Steve
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2002
- 3,752
- 404
To be fair not many GMs start a job when the teams future is set and they are on the upswing
LolTo be fair not many GMs start a job when the teams future is set and they are on the upswing
Being fair isn’t welcome. Follow the herd to the altar and you’ll be forgiven.To be fair not many GMs start a job when the teams future is set and they are on the upswing
Being fair is fine. Making up false claims to discredit an accomplishment in the first reply, and then blaming others for the thing you brought up being discussed, once you were proven to be completely wrong - not so much.Being fair isn’t welcome.
Right - because you've been "fair" all along. You just don't like being called it for it and proven wrongBeing fair isn’t welcome. Follow the herd to the altar and you’ll be forgiven.
I’ve only ever been fair, you must have me confused with someone else.Right - because you've been "fair" all along. You just don't like being called it for it and proven wrong
To be fair not many GMs start a job when the teams future is set and they are on the upswing
That seems to be a fair assessmentGMs are usually fired for a reason. The team is not going well (see Botteril, Chia, Snow etc.). In the Leafs case, Lou was not fired because the team was not performing, he was simply not rehired and Kyle jumped into his shoes. Anybody who says Kyle did not get a fair handshake when he took over the team is simply in denial.
Amazing in the playoff too!!The Great Marc Bergevin has set the table a few times. Got drunk, pissed himself and passed out at the table a few times too.
Dubas has done a remarkable job thus far.
Amazing in the playoff too!!
GMs are replaced for all sorts of reasons, and countless past GMs have taken over good situations. In the Leaf's case, they had a couple good pieces (like any team), but Dubas did not take over a uniquely favourable situation, and a ton of problems remained. A ton of players needing new contracts, including all of their star players, who were not treated well. A toxic coach that could not be fired, that misused the roster. Multiple anchor contracts, and a 5.3m LTIR contract. A horrible defense that Lou did nothing to fix for years. An offense set to decline from multiple top-9 losses to UFA. A starter that was about to decline substantially. A depleted prospect pool.GMs are usually fired for a reason. The team is not going well (see Botteril, Chia, Snow etc.). In the Leafs case, Lou was not fired because the team was not performing, he was simply not rehired and Kyle jumped into his shoes. Anybody who says Kyle did not get a fair handshake when he took over the team is simply in denial.
GMs are replaced for all sorts of reasons, and countless past GMs have taken over good situations. In the Leaf's case, they had a couple good pieces (like any team), but Dubas did not take over a uniquely favourable situation, and a ton of problems remained. A ton of players needing new contracts, including all of their star players, who were not treated well. A toxic coach that could not be fired, that misused the roster. Multiple anchor contracts, and a 5.3m LTIR contract. A horrible defense that Lou did nothing to fix for years. An offense set to decline from multiple top-9 losses to UFA. A starter that was about to decline substantially. A depleted prospect pool.
Not to mention a global pandemic stagnating the cap after all of the big signings, and all of the injuries that Dubas has had to navigate through.
And on top of all that, unrealistic expectations spread among the uninformed, based on an abnormally inflated and unsustainable point total that did not properly represent where the team was at, even prior to losing pieces.
The overwhelming majority of the roster now is Dubas', and that doesn't even include the ones he had to sign. This is supposed to be a thread celebrating Dubas' accomplishment - an accomplishment that benefits our Leafs, and all some people can do is grumpily make false claims in attempts to discredit it, because of how wrong they personally were about everything. Anybody that says the "table was set" has no idea what they're talking about.
As has already been explained to you multiple times, Marner was not inherited. Also, he had to sign Matthews and Nylander, and part of their increased raw production is a result of Dubas' chosen coach, who had this crazy idea to use them properly. Andersen's "contributions" are also pretty questionable for much of that. You consistently ignore the massive changes Dubas has made, especially to our defense - which is ironic because you are constantly exaggerating how important defense is in every other discussion.** All of this individual inherited player production contributed
Yes, I'm looking at them, and I see some great pieces, wasted largely by bad management. Thank god we have a great GM in Dubas.Just look at Buffalo, Edmonton, NYI, NYR, Minny, Pens (please do not tell me Hextall has it better than Dubas did because he has Crosby and Malkin), Carolina, Arizona, Detroit etc.
He did not take over a sinking ship (few do), but he took over a ship that had a hell of a lot of holes in it. More than many are willing to admit, and it was slowly filling with water before Dubas took over.Dubas did not take over a sinking ship.
Once again the Dubas propaganda machine is out in full force! So Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Hyman, Rielly, Kadri, Kapanen, Johnnson, Andersen were a "couple of good pieces" just like any team?????In the Leaf's case, they had a couple good pieces (like any team), but Dubas did not take over a uniquely favourable situation, and a ton of problems remained.
Once again the Dubas propaganda machine is out in full force! So Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Hyman, Rielly, Kadri, Kapanen, Johnnson, Andersen were a "couple of good pieces" just like any team?????![]()
Yes, I'm looking at them, and I see some great pieces, wasted largely by bad management. Thank god we have a great GM in Dubas.
He did not take over a sinking ship (few do), but he took over a ship that had a hell of a lot of holes in it. More than many are willing to admit, and it was slowly filling with water before Dubas took over.
This has to be one of your most hilarious posts.
"...filling up with water.."?
Lou inherited a 68 point team.
The next year we finished last with 69 (1 point increase).
Following season 95 points and the next a franchise record of 105.
Where exactly was this water you speak of? Not a single season of regression after taking over a stumbling team.
With our new gm:
100 point first season (lost 5 points).
2nd season on pace for 95 points (lost another 5 points)
I think we may have found the water after all rofl
Dubas literally inherited a top 7 team with 2 of the most talented young players in the game who have only gotten better. And yet it has taken until year 3 while playing in a weak north division to finally see some positive results under his leadership.
Lou inherited the best core of elite ELC talent in hockey and pathetically squandered it with horrific signing after horrific signing.