swiftwin
★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
- Jul 26, 2005
- 24,166
- 13,875
If Talbot looked horrendous, then what did Sogaard look like?Talbot looked horrendous
If Talbot looked horrendous, then what did Sogaard look like?Talbot looked horrendous
A promising prospect that we draftedIf Talbot looked horrendous, then what did Sogaard look like?
If Talbot looked horrendous, then what did Sogaard look like?
Stop deflecting. Dorion has repeatedly brought in failures of goalies while overpaying. I hope Korpisalo works out, I like him. But this attempt to shift the narrative is actually pathetic.If Talbot looked horrendous, then what did Sogaard look like?
I'm not shifting the narrative. I'm saying that just because he was unsuccessful in finding a good starting goalie doesn't mean he should stop trying to find a good starting goalie.Stop deflecting. Dorion has repeatedly brought in failures of goalies while overpaying. I hope Korpisalo works out, I like him. But this attempt to shift the narrative is actually pathetic.
$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.We paid premium starter money to a guy who’s basically been a backup his whole career
Insane insane insane
$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.
$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.
I'm not shifting the narrative. I'm saying that just because he was unsuccessful in finding a good starting goalie doesn't mean he should stop trying to find a good starting goalie.
$4M is not premium starter money, especially not with the cap about to skyrocket.
No I need to imagine a hypethetical situation where Dorion’s hands are tied and he has to make the dumbest decision imaginable.If you’re spending 15 million more than any other goalie for, I’d imagine you likely could have attracted quite a few of the other guys signing
This contract is shocking.The term is so disappointing. Why not 2-3 years? Surely teams weren't lining up to lock this guy down for half a decade?
No thanks. We've been rolling with "nobody" for the past few seasons, and it hasn't worked out.
Yeah only common senseIf you’re spending 15 million more than any other goalie went for, I’d imagine you likely could have attracted quite a few of the other guys signing
If you look at the other goaltender signings, the Korpisalo one is a conspicuous outlier.I really wouldn't have given him (or almost any goalie) a 5-year deal.
If you look at the other goaltender signings, the Korpisalo one is a conspicuous outlier.
I assume you did not watch the games then.A promising prospect that we drafted
What does that have to do with the rates?I'm just imagining this guy negotiating a mortgage, the bank offers a rate and he counters higher because he believes the BoC will raise rates further.
?????????????????????
In an inflationary market, assets are king. Locking down a potential starting goalie for a longer term means you gain more value in the long run. If the cap goes up $3-4m per year for the next 5 years, that $4m is going to be a much smaller percentage of the total cap. If we have to buy him out for whatever reason, that percentage is going to be even smaller over an even longer horizon.
It's actually a pretty low risk contract.