Don Tami
Aurinkokuningas, Kiekkoleijona #79
- Feb 28, 2017
- 380
- 178
Man, that ****ty Laine Photoshop I did was reposted on reddit, and the stars forum
Couldn't resist posting it on their GTD, though apparently they loved it too
Man, that ****ty Laine Photoshop I did was reposted on reddit, and the stars forum
Scheifele 23min TOI. Why? Looked weak and rusty. Let him get in shape with lower minutes and put those guys on the ice who can do the magic.
When Kessel was traded to Pitt he was not an upcoming UFA though. He was on the same contract he is on now...64m for 8 years. Pitt didn't sign him. There are 4 more years after this one still on the deal._______________________________________________________
If the Jet's win the Stanley Cup, and Statsny was a big part of that-- there is a good chance the Jet's will resign him. It reminds me of when Phil Kessel went to the Penns from Toronto, and the Penns won the Cup-- "they then signed Kessel-long term".
So, I would not at all count this possibility out-- it all depends on what happens.
Maurice said he would look at sitting some players around the Sens/Habs b2b.It's not gonna change at this point. I am just hoping that the coaching staff knows what they are doing. I don't think we will have the freshest vets come playoffs. Their play has seen a gradual decline as the season has gone on. They were unstoppable in the beginning of the season.
______________________________________________________When Kessel was traded to Pitt he was not an upcoming UFA though. He was on the same contract he is on now...64m for 8 years. Pitt didn't sign him. There are 4 more years after this one still on the deal.
Leafs are paying 1.2m a year of that contract.
Makes me wonder how good 55's overall game is that PMo would ride him that much. He did look rusty to my eye test but apparently not to coach.Scheifele 23min TOI. Why? Looked weak and rusty. Let him get in shape with lower minutes and put those guys on the ice who can do the magic.
Maurice said he would look at sitting some players around the Sens/Habs b2b.
If I'm coach and 2nd is secured, anyone with injuries would rest.
I think the backup gets the Ducks game and Chicago and the Habs. I'd give him more if we have 2nd.
It's all about matchups, I think. PoMo wanted the first line with Wheeler to go against Dallas top line with Benn. Therefore if Wheeler plays, Scheifele plays.
I would put money on the fact that he asked for that much time to get himself in playing shape.Solid game. Team definitely looks better without half the guys injured.
Helle and Laine doing Helle and Laine things. Stas line was great, but everyone was at least decent. Lehtonen and Bishop made some big saves too.
I don't have much of an issue with it. If teams key on CSW, EStL will rip them a new one. If they're able to key on both lines, then PCL/PLR gets less coverage.
Isn't it nice to be able to check the various playoff prediction math models and see us with a big fat 100%-less-a-Snickers-bar chance of making the playoffs and a double-digit chance to win the cup?
Instead of, you know, trying to imagine if we can squeeze out an 8-2 run to give us a 20% chance to sneak in if the stars align.
Couldn't resist posting it on their GTD, though apparently they loved it too
Really nice. And weird. Nice and weird.
______________________________________________________
Well Pitt didn't sign him, but they took over his contract, which is really the same thing as signing him. Pitt is paying him about $ 8- 1.2 m= $ 6.8 mil per season. So Pitt didn't sign him, but it's really the same thing as signing him, because Pitt is obligated for another 4 more years, at $ 6.8 mil per season.
Reason why Pitt did this, is Kessel fit so well into their lineup, and was scoring a lot of goals. I'm saying this could happen with Paul Statsny as well ?? I guess we''l see.
_________________________________________________________As I understand it, it is not the same thing at all. Kessel was under contract to Pitt after the trade. He couldn't go sign or play elsewhere. Stastny gets to choose where he signs and plays.
That is one aspect of it, but if we are playing a home game, should it not be us dictating how we want to play the game? Why don't we play our guys that are scoring non-stop and let the opposition match-up against that?
But we did dictate the game and matchups - Scheif / Wheels / Connor vs. Benn / Seguin / Radulov. That was their primary matchup, and they did well in shutting them down, leaving EStL to matchup against the Faksa line. This dictated most of the TOI differences.
I'm not saying the result in this game was not good. I am saying that we have a similar top-heavy trend in TOI distribution, no matter what happens on the ice. Even Maurice is constantly talking about "increasing minutes" so we know what mindset he has.
The performance on the ice is not reflecting a desirable TOI distribution in my opinion. The average shift lenght seems off. Shouldn't we start laying off Wheeler (23:08 in this game) before the playoffs for example?
Would you have matched EStL up against Benn, Seguin, and Radulov? If not, then there's your TOI distribution explanation.