deaderhead28
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 5,426
- 3,995
19:18 minute mark for LA Kings news.
Last edited:
Slides only apply to 18 and 19 year olds, last time I checked.Fagemo just hit 9 games, he may be down in Ontario for the rest of the year executing an ELC slide for Blake.
This is how Blake is going to continue to keep salaries down and hold almost all these guys at low salaries.
Unless the team gets in a pinch performance or injury wise, keeping these guys under 9 games up with the Kings.
The boys are coming up off injury and I would call up Lias as the next one anyway.
Other guys to hold down for elc slide/lower salaries with 9 games or less with Kings"
Bjornfotte
Spence
Moverare
Grans
An LHD acquisition would help to keep these guys down.
You could even give Allard and Bison a couple games if needed, unless they are on 1 ways.
Also, forwards:
Fagemo
Turcotte
all ELC slide eligible forwards except QB and Kupari.
Even using Lias and Tynan if required.
Slides only apply to 18 and 19 year olds, last time I checked
I'll get some coffeee...Slides only apply to 18 and 19 year olds, last time I checked.
19:18 minute mark for LA Kings news.
Can you please provide full list?Subscription required, obviously, but interesting reading for those with access.
2023 NHL prospect pool rankings: No. 7 Los Angeles Kings
This is one of the league's better groups thanks to two high-end prospects and good depth at forward and on defense.theathletic.com
For those without access, some data points from Scott Wheeler:
--Clarke and Byfield at 1 & 2. He seems high on both.
--He likes Spence a lot (#3)
--I was stoked (and surprised) to see Laferriere at 5 and Pinelli at 7, but I don't follow prospects as closely as I should.
--Bjornfot at 11. He seems mildly skeptical of his future compared to his potential. Toby's the only LHD on the list.
--Zero goalies on the list.
I mean we barely even have goalies in the system. Outside of Quick, Copley, and Petersen, we have Matt Villalta, Jacob Ingham, and David Hrenak, Ingham has been out all year. We own the rights to Juho Markkanen and Lukas Parik too.Subscription required, obviously, but interesting reading for those with access.
2023 NHL prospect pool rankings: No. 7 Los Angeles Kings
This is one of the league's better groups thanks to two high-end prospects and good depth at forward and on defense.theathletic.com
For those without access, some data points from Scott Wheeler:
--Clarke and Byfield at 1 & 2. He seems high on both.
--He likes Spence a lot (#3)
--I was stoked (and surprised) to see Laferriere at 5 and Pinelli at 7, but I don't follow prospects as closely as I should.
--Bjornfot at 11. He seems mildly skeptical of his future compared to his potential. Toby's the only LHD on the list.
--Zero goalies on the list.
Bjornfots ELC kicked in already, you can’t slide years once it begins, Spence also.Fagemo just hit 9 games, he may be down in Ontario for the rest of the year executing an ELC slide for Blake.
This is how Blake is going to continue to keep salaries down and hold almost all these guys at low salaries.
Unless the team gets in a pinch performance or injury wise, keeping these guys under 9 games up with the Kings.
The boys are coming up off injury and I would call up Lias as the next one, if needed, anyway.
Other guys to hold down for elc slide/lower salaries with 9 games or less with Kings"
Bjornfotte
Spence
Moverare
Grans
An LHD acquisition would help to keep these guys down.
You could even give Allard and Bison a couple games if needed, unless they are on 1 ways.
Also, forwards:
Fagemo
Turcotte
all ELC slide eligible forwards except QB and Kupari.
Even using Lias and Tynan if required.
Laferriere really doesn’t surprise me, I’ve followed him a little. I think he becomes a regular at some stage making some vets moveable to clear cap. Pinelli also but I fear he’s a name teams with covet in trades.Subscription required, obviously, but interesting reading for those with access.
2023 NHL prospect pool rankings: No. 7 Los Angeles Kings
This is one of the league's better groups thanks to two high-end prospects and good depth at forward and on defense.theathletic.com
For those without access, some data points from Scott Wheeler:
--Clarke and Byfield at 1 & 2. He seems high on both.
--He likes Spence a lot (#3)
--I was stoked (and surprised) to see Laferriere at 5 and Pinelli at 7, but I don't follow prospects as closely as I should.
--Bjornfot at 11. He seems mildly skeptical of his future compared to his potential. Toby's the only LHD on the list.
--Zero goalies on the list.
In order, 1-15, with the tiers (Wheeler's term) spaced out:Can you please provide full list?
Thank you
Most people have no clue who he is. Same thing happened to Palffy.How the hell is fiala not involved in the skills comp? Guy can flat out skate and snipe ..
Just read the article. Really wish I was wrong back when everyone was fellating Blake about his #1 prospect pool but common sense is still undefeated when going up against the projected lineup in four years comprised of every prospect.Subscription required, obviously, but interesting reading for those with access.
2023 NHL prospect pool rankings: No. 7 Los Angeles Kings
This is one of the league's better groups thanks to two high-end prospects and good depth at forward and on defense.theathletic.com
For those without access, some data points from Scott Wheeler:
--Clarke and Byfield at 1 & 2. He seems high on both.
--He likes Spence a lot (#3)
--I was stoked (and surprised) to see Laferriere at 5 and Pinelli at 7, but I don't follow prospects as closely as I should.
--Bjornfot at 11. He seems mildly skeptical of his future compared to his potential. Toby's the only LHD on the list.
--Zero goalies on the list.
Just read the article. Really wish I was wrong back when everyone was fellating Blake about his #1 prospect pool but common sense is still undefeated when going up against the projected lineup in four years comprised of every prospect.
Wheeler tosses Madden aside like he is nothing but this kid was a Top 5 prospect in the Kings top ranked pool a few years ago. Fagemo was in the Top 5 after the WJC...now he is #9 and it isn't because there is a murderers row in front of him.
How is that 2019 first round looking at the moment? Kupari?
Can we finally get in agreement that it was wrong to act like Blake was the best f***ing GM to ever GM because he traded away real NHL players for picks/prospects and lost on purpose for more high picks? If you don't have a Top 5 rated pool immediately following those drafts, that means you just went way off the board on your picks. You could just go with CSB's rankings with all of your picks from 2017 - '19 and add in the prospects obtained in trades and you'll be ranked Top 5. Now, I agreed with this strategy but the adoration for what he "accomplished" once the pool was rated highly was very GWB on an aircraft carrier.
Did he draft the right guys and will they develop them correctly? That's the real test.
Upper Deck NHL Fastest Skater™How the hell is fiala not involved in the skills comp? Guy can flat out skate and snipe ..
Subscription required, obviously, but interesting reading for those with access.
2023 NHL prospect pool rankings: No. 7 Los Angeles Kings
This is one of the league's better groups thanks to two high-end prospects and good depth at forward and on defense.theathletic.com
For those without access, some data points from Scott Wheeler:
--Clarke and Byfield at 1 & 2. He seems high on both.
--He likes Spence a lot (#3)
--I was stoked (and surprised) to see Laferriere at 5 and Pinelli at 7, but I don't follow prospects as closely as I should.
--Bjornfot at 11. He seems mildly skeptical of his future compared to his potential. Toby's the only LHD on the list.
--Zero goalies on the list.
Don’t see itUpper Deck NHL Fastest Skater™
Participants
Kevin Fiala, LAK
Dylan Larkin, DET
Kirill Kaprizov, MIN
Cale Makar, COL
Chandler Stephenson, VGK
Andrei Svechnikov, CAR
I mean LA was top 5 last year on this list, and I think top 2 prior. Guys graduate, other teams added first round picks.. I think it is a fair rankingJust read the article. Really wish I was wrong back when everyone was fellating Blake about his #1 prospect pool but common sense is still undefeated when going up against the projected lineup in four years comprised of every prospect.
Wheeler tosses Madden aside like he is nothing but this kid was a Top 5 prospect in the Kings top ranked pool a few years ago. Fagemo was in the Top 5 after the WJC...now he is #9 and it isn't because there is a murderers row in front of him.
How is that 2019 first round looking at the moment? Kupari?
Can we finally get in agreement that it was wrong to act like Blake was the best f***ing GM to ever GM because he traded away real NHL players for picks/prospects and lost on purpose for more high picks? If you don't have a Top 5 rated pool immediately following those drafts, that means you just went way off the board on your picks. You could just go with CSB's rankings with all of your picks from 2017 - '19 and add in the prospects obtained in trades and you'll be ranked Top 5. Now, I agreed with this strategy but the adoration for what he "accomplished" once the pool was rated highly was very GWB on an aircraft carrier.
Did he draft the right guys and will they develop them correctly? That's the real test.
Don’t see it
The argument is that this hack's list is a huge reason why everyone was gushing over Blake. Kaliyev is the only one that Wheeler ever ranked highly.Dude, Anderson and Kaliyev have already solidified themselves as NHLers and Blake traded away a kid who would have been #2 or 3 on this hacks list.
Not sure what your argument is here.
Subscription required, obviously, but interesting reading for those with access.
2023 NHL prospect pool rankings: No. 7 Los Angeles Kings
This is one of the league's better groups thanks to two high-end prospects and good depth at forward and on defense.theathletic.com
For those without access, some data points from Scott Wheeler:
--Clarke and Byfield at 1 & 2. He seems high on both.
--He likes Spence a lot (#3)
--I was stoked (and surprised) to see Laferriere at 5 and Pinelli at 7, but I don't follow prospects as closely as I should.
--Bjornfot at 11. He seems mildly skeptical of his future compared to his potential. Toby's the only LHD on the list.
--Zero goalies on the list.
This was a really good write up.
I love what he says in the Clark being different and having some quirks not necessarily being a bad thing. I think far to often that scouts, fans etc amplify negatives while not talking enough about extraordinary skills or traits players have. I bet a lot of these decision makers played with a team full of the average guys in NHL Ice Hockey when they were kids. When you needed some of the stuff the fat guys and skinny guys brought to the team.
Just read the article. Really wish I was wrong back when everyone was fellating Blake about his #1 prospect pool but common sense is still undefeated when going up against the projected lineup in four years comprised of every prospect.
Wheeler tosses Madden aside like he is nothing but this kid was a Top 5 prospect in the Kings top ranked pool a few years ago. Fagemo was in the Top 5 after the WJC...now he is #9 and it isn't because there is a murderers row in front of him.
How is that 2019 first round looking at the moment? Kupari?
Can we finally get in agreement that it was wrong to act like Blake was the best f***ing GM to ever GM because he traded away real NHL players for picks/prospects and lost on purpose for more high picks? If you don't have a Top 5 rated pool immediately following those drafts, that means you just went way off the board on your picks. You could just go with CSB's rankings with all of your picks from 2017 - '19 and add in the prospects obtained in trades and you'll be ranked Top 5. Now, I agreed with this strategy but the adoration for what he "accomplished" once the pool was rated highly was very GWB on an aircraft carrier.
Did he draft the right guys and will they develop them correctly? That's the real test.