Slow down there guy, just because I am bringing up at the moment that Hutson's competition appears to be weaker than who he is being compared to most frequently, doesn't mean I'm trying to discredit what Hutson has done.It means that he is showing with some visuals how Lane is not getting as tough matchups as Makar and Hughes were getting on their rookie seasons. Basically he is saying that the stats of Lane are not directly comparable to Makar's and Hughes' rookie seasons, as those two faced more of the "best players" than what Lane is facing.
Its in a way a clouding some of the success of Lane with a "ye he is good but it might be just the weakness of his opponents". At the same time the poster is suggesting to rush the development of Lane. Throw him to the wolves is his message. And he hopes the wolves will finish Lane off. Believe me, these are no pet wolves that the poster is suggesting Lane to meet.
Sure "you shut down the best players with your best players", he is not wrong in a sense, but imo it would be idiotic to put Lane in that spot and position at this point.
Let me know if you need more translations of such posts. I know those posts all too well.
Makar and Hughes have the full season to go off of, Hutson is only half way through. Makar and Hughes could have had a similar looking chart half way through their season. I genuinely wish to see if Hutson can maintain the success, while increase his workload against the best players in the league, which would befit a star.
Cause quite frankly, I don't view a player as a star unless they are doing this against the best of the best, therefore for him truly get into that star category (for me), he would need to maintain the success against better players.
My profile pic may designate my fandom, and thus the a perceived bias for a player that is brought up, but don't get it twisted. I think Hutson is a phenomenal player, and I am excited to see how the next few years play out for him.