brock0791
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2015
- 849
- 333
it won't take ten games
No one's saying it would but you can't give magic numbers based on what you think it'll take they're based on math
it won't take ten games
To me, it's a bit like San Jose and Ottawa (and formerly Wpg). When your top D are suspect defensively it's so hard to win the big games.I take a bit of an extra liking to beating Dallas. I remember a time on these boards when Jim Nil was lauded as some kind of genius and Chevy was a simpleton in comparison. I saw back then and still see a very flawed Stars team. Their forward depth is non existent, their defense outside a good 1st pairing is either old or not NHL quality. Bishop is always hurt and he is signed long term down there(fyi people here wanted Bishop badly). They have little prospect depth beyond Heiskeinen and Tufte. Next off season you are going to see a team have to try and free agent its way into the playoffs next season because there window to be top notch is getting smaller and smaller.
I don't have much of an issue with it. If teams key on CSW, EStL will rip them a new one. If they're able to key on both lines, then PCL/PLR gets less coverage.
No one's saying it would but you can't give magic numbers based on what you think it'll take they're based on math
Yes, if a team like that really only has one great line and they are desperate, they are going to run them into the ground. Then we end up doing the same thing. Right or wrong, that's how it goes.Yeah. This plus the fact that they have an elite top line that was playing at its best. Sometimes a win is when your top line cancels out theirs. I thought that out top line matched theirs.
Yes it's possible for one team to overtake the Jets but not 2 or 3 teams.
The Kings play Wild, Jets and Avs in the next 4 days and if they don't beat the Av's they need to win against the Wild and Jets or they are in seriously trouble.
Why not lowry Some more? He only played 10,30...Would you have matched EStL up against Benn, Seguin, and Radulov? If not, then there's your TOI distribution explanation.
Man that was a very SLICK redirect passHats off to Ehlers brilliant Dummy play on Pate’s second goal. Shades of Mario’s epic between the legs feint play on the Olympic game winning goal for Canada.
Ummmh.......I'm the one doing the magic number thread. It's all about math. I've been doing the math for a few weeks. It has nothing to do with what I think.
Minimum number of points needed to clinch = 8
Points per win =2
Wins needed to clinch = 4
Games remaining = 10
Therefore record needed = 4-6 (3-5-2)
Of course for every game St. Louis loses the record we need changes
we could also clinch with
3 wins and 2OTL
2 wins and 4 OTL
1 wins and 6 OTL
0 wins and 8 OTL
It is also possible to clinch going 0-10-0 because points lost by the other team also reduce the magic number. 4-6 is not necessarily needed as you claim. There are many other scenarios in play.
This is the reason the magic number thread uses points instead of wins. I have no idea why you think you need to explain this to me.
Because you're using semantics. It was just a quick post in a post game thread. I and everyone else obviously grasp that 4-6 is the same as 3-5-2 or 2-6-4
I've also now stated twice that this is the record we need under the absolute worst case scenario of controlling our own fate
If that was the by-product of playing the Stas line more, then sure.
Maybe it's not correct, but it sure as hell seems correct.
I didn't realize how good our GA looks... we're like 5th or something? I knew we could score but that is going to serve us well in the playoffs.I'm so unused to numbers like that, it looks like someone broke something on the NHL.com website.
On the Dallas Stars Wiki this morning
Laine scored all 4? Wut?Can anyone other than Laine score? Everyone had so many opportunities and got zip to show for it.
Laine scored all 4? Wut?
Wheeler just passes the puck into the net