monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
Player Discussion - Lane Hutson Part 2 | Page 288 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

I didn't quite follow the thread. Are we talking about last game or all the games this season? I meant for the extra points that Hutson can get if we had better forwards this year.
I think it applies to all games, but I was using the last game as an example. While I'm sure he'd have more points if some of his set-ups had been converted, I don't think it's a simple as "Gally missed that easy goal, Hutson should have had 4 points!"
 
His NHL edge skating stats are insane considering his speed was always in question.

View attachment 957836

He's 95th percentile top speed and 96th for 20-22mph bursts (and 99th for 18-20mph).

For reference, those are similar numbers as Quinn Hughes this year (a bit better actually) and to his usual numbers. Hughes has a way better shot however, though he's improved it significantly every year since his draft year. It's still impressive to see that Hutson now has high end to elite speed.
It's because of those photoshopped quads, man.
 
Is Lane Hutson is a concession player?

The question is good. I posted a great article from La Presse..french.. about that earlier today
Depends if the concession sells hotdogs or other merch...

Sorry, couldn't help myself. Not picking on your english/french translation. Just seizing the opportunity to add levity to this board.

I'll see myself out now.
 
Honestly, I get what you're saying. He doesn't have the straight line speed to catch up with a fast forward that gets past him, I don't disagree with you on that. I believe that the speed bursts that put him so high in those metrics are when he accelerates down into the zone from the blueline and goes from a standing still head fake to top speed in about 2 strides. He might not have elite speed, but he does have elite quickness and acceleration, which he uses to gain an advantage on opponents.
Yeah, that would make sense.
 
I think it applies to all games, but I was using the last game as an example. While I'm sure he'd have more points if some of his set-ups had been converted, I don't think it's a simple as "Gally missed that easy goal, Hutson should have had 4 points!"
The coulda woulda shoulda game is an exercise in futility.
Suzuki shoulda been a PPG player last season but the law of averages happens.
I remember talking about our team and our PP in particular stating there are only so many goals to go around per unit.
When Laine joined we scored a few more but Caufield scored less. 1st line Caufield scoring up Suzuki scoring down.
Hutson's scoring will increase naturally as our line depth scoring improves.
 
If our forwards could capitalize better the chances that Hutson has created for them, Hutson could easily have an extra of 5 points.

I'd dare to say even 10.

For all of us that watched every game, he created at least 3-4 high scoring chances for the boys each game since day 1.

Imagine Anderson or Dvorak scoring on his plays since the beginning? Loll

Franchise player
Soon we'll have an other one up front. 😁
 
Markov had a better shot by a mile though, both wristers and slapshots.
Markov was also a rock on defense.
Hutson will go down as a much better dman when all is said and done. He’s going to be a superstar.

Markov had a better shot by a mile though, both wristers and slapshots.
Markov was also a rock on defense.
Hutson will go down as a much better dman when all is said and done. He’s going to be a superstar.
 
Still, if you truly believe in him you don’t risk losing him on a hunch. They got lucky.

I agree. If the Habs brass, or anyone around the NHL, would have thought he'd be *this* good, no chance you risk taking him late 2nd round.

They may have gambled correctly based on the size concerns but it was extremely lucky cause what a stud he is. Imagine him in 2-3 years, good lord.
 
They obviously knew what they were doing though. It’s easy now to sit here and second guess everyone else now that Hutson’s a star. But he was a 5’7 gamble. The Habs had to be thinking that he’d get passed over- which he did.
Still, if you truly believe in him you don’t risk losing him on a hunch. They got lucky.

The best Habs prospect of my lifetime. Kid is unreal. I was a huge Brian Leetch fan growing up. He does things even Leetch couldn’t do.
 
Still, if you truly believe in him you don’t risk losing him on a hunch. They got lucky.

The best Habs prospect of my lifetime. Kid is unreal. I was a huge Brian Leetch fan growing up. He does things even Leetch couldn’t do.
They did believe in him. They tried to trade up in the 2nd round to take him. They probably rightly calculated he wouldn't go in the first or early 2nd and didn't want to use the 1st pick in the 2nd round on him. They then were fortunate that he fell to the end of the 2nd when they couldn't move up.
 
They did believe in him. They tried to trade up in the 2nd round to take him. They probably rightly calculated he wouldn't go in the first or early 2nd and didn't want to use the 1st pick in the 2nd round on him. They then were fortunate that he fell to the end of the 2nd when they couldn't move up.
I hate this logic. Imagine if another team felt the same way and grabbed him at 56 or even 32. Gambling an elite talent like Lane so you can stack players like phil mesar. yay.

They lucked out that he was still available at 62.
 
They did believe in him. They tried to trade up in the 2nd round to take him. They probably rightly calculated he wouldn't go in the first or early 2nd and didn't want to use the 1st pick in the 2nd round on him. They then were fortunate that he fell to the end of the 2nd when they couldn't move up.
No, they didn’t let a superstar fall to 62 because they had super high faith in him. They got lucky, very lucky.
 
No, they didn’t let a superstar fall to 62 because they had super high faith in him. They got lucky, very lucky.
There’s some truth to this but at the end of the day players who stand 5’7 aren’t generally in demand. And there was no guarantee he was going to grow - notes from his endchronologist notwithstanding.

The closest us shlubs here ever get to a real draft is a fantasy hockey one. I’ve participated in many. I get that it’s just fantasy but the same rules apply.

I don’t draft players I think I can get later in the first round. It just doesn’t make sense to do that. Now - occasionally I get burned doing that. This year I missed out on Caufield with that strategy because I thought since he’d only scored 28 last year and would hang around a bit longer. Missed him by two picks. So sure, that could’ve happened to us here.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->