised when it was received pretty indifferently in the U.S.

My feelings echoed yours as well. Kinda listless. I recall feeling like all the British actors were pretty good to great and every American (except Redford) felt miscast.
 

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,745
2,389
Spider-Man: Across The Spiderverse (2023) - 7/10

A visual achievement that makes those nice Japanese animes look like chumps but man was this tiring to watch. A bloated 2 hours 20 with action scenes which look cool but get repetitive and make you wish you could watch it at 0.75x with subtitles. I could understand what they were saying it's just that your brain has to do so much processing on each scene it's mentally draining. And tbh it's without a payoff because the ending is not like Avengers Infinity War which had a bit of a cliff-hanger but concluded the scene whereas this one had a literal cliff hanger mid-scene. I'm also not a fan of the constant poor dialogue heart-to-hearts they force down by slowing everything down all the way then picking it right up. It's almost like the film has a detachment but I bet stoners would love it. I really wanted to watch something more grounded after seeing this, too bad Past Lives only plays on Thursdays at the cinema here.

Freaks (1932) - 7/10

Bold early talky which is misclassified as a horror film. More of a nice succint drama though the slow-paced dialogue with somewhat amateur makes it feel longer than it is at times. It doesn't really overdo the actual freak angle and keeps it mostly story focused. Oh and there's no way the chick from the What We Do In The Shadows TV show did not take her accent from the the Russian woman in this film it's uncanny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Neil Racki

Registered User
May 2, 2018
5,314
5,765
Baltimore-ish
Infinity Pool (2023) sci fi horror - 7/10 .. its like White Lotus meets Midsommar. Mia Goth and Alexander Skarsgard. Good flick. Director says he has his own interpretation of the ending but doesnt want to say because art blah blah blah eye of beholder blah blah blah own conclusions. Brother .. your movie wasnt some deep thinking introspective shit. It was a good flick, maybe considered edgy or unique 20 years ago but now with streaming gets put in a long line of edgy indie sci fi horror genre.

Diabolique (1955) suspense/drama - 8.5/10 great acting, great writing, came into this w huge expectations and mostly met

Forgotten battle (2022) - 5/10 ... plot .. was there a plot? follow 3 separate people through the "story line", their personal "conflicts" were not very interesting .. this movie is the seinfeld of WWII movies .. its about nothing. threw it up on the big screen friday night .. what a dud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

Babe Ruth

Looks wise.. I'm a solid 8.5
Feb 2, 2016
1,595
697
The Comebacks (2007)

Sports movies basically get the Scary Movie treatment here.. not great, but it has some funny satire & roasts typical sport and movie underdog memes.
Some decent star power, and looked like it was produced by Adam Goldberg in his pre-Goldbergs career.
Currently on Hulu..
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzzyFan

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
guy-ritchies-the-covenant-I_05588_R_rgb.jpg


The Covenant (2023) Directed by Guy Ritchie 6A

John Kinley (Jake Gyllenhaal), a hard-nosed Army Sergeant, returns to Afghanistan on a rescue mission. HIs translator Ahmed (Dar Salim) went to great lengths to save Kinley's life, but now Ahmed is hung out to dry by the US government who reneged on a promise to provide Ahmed (and roughly 5000 other Afghan interpreters) with visas to the States when the war ended. With Ahmed now hunted by the Taliban, Kinley realizes that he will not rest unless he returns to Afghanistan to save his friend.

The Covenant is something of a departure for Guy Ritchie and his London gangster shtick. The movie is sort of a cross between The Killing Fields, minus the emotional power, and a toned-down Rambo movie. While written captions inform us of the betrayal of the Afghan interpreters, the movie itself is quite apolitical--a "let's go rescue the guy" vibe overwhelms any deeper sense of purpose. There is a lot of very good, well-directed action, maybe too much of it, as the explosions and gun battles sometimes obscure an interestingly terse performance by Gyllenhaal. I wanted the movie to get deeper into this guy, but there didn't seem enough time for that. Ultimately, The Covenant pulls off an odd trick--it criticizes the US for its moral duplicity in its treatment of its Afghan collaborators, but in a way that will not offend a single American.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,924
10,810
guy-ritchies-the-covenant-I_05588_R_rgb.jpg


The Covenant (2023) Directed by Guy Ritchie 6A

John Kinley (Jake Gyllenhaal), a hard-nosed Army Sergeant, returns to Afghanistan on a rescue mission. HIs translator Ahmed (Dar Salim) went to great lengths to save Kinley's life, but now Ahmed is hung out to dry by the US government who reneged on a promise to provide Ahmed (and roughly 5000 other Afghan interpreters) with visas to the States when the war ended. With Ahmed now hunted by the Taliban, Kinley realizes that he will not rest unless he returns to Afghanistan to save his friend.

The Covenant is something of a departure for Guy Ritchie and his London gangster shtick. The movie is sort of a cross between The Killing Fields, minus the emotional power, and a toned-down Rambo movie. While written captions inform us of the betrayal of the Afghan interpreters, the movie itself is quite apolitical--a "let's go rescue the guy" vibe overwhelms any deeper sense of purpose. There is a lot of very good, well-directed action, maybe too much of it, as the explosions and gun battles sometimes obscure an interestingly terse performance by Gyllenhaal. I wanted the movie to get deeper into this guy, but there didn't seem enough time for that. Ultimately, The Covenant pulls off an odd trick--it criticizes the US for its moral duplicity in its treatment of its Afghan collaborators, but in a way that will not offend a single American.
I'm a single American and loved it when I watched it last weekend. I started on a review, but keep putting off finishing it. Maybe I won't have to now that you've beaten me to the punch. As you said, it has a lot of action and is relatively apolitical, two things that I liked, along with the relationship between the men and the fact that it's a true story. It reminded me of Lone Survivor. I highly recommend it, which is surprising because I'm not a fan of Guy Ritchie's previous movies. I almost didn't watch it for that reason, but it's easily the least Guy Ritchie movie that he's ever made.
 
Last edited:

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,875
11,145
Toronto
I'm a single American and loved it when I watched it last weekend. I started on a review, but keep putting off finishing it. Maybe I won't have to now that you've beaten me to the punch. As you said, it has a lot of action and is relatively apolitical, two things that I liked, along with the relationship between the men and the fact that it's a true story. It reminded me of Lone Survivor. I highly recommend it, which is surprising because I'm not a fan of Guy Ritchie's previous movies. I almost didn't watch it for that reason, but it's easily the least Guy Ritchie movie that he's ever made.
There has been quite a lot of commentary pointing out that while the plight of Afghan interpreters is based on fact, the narrative in the film is not a true story. I don't think that makes much difference one way or another, but it is probably worth clarifying for accuracy's sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,924
10,810
There has been quite a lot of commentary pointing out that while the plight of Afghan interpreters is based on fact, the narrative in the film is not a true story. I don't think that makes much difference one way or another, but it is probably worth clarifying for accuracy's sake.
Oh. I figured that it was based on a true story because it was specific about the dates (like flashing "March 2018" at the beginning) and ended with real photos (which I guess were just representative, not actual people portrayed in the film). Thanks for the correction.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad