Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,118
12,290
Quinn made his debut in his D1 season, he was already at Michigan during his draft year.
Quinn was 5'10 180 in his rookie season.
Quinn was 7th overall and honestly should have gone top 3 at the time, people using him to justify Lane is lazy they have very little in common.
Quinn played in the world's at 17 and wasn't on the ice for a goal against, for his size his defense was never in question. Quinn is a top 5 skater in the league which is paramount for smaller D.
Some of the takes here are nuts, look at it this way, Quinn, Fox, Makar, are all top 10 dmen and aren't big, they have set a precedent , so the fact that no team took lane in the 1st knowing size can be overcome to a point means teams either don't think his skill is enough to overcome the size, or they don't see a kid that weighs 155 pounds realistically getting to a better weight.

Spurgeon is who size wise he should expect to become.
Hockey is filled with kids like him who are held back by size and weight that play defense.
Hope I'm wrong but the NHL is much different than the NCAA.

You are overlooking the biggest difference between Lane and Makar/Q. Hughes/Fox. The other three were always elite skaters whereas skating is one of Hutson's most noticeable weaknesses. He has the puck skills and IQ of these three players but his development entirely hinges on making significant gains in strength and explosiveness/backskating.

I wouldn't bet against the kid but I would also be hesitant to bet on him as well. I know it is a boring take but we really do just have to wait and see. Those that are anointing him the next Cale Makar are just as ridiculous as those who are saying that he won't make it yet you can't entirely rule out either scenario.....I choose to enjoy the ride and am trying my best but failing to avoid interacting with the large contingent of hyperbolic/hot take agents that exist around here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicehiss

Matthew McConaughay

Registered User
May 3, 2013
3,073
4,303
I don't see where you guys see Hutson is not a good skater, he's a great skater, he might not be the fastest, but he can change directions on a dime, i have never seen a skater so agile and deceiving, he's more agile on his skates than Fox, Hughes or Makar, being a great skater is not only being fast.
 
Last edited:

McGuires Corndog

Pierre's favorite MONSTER performer
Sponsor
Feb 6, 2008
26,540
14,752
Montreal
I don't where you guys see Hutson is not a good skater, he's a great skater, he might not be the fastest, but he can change directions on a dime, i have never seen a skater so agile and deceiving, he's more agile on his skates than Fox, Hughes or Makar, being a great skater is not only being fast.
He’s just not explosive, for some reason people equate that to bad skating.

His explosiveness will improve with added strength to his lower body with more physical maturity and training. It’s almost the exact same thing people used to pin against Caufield and it’s now a strength in his game rather than a weakness.
 

Favster

Registered User
Jul 21, 2013
2,405
2,903
Montreal
He’s just not explosive, for some reason people equate that to bad skating.

His explosiveness will improve with added strength to his lower body with more physical maturity and training. It’s almost the exact same thing people used to pin against Caufield and it’s now a strength in his game rather than a weakness.
He also has technical flaws in his skating, he really needs to calm his upper body movement while hustling but yeah, his explosiveness should improve with added strength.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
8,846
11,461
I don't where you guys see Hutson is not a good skater, he's a great skater, he might not be the fastest, but he can change directions on a dime, i have never seen a skater so agile and deceiving, he's more agile on his skates than Fox, Hughes or Makar, being a great skater is not only being fast.
He has great mobility, but his skating backward needs improvement, his first steps aren't explosive enough and his straight line speed isn't that amazing (also a weird stance when trying to skate super fast in a straight line).

The question is always "can he improves it" and the answer is usually "we will see in two years".
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
He has great mobility, but his skating backward needs improvement, his first steps aren't explosive enough and his straight line speed isn't that amazing (also a weird stance when trying to skate super fast in a straight line).

The question is always "can he improves it" and the answer is usually "we will see in two years".

Agreed. What we see today is one darn good young player improving and performing. But make no mistake, if he turns into what we think he can, he has improvements to make in many areas.

I'd like to see him work on his shot. More muscle helps in many areas.... including his ability to deal with big/fast NHL players and also a better shot so he is a dual threat with shot/pass.
 

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,527
23,161
Edmonton
Ummm....no.

5'10" 165 lbs is scrawny for a hockey player, that is just an easily verified fact.
510 165 (legit)is on the smaller size for hockey players but at that size, you would look like a normal, fit adult. I certainly wouldn't turn away a prospective son in law for being that size....

Turris, Kane, Hopkins were all smaller than that in their early days.
 

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
78,792
129,248
Montreal
Wow, 165-170lbs on a 5'10" frame is.......

Weedy.

If my eldest daughter brought someone like that home, I'd look to find ways to suggest she looks for a real man, not a boy. Unless that weedy boy is the next Cale Makar / Adam Fox, of course.

What you expect as a son-in-law:

1677161017600.png


What you'll most likely end up with as a son-in-law:

1677161156447.png



:laugh:
 
Last edited:

MonkeyBusiness

Registered User
Mar 3, 2013
4,337
1,058
You are overlooking the biggest difference between Lane and Makar/Q. Hughes/Fox. The other three were always elite skaters whereas skating is one of Hutson's most noticeable weaknesses. He has the puck skills and IQ of these three players but his development entirely hinges on making significant gains in strength and explosiveness/backskating.

I wouldn't bet against the kid but I would also be hesitant to bet on him as well. I know it is a boring take but we really do just have to wait and see. Those that are anointing him the next Cale Makar are just as ridiculous as those who are saying that he won't make it yet you can't entirely rule out either scenario.....I choose to enjoy the ride and am trying my best but failing to avoid interacting with the large contingent of hyperbolic/hot take agents that exist around here.
Fox might be elite with his change of directions, lateral skating, and he can be very deceptive in how he angles his body to create space, but he's far from an elite skater in terms of top-end speed and acceleration. If anything there are similarities in Hutson's skating with that of Fox.
 
Last edited:

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,498
16,208
He also has technical flaws in his skating, he really needs to calm his upper body movement while hustling but yeah, his explosiveness should improve with added strength.
He does the upper body movement less than he was at the start of the season.

And he also looks faster.

Still has to improve but i see differences from the start of the season.
 

durojean

Registered User
May 29, 2007
2,372
1,340
Quinn made his debut in his D1 season, he was already at Michigan during his draft year.
Quinn was 5'10 180 in his rookie season.
Quinn was 7th overall and honestly should have gone top 3 at the time, people using him to justify Lane is lazy they have very little in common.
Quinn played in the world's at 17 and wasn't on the ice for a goal against, for his size his defense was never in question. Quinn is a top 5 skater in the league which is paramount for smaller D.
Some of the takes here are nuts, look at it this way, Quinn, Fox, Makar, are all top 10 dmen and aren't big, they have set a precedent , so the fact that no team took lane in the 1st knowing size can be overcome to a point means teams either don't think his skill is enough to overcome the size, or they don't see a kid that weighs 155 pounds realistically getting to a better weight.

Spurgeon is who size wise he should expect to become.
Hockey is filled with kids like him who are held back by size and weight that play defense.
Hope I'm wrong but the NHL is much different than the NCAA.

The reason why Lane Hutson was not drafted in the first round is actually the same reason why Slafkovsky went 1st overall.

NHL scout are putting too much emphasis on size.

Big players have a plus value even if they are not there with skills/iq

Small players get a minus value even if they are superior to the average in term of skils and iq.

Also same reason why Caufield went 15 overall after breaking nearly all the records in goal scoring in his league.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,832
44,454
www.youtube.com
He also has technical flaws in his skating, he really needs to calm his upper body movement while hustling but yeah, his explosiveness should improve with added strength.

He has great mobility, but his skating backward needs improvement, his first steps aren't explosive enough and his straight line speed isn't that amazing (also a weird stance when trying to skate super fast in a straight line).

The question is always "can he improves it" and the answer is usually "we will see in two years".


well said by both posters, you nailed it! :clap::cheers:
 

Cournoyer12

Registered User
Mar 17, 2022
1,507
2,138
Agreed. What we see today is one darn good young player improving and performing. But make no mistake, if he turns into what we think he can, he has improvements to make in many areas.

I'd like to see him work on his shot. More muscle helps in many areas.... including his ability to deal with big/fast NHL players and also a better shot so he is a dual threat with shot/pass.
Milk, Anavar, and Olympic lifts! That should do it 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Halifax

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad