1 year no risk
Actually, he did have a okay relGF% but that's largely because 1) he was clearly the designated puck mover and passer on team which would both leads to higher shooting%, even though he has below average success rate at zone exit in general and statistically speaking his passing ability is bottom tier and 2) being on the good side of luck during lineup changes / special teams exit.Check his WOWYs, he's bad and he makes the players that play with him worse. He's a black hole. GF% is bad when he's on the ice. Sooo I guess it's you who needs to try harder.
It doesn't irritate me.
In fact I'm very happy he's been signed so I don't have to worry about my team signing him. It's just silly to see people saying he's a top 4 when he's clearly not.
I mean, 1 year, 7 years, if he makes the team worse he makes them worse.1 year no risk
Right, didn't remember if it was decent or better than the rest of the team though.Actually, he did have a okay relGF% but that's largely because 1) he was clearly the designated puck mover and passer on team which would both leads to higher shooting%, even though he has below average success rate at zone exit in general and statistically speaking his passing ability is bottom tier and 2) being on the good side of luck during lineup changes / special teams exit.
I legit have no idea what you're talking about here. I'm not back tracking at all.
Uhhh, I answered that question, it's right there in the quote you posted.
Off topic, again, for some reason. Weird.
Is this a serious question? There are plenty of people talking about how he blocks shots as if that makes him a top 4 D man...have you only been reading my posts in this thread or something?
In fact I'm very happy he's been signed so I don't have to worry about my team signing him. It's just silly to see people saying he's a top 4 when he's clearly not.
Played top 4 minutes on a team that went to the 2nd round of the playoffs last year. The problem was that after he was traded to Dallas he was playing #1 minutes which is way too much for him.Many are calling him a top 4 D man, which he is undoubtedly not a top 4 D man.
Ooooooh. Well, try your very best to move on past that then. There's plenty of other ways to show how terrible Russell is if you look for them, HERO charts are just the easiest and most readily available resource.
But hey, that chart shows a bunch of reasons why Russell sucks at least. I haven't seen ANY Oilers fans provide ANY info to show why he's a #4. "But guyz, he getz hit by da puckz lots!" is not an argument for a valuable defenceman, sorry.
He's going to be behindI mean, 1 year, 7 years, if he makes the team worse he makes them worse.
Have you seen Russell play? I would like to know what you are basing your opinion on?
Of course he/she hasn't. Runs to hockeydb and HERO and thinks "I'm a pro scout"Have you seen Russell play? I would like to know what you are basing your opinion on?
Because anything critical about an Oilers player isn't automatically "Oilers hate"...Even if he is only a bottom pair defenseman, 1 year is no risk. The Oilers lost Yakupov today and potentially gained Russell for only 0.6 million more. I don't understand the all the Oilers hate on these threads.
Again, it's cute, but everybody sees it. Pretending you didn't do is simply digging that hole of yours further. You attempted a drive-by and it didn't work. Too bad.
"Plenty of other ways" is now a source or advanced stats website, apparently. Weird- I don't get anything when I go to "plentyofotherways.com".
It's off-topic to determine whether the source you provided is accurate or fair? Okay- that must mean HERO charts are baseless, then.
Again, "plentyofpeople" doesn't appear to be a poster here. You're going to have to try harder than that.
Played top 4 minutes on a team that went to the 2nd round of the playoffs last year. The problem was that after he was traded to Dallas he was playing #1 minutes which is way too much for him.
What do you have?
Can't believe Dallas passed on Hamhuis for this guy just to toss him to the wayside and sign Hamhuis in the offseason anyway. The ultimate crank.
Russell isn't that good... as an Oiler, Star, Flame, Blue, Blue Jacket... It's only a 1-year contract, but he won't make their defence any better when he's in the lineup.
Of course he/she hasn't. Runs to hockeydb and HERO and thinks "I'm a pro scout"
Russell isn't that good... as an Oiler, Star, Flame, Blue, Blue Jacket... It's only a 1-year contract, but he won't make their defence any better when he's in the lineup.
Russell isn't that good... as an Oiler, Star, Flame, Blue, Blue Jacket... It's only a 1-year contract, but he won't make their defence any better when he's in the lineup.
Wisneiwski perhaps.. not much else.The Oilers use cap space that wouldn't have been used otherwise for a bottom pairing guy that upgrades their defense. I don't see why not. Any better options out there for free?