There is no luck. It's variance.
If you're into magical thinking, I'm sure your analysis sounds legit. If I used the same "logic", I could argue that Laine has used up all his bad luck and it's going to be all smooth sailing from here on out because the odds are in his favor so much. Clearly faulty logic, but doesn't stop you does it?
It's just based on your baseless feeling that Laine is not fit, and that lack of fitness is causing concussions and bone breaks or whatever. It's ridiculous on it's face but I do realize that a lot of people think this is proper logic.
"Eric Lindros was just bad at hockey and not physically fit". Sound about right?
The guy who has the most consecutive games in NHL history must be the most fit athlete of them all by this logic. Behold.