Speculation: LA Kings Offseason Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,359
20,461
I can’t believe that they’re willing to trade Vilardi but not trade byfield who hasn’t done jack shit since being in the NHL. How the hell could they value that guy over Vilardi
 

Martyros

Allow me to retort
Aug 13, 2005
7,801
1,163
Holly Hood
I don't care about losing Kupari. I care about losing Vilardi. It's not like we're trading Schenn for Richards. We're trading someone that finally established himself as a very good scoring option in the top 6 with even more room to grow.....for someone that has asked to leave 2 different organizations in a very young career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHOneedsSOX

kingskring

Registered User
Dec 3, 2012
3,621
1,907
I can’t believe that they’re willing to trade Vilardi but not trade byfield who hasn’t done jack shit since being in the NHL. How the hell could they value that guy over Vilardi
byfield was a rookie this year... you are quit impatient man. Lets see how he prefroms after recovering from Covid
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,359
20,461
byfield was a rookie this year... you are quit impatient man. Lets see how he prefroms after recovering from Covid
Why even take the chance when Vilardi is oozing with potential and is by far the most skilled. What a terrible take.
 

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,897
17,722
FsMD0iyWYAMpcti


FzocyDBWwAM-hxM
 

kingskring

Registered User
Dec 3, 2012
3,621
1,907
Why even take the chance when Vilardi is oozing with potential and is by far the most skilled. What a terrible take.
I bet you if I look at a bunch of old threads prior to this year, I could find at least 50+ posts from people who wanted the Kings to ship off Vilardi for anything they can get
 

Brownie to Pancakes

Registered User
Jul 1, 2012
1,224
1,461
CA
Gabe could blossom into a star or he could be perennially injured/have his shooting % come down to earth/play too much hardball in contract talks. I don't like this move but I see the logic
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigBrown

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,359
20,461
I bet you if I look at a bunch of old threads prior to this year, I could find at least 50+ posts from people who wanted the Kings to ship off Vilardi for anything they can get
There’s never been one guy on here who’s doubted vilardis skill. His issue was footspeed but that got fixed. There’s not one person on the kings fan board who think Byfield is more talented than Vilardi.

What a joke this f***ing blows man
 
Jun 30, 2006
5,632
2,520
And he also hasn't done anything significant that suggests he'll be anything more than a bottom 6 plug. Stoll was much better at what he did.
Stoll came up in a good organization, battled for pucks, win face offs etc. Did all the little things very well. With Kupari, he’s 23 and figuring it out. He’s developing a similar game, where he also does all the little things well, he wins face offs, checks etc.
 

BigBrown

Fly at eleven.
Feb 2, 2010
6,000
1,631
Sweden
I really like Vilardi so losing him sucks. Iafallo is gonna be missed but having him and Moore on the same team is redundant. Kupari hasn't shown anything that I'm gonna miss so whatever.

I hope we at least get a good role player to go along with PLD, a physical penalty killer would be ideal. We can't repeat the same PK disaster another playoff series.
 

bland

Registered User
Jul 1, 2004
7,881
12,041
I'm not saying he was better or worse than any of them. In fact, I'm agreeing. I'm saying that playing him on the 4th line and not giving him the chance to do what he was literally brought in to do is a stupid decision and a waste of cap space, a waste of a roster spot, and a waste of an asset.
I agree, just that HE wasted the chance and the team had no choice but to take him out of those situations.

That's how you know how bad our media is here, a "star" is brought in then nobody at all questioned why he was dropped almost immediately, taken out of practices, left home on roadies, then bought out.

Kovalchuk wanted no part of playing team hockey. He wanted to be fed for easy goals, but kept bleeding short-handed chances at the point and put in zero effort defensively. He was a problematic distraction who was never going to fit in, and Blake should have known that. But he wanted a "star", and as usual, changed the plan to fit in the names instead of putting in the effort to get the right player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad