- Dec 31, 2017
- 3,047
- 3,475
Glad they didn't have to start the season with him. Didn't want someone that didn't want to be here taking ice time from someone that does. Shame he was almost worthless.
There wouldn't have been space for him before, but we kind of dumped most of our spare blueliners over the offseason so I guess he fits now. Here's hoping it works out.Mtl fan coming in peace. Harris is a jack of all trade master of none dman. A good 3rd pairing dman atm (albeit a bit vanilla) and still young enough to maybe grow into a more solid two way 4th dman but probably unlikely. But with Guhle, Hutson, Xhekaj, Struble, Engstrom as kids/prospects on the left side there was simply no place for Harris moving forward.
an elvis buyout next year still isn't that bad imo but trading him at 50% seems a lot more feasible now that they're not going to be using a spot on laine (assuming the plan was always to use one on provorov)No retention is big, especially if you have an Elvis buyout in your mind, Gives them a lot of room to do something if they want to. 18 million under the cap now.
imo mateychuk will pretty easily be able to leap-frog harris at some point, even this year if he has a strong camp (and last year he had a really strong camp)So Harris is the 3LD this year and potential 2LD next year while Mateychuk learns and gets his feet wet. The door for Mateychuk is pretty closed, and the door for Christiansen is shut.
You didn’t like his hire anywayI don't believe we retained. If we retained AND gave up the 2nd I'm calling for Waddell to be fired.
Retention only matters to the owner, we're not near the cap and we're not going to use the money on anyone else this season. Wads would have had a lot better options if we could have retained half Laine's cap hit.Tied them for what? We had a winger who missed most of last season dealing with mental health and an 8 million + cap hit. I consider it a win to get away from him with no retention.
Just cut the cord and start fresh.
I at least try to not let that affect my impressions after the fact. I will also note that his signings, so far, have been pretty good.You didn’t like his hire anyway
Our owner clearly tied Wads hands.
That’s fairI at least try to not let that affect my impressions after the fact. I will also note that his signings, so far, have been pretty good.
I wouldn't characterize Harris as a "no name defenseman". If we still had, say, Bean on the roster I would be more annoyed. He's young depth of the type we kind of freely gave away earlier.Let that sink in
We just traded a 26 year old forward who was a PPG player for us 2 seasons out of 4 for a no name defensemen AND we added a 2nd round pick
No salary retention!!
Harris isn’t bad!
Laine contract is only for 2 more years and we already had a lot of cap. Harris will likely be another Bean / Boqvist kinda guy. This is horrible for Columbus, let’s be real hereSucks it didn't work in Columbus. Montreal gets a 2nd and high risk for a serviceable defenseman that can be used in Columbus to allow the young players to develop. Moving the salary in full is very big as others have noted. Opens some doors. Let's see what the system with Evason looks like and how the current players adjust, then decide what's next.
It’s almost like there’s an incredible amount of variables you’re not includingLet that sink in
We just traded a 26 year old forward who was a PPG player for us 2 seasons out of 4 for a no name defensemen AND we added a 2nd round pick