Regarding Rehkopf getting a chance to play on a contender, this may (arguably) make the most sense. The Mississauga line-up is loaded with 05's and 06's and yet are leading the entire league in the standings. As you said, this team seems to have a good short to medium term future.....and they're doing it with only (2) OA's......and they won again last night - beating Saginaw.
I agree. Potentially acquiring a Rehkopf (05) in this line-up makes a lot of sense.
You obviously have to take the best deal possible in a Rehkopf trade. And it shouldn’t matter divisional rivals or not.
For me, as good a trade it would be for Missy, I have a little apprehension with Ivankovic being the primary asset we get back in a Rehkopf trade.
Over the last 20 years or so, there haven’t been many goalies taken in the 1st round of the OHL draft. Of those goalies, some have been very good. Some just ok. And some bust. I think I got them all in this century.
Ben Goodreau
Liam Herbst
Spencer Martin
Tyson Teichmann
Kevin Baille
Micheal Zador
Dan LaCosta
There’s an amount of risk in dealing for any 16 year old no matter his position. But if we dealt for a forward or D, and he didn’t turn out to be top shelf, we’d still find a spot for him in our lineup if he wasn’t an absolute bust, and held some value.
Reid Valade for example, wasn’t a top shelf 1st rounder. But he was a very useful secondary player in his last two seasons here.
But if we do a Rehkopf to Missy deal and Ivankovic turns out to be just ok or worse by years three and four of his time in this league, we’ll be looking for a better option in net and where will that leave our return in this deal? You can’t find a place further down the lineup for him like you can a skater with a new starter brought in.
Our big deadline sell off in 2009 had us bringing in Brandon Maxwell as the primary. I suppose he was ok as a starter but that’s about it really. More than one scout I talked to said we went to Morrison way too late in that 2011 1st round upset vs Plymouth.
Over the last 20 years in this league, the Memorial Cup host team either had the goalie with top flight numbers as the starter, or traded for the best possible goalie. London traded for Adam Dennis for a reason. We traded for Steve Mason for a reason.
I’d be much more comfortable making a deal with a team where the primary returning player is a forward or D. Give me, in order, deals with Sudbury (F-Taylor), Guelph (D-Beachesne), Saginaw (F-Young), or London (D-Brzustewicz), ahead of a Missy deal. That’s if there are deals to be made with those teams for Rehkopf.
And yes I mentioned London. Don’t think they won’t deal Henry B. This is a staff that traded family for the greater good. No reason to believe he’s off the table in trade talks.