Traded Korpisalo (5 years/20M)

Knave

Registered User
Mar 6, 2007
21,822
2,438
Ottawa
If Talbot looked horrendous, then what did Sogaard look like?

What is this argument? It's Dorion's job to have a Plan A and Plan B, not a Failure A and Failure B.

The Ottawa Senators didn't happen to Pierre Dorion. Pierre Dorion happened to the Ottawa Senators and its playoff hopes. It's his job to impact the team in a positive way. He has failed.
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
Jul 26, 2005
24,166
13,875
Stop deflecting. Dorion has repeatedly brought in failures of goalies while overpaying. I hope Korpisalo works out, I like him. But this attempt to shift the narrative is actually pathetic.
I'm not shifting the narrative. I'm saying that just because he was unsuccessful in finding a good starting goalie doesn't mean he should stop trying to find a good starting goalie.

We paid premium starter money to a guy who’s basically been a backup his whole career

Insane insane insane
$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arogie

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,119
65,434
Ottawa, ON
$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.

That's why all of those other goalies out there are getting paid with term in this off-season.

Everyone is opening their pocket books and blowing wads of cash at goalies for years and years.

Put another way, Korpisalo with his 221 games of NHL experience has earned the most expensive contract today in the entire NHL thus far.
 

DJB

Registered User
Jan 6, 2009
16,540
11,395
twitter.com
I'm not shifting the narrative. I'm saying that just because he was unsuccessful in finding a good starting goalie doesn't mean he should stop trying to find a good starting goalie.


$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.

The term makes it premium starter contract
 

Gil Gunderson

Registered User
May 2, 2007
32,058
18,049
Ottawa, ON
If you’re spending 15 million more than any other goalie for, I’d imagine you likely could have attracted quite a few of the other guys signing
No I need to imagine a hypethetical situation where Dorion’s hands are tied and he has to make the dumbest decision imaginable.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,641
10,556
Montreal, Canada
No thanks. We've been rolling with "nobody" for the past few seasons, and it hasn't worked out.

Dorion is like the average hockey fan that is lulled into name recognition. It's exactly why it was a surprise that Artem Zub was actually a good hockey player

What we need is nobodys who are good at hockey, because they are cheap and can support our young core adequately. But instead, Dorion goes out and burn a big part of the available cap space on a below average goalie
 
Oct 10, 2010
6,329
1,352
If you’re spending 15 million more than any other goalie went for, I’d imagine you likely could have attracted quite a few of the other guys signing
Yeah only common sense

Factor in that it was reported that Korpisalo was on top of Dorions wish list before free agency even started suggests that they didn’t even try for anyone else Joonas was the guy no matter what.

Just goes to show you how out of touch this whole management group really is bunch of buffoons really…
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
Jul 26, 2005
24,166
13,875
I'm just imagining this guy negotiating a mortgage, the bank offers a rate and he counters higher because he believes the BoC will raise rates further.


?????????????????????
What does that have to do with the rates?

In an inflationary market, assets are king. Locking down a potential starting goalie for a longer term means you gain more value in the long run. If the cap goes up $3-4m per year for the next 5 years, that $4m is going to be a much smaller percentage of the total cap. If we have to buy him out for whatever reason, that percentage is going to be even smaller over an even longer horizon.

It's actually a pretty low risk contract.
 

inthewings

Registered User
Jul 26, 2005
5,310
4,678
I bet Dorion is having a good laugh at Carolina today. Only extending Raanta for 1 year and Andersen for 2 when the cap is going up and they presumably could have had both for 5+ year terms. The Hurricane's are playing are playing checkers and Dorion is playing 3D mahjong.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
99,119
65,434
Ottawa, ON
In an inflationary market, assets are king. Locking down a potential starting goalie for a longer term means you gain more value in the long run. If the cap goes up $3-4m per year for the next 5 years, that $4m is going to be a much smaller percentage of the total cap. If we have to buy him out for whatever reason, that percentage is going to be even smaller over an even longer horizon.

It's actually a pretty low risk contract.

A goalie has no value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bileur

Ad

Ad

Ad