Estimated_Prophet
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2003
- 11,118
- 12,290
Quinn made his debut in his D1 season, he was already at Michigan during his draft year.
Quinn was 5'10 180 in his rookie season.
Quinn was 7th overall and honestly should have gone top 3 at the time, people using him to justify Lane is lazy they have very little in common.
Quinn played in the world's at 17 and wasn't on the ice for a goal against, for his size his defense was never in question. Quinn is a top 5 skater in the league which is paramount for smaller D.
Some of the takes here are nuts, look at it this way, Quinn, Fox, Makar, are all top 10 dmen and aren't big, they have set a precedent , so the fact that no team took lane in the 1st knowing size can be overcome to a point means teams either don't think his skill is enough to overcome the size, or they don't see a kid that weighs 155 pounds realistically getting to a better weight.
Spurgeon is who size wise he should expect to become.
Hockey is filled with kids like him who are held back by size and weight that play defense.
Hope I'm wrong but the NHL is much different than the NCAA.
You are overlooking the biggest difference between Lane and Makar/Q. Hughes/Fox. The other three were always elite skaters whereas skating is one of Hutson's most noticeable weaknesses. He has the puck skills and IQ of these three players but his development entirely hinges on making significant gains in strength and explosiveness/backskating.
I wouldn't bet against the kid but I would also be hesitant to bet on him as well. I know it is a boring take but we really do just have to wait and see. Those that are anointing him the next Cale Makar are just as ridiculous as those who are saying that he won't make it yet you can't entirely rule out either scenario.....I choose to enjoy the ride and am trying my best but failing to avoid interacting with the large contingent of hyperbolic/hot take agents that exist around here.