OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 12,059
- 7,818
I believe they are not valuable partly because they were flawed players who our scouts totally missed on and partly because the coaching group this team has have done nothing for them to develop them and help them improve.
Are Pinelli, Schmidt and Valade flawed? Heck yeah. But don’t believe for a second that they wouldn’t be full fledged stars elsewhere. With any trace of development, these are big difference makers. And teams with good coaches may see that and know they can turn them around.
But do they pay based on what the player is showing as his worth or do they pay based on where their ceiling seems to be? That is the problem with Kitchener right now. The team should be performing at a much higher level and when they aren’t, it is a reflection on the quality players they have. If Pinelli were performing ot his potential or what his perceived potential should be, then his trade value creeps into a 2022 1st plus picks. But, he hasn’t shown that. He is probably worth an ok 17 year old and maybe as many as two 2nds and two 3rds max.
With the percenption of so many players being ont he market, it seems to be shaping up as a buyers market. Teams will make their wish lists and will pay for the players on that list. Is Pinelli on more than one or two lists as a primary target? I’m not sure he is right now. That makes it difficult because Kitchener would be negotiating against themselves. Then it gets to the point where if they can’t get what they perceive as fair value, do they trade for whatever the best return is regardless or do they hold out and keep him? I know Suzuki was held out of the market until the last second and Guelph ended up getting him for very little. I fear Pinelli may be set up as the same example.