Speculation: - Larkin trade return | Page 84 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Larkin trade return

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Well - as I mentioned some time ago there is Barzal - however as some NYI fans pointed out to me they'd rather see picks/prospects to coincide with Schaeffer.

Barzal would be a safe return, but certainly not ideal if this team is set on obtaining youth instead...We'll see.

To me, I don't get the NYI one as Larkin has no connection to anyone there and they aren't doing well. The other teams on his list he at least has connections to and/or are contending with the exception of Utah, though not sure if Utah is for sure one of the teams on the list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FMichael
NYI?

Interesting...
Rumors are rampant about Larkin's expanded list. To my knowledge (which could be outdated), no one has disclosed, citing sources, the teams that were added. The Woodward guys, based on that video thumbnail, are all about the Flyers. Since when did they become a Larkin suitor?

Until I hear it from a reputable and reliable source, I don't believe it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FMichael
Florida doesn't have anything but Lundell though as a piece.
They have 9 overall this year. Again, not the first thing on my list, but it's an asset that could be used for another deal if a different team doesn't end up having a better trade package.

For example, I'd much sooner build a deal around Larkin+ in exchange for Lundell and 9 overall, versus the nonsense that Minnesota would likely offer. I'm not trading him for a goaltender and any skaters I would actually want are pieces they won't part with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winger98
I’m not f***ing talking shit about your precious scenery. Every state has those. All I know is that Cali is made for the rich. Not the normal human being. No normal person with a normal job can survive there and actually enjoy life to the fullest. Just like NY is f***ing absurdly expensive. It’s a facade.

we’ll agree to disagree and move on.

I also could care less about big cities or beaches. I’m not talking shit about the environment or how certain areas there are gorgeous. I’m sure they are. I’m not disputing the nature aspect: so please don’t twist my words.

But California is made for the rich. Fake influencers and corrupt businesses.

Go watch Peter Santenello. He travels and vlogs and his California videos which are an hour long on YT proves this.

People talk about California but they really mean LA, or San Francisco, or more accurately a fictional creation the media rants about to get viewers.

California has a population of 39 million people. That's almost as many as Canada. It's also the 3rd largest state by area, stretching from San Ysidro near Tijuana all the way up to the Redwood forest.

But if you want to generalize a state that size and that diverse based on a few YT vids then knock yourself out I guess.
 
Last edited:
They have 9 overall this year. Again, not the first thing on my list, but it's an asset that could be used for another deal if a different team doesn't end up having a better trade package.

For example, I'd much sooner build a deal around Larkin+ in exchange for Lundell and 9 overall, versus the nonsense that Minnesota would likely offer. I'm not trading him for a goaltender and any skaters I would actually want are pieces they won't part with.

Yeah, but is Fla willing to move Lundell and 9? I can't see it.
 
Anton Lundell is only worth 13 scrabble points while Dylan Larkin is worth 19 so Larkin is worth about one and a half times as much as Lundell is
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad