Del Preston
Registered User
- Mar 8, 2013
- 63,171
- 78,956
Further:
So it's structured to give Russell security for four years while being movable for the team. That's okay. I would have preferred just a two year deal but that's not how things work.
And there goes the capspace I was happy to see. Facepalm.
His gap control is terrible....his puck management puts the team in bad situations time and time again. Thats primarily why he has to block so many shots.
The advanced stats support this as well.
But because he is courageous and is better than average at covering for his own continual mistakes this somehow makes him part of the solution.
Very perplexing.
We really need those young cost controllable assets once both Drai and McDavid's contracts kick in
We just added less than a million in cap space...
signing bonus in last year makes it buyout proof
"Awesome"
And there goes the capspace I was happy to see. Facepalm.
Further:
So it's structured to give Russell security for four years while being movable for the team. That's okay. I would have preferred just a two year deal but that's not how things work.
His gap control is terrible....his puck management puts the team in bad situations time and time again. Thats primarily why he has to block so many shots.
The advanced stats support this as well.
But because he is courageous and is better than average at covering for his own continual mistakes this somehow makes him part of the solution.
Very perplexing.
It ain't easy being 5'10 170 lbs defenseman. Not surprised he's had to find his own niche to succeed and be valued in this league.
Funny how much his shot blocking stands out but still gets used against him when there is thousands of variables that go into why that shot is being taken in the first place with 4 other guys on the ice.
Oh wait, he has a signing bonus in Year 4?
Yeah, no, that contract is worse than I was thinking. They'll either buy him out in 2019 or trade him after free agency in 2020.
Oh wait, he has a signing bonus in Year 4?
Yeah, no, that contract is worse than I was thinking. They'll either buy him out in 2019 or trade him after free agency in 2020.
Stuff like this cracks me up. Hey bud! You don't see the game better than McLellan. Do you think he would get ice-time with "terrible gap control" and "bad puck management"? Would the coach and GM have wanted him back?
Seriously for the guys who say bad defenceman did you watch last year? Im sorry, he is solid gets the puck out, good passer, solid positionally. I get you might not like the term but to say he is a bad defenceman open your eyes
Stuff like this cracks me up. Hey bud! You don't see the game better than McLellan. Do you think he would get ice-time with "terrible gap control" and "bad puck management"? Would the coach and GM have wanted him back?
come on, you can do better than that
Huh?
I thought the deal escapable after year 2, but the bonus works in such a way that his deal is going to be unattractive to the poor teams that would like high-cap/low-dollar contracts. They aren't going to want to pay that bonus. So he's only really movable after July 1, 2020.
The point of the signing bonus is to be able to trade a 4AAV cap hit before season 4 and have the team trading for him only owing him 1.5 million.
Seems smart to me.
Oh brother.
Yup....coaches and GMs are always above criticism.
Yeah...sure bud.
The point of the signing bonus is to be able to trade a 4AAV cap hit before season 4 and have the team trading for him only owing him 1.5 million.
Seems smart to me.
Huh?
I thought the deal escapable after year 2, but the bonus works in such a way that his deal is going to be unattractive to the poor teams that would like high-cap/low-dollar contracts. They aren't going to want to pay that bonus. So he's only really movable after July 1, 2020.
Pretty sure it would be the Oilers paying the cash bonus and then trading a 4 million cap hit for only 1.5 million in year 4 salary.
That's my understanding at least. The bonus is included in the salary.