Value of: Kirill Kaprizov Value (+prospect/draft picks)

keppel146

Registered User
Jun 4, 2010
5,799
690
MinneSOta
Wanted to see what the percieved value of Kap is. He is signed through 2025-26, and has a NMC for 2024-26. It could make sense for the Wild to dangle his name around instead of wasting away KK’s prime.

Untouchables imo are Rossi, Boldy, Faber, Wallstedt, and maybe their 2024 1st. Wild could add to make things work.

The dream would be the 2024 #1OA or other quality young players who could play Center.

What would you guys give up?
 

JRichard

Registered User
Jul 7, 2021
1,963
1,093
Wanted to see what the percieved value of Kap is. He is signed through 2025-26, and has a NMC for 2024-26. It could make sense for the Wild to dangle his name around instead of wasting away KK’s prime.

Untouchables imo are Rossi, Boldy, Faber, Wallstedt, and maybe their 2024 1st. Wild could add to make things work.

The dream would be the 2024 #1OA or other quality young players who could play Center.

What would you guys give up?
Nobody can promise you 1st oa in a lottery setting.
Teams in the basement wont trade with you.

unless you mean you go for the tank yourself for 24 draft.

confused by odd post offering star player.

this Philly fan is really interested in your guy to play with our new guy Michkov.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,547
18,895
Nobody can promise you 1st oa in a lottery setting.
Likely would be a draft day trade

Teams in the basement wont trade with you.
Probably true, but I wonder if Chicago might be interested in speeding things along now that they have Bedard

unless you mean you go for the tank yourself for 24 draft.
That too, but probably not likely to trade him in season

confused by odd post offering star player.
This is a hot topic on the Wild board, because a lot of people think Kaprizov won't re-sign here when his current contract is over, and would rather trade him for stuff than lose him for nothing
 

EK392000

Registered User
Mar 9, 2020
1,209
1,513
Why would you list untouchables when you’re the one offering the player?

Anyway, trading Kaprisov could actually work for the right team. Minnesota has a wave of young players that are playing well and adding a few more (through picks or prospects via trade) could give them a really good core going forward.
 

JRichard

Registered User
Jul 7, 2021
1,963
1,093
Likely would be a draft day trade


Probably true, but I wonder if Chicago might be interested in speeding things along now that they have Bedard


That too, but probably not likely to trade him in season


This is a hot topic on the Wild board, because a lot of people think Kaprizov won't re-sign here when his current contract is over, and would rather trade him for stuff than lose him for nothing
Hope the last part wont happen. Cant have players choose their teams for league balance. Even if sometimes it works good for the team trading away the disgruntled star, a la Lindros.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwvs84

keppel146

Registered User
Jun 4, 2010
5,799
690
MinneSOta
Why would you list untouchables when you’re the one offering the player?

Anyway, trading Kaprisov could actually work for the right team. Minnesota has a wave of young players that are playing well and adding a few more (through picks or prospects via trade) could give them a really good core going forward.
You can still list untouchables when the conversation is around a different player
 

Bond

Registered User
May 10, 2012
4,395
3,322
Yeah. He isn’t returning the 1st overall. Keep dreaming
 

JRichard

Registered User
Jul 7, 2021
1,963
1,093
Kap isn’t getting the 1st overall.
He adds to KK. Short list off the table.
If i’m winning the lottery with a decent team (think NYR, NJ) i consider giving away my 1st oa for KK, another young piece and a future first.
 

JRichard

Registered User
Jul 7, 2021
1,963
1,093
Zero chance.
Maybe worded it wrong. Did not mean a team like NYR or NJ at this point. Meant a team who jumped lots of spots to pick 1st.

pretty decent team with huge injuries ends up with 9th pick but wins lottery.

That would be Buf, Ott as of today.

Buf i could see it.
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,547
18,895
To Seattle for a deal centered around Shane Wright
You have my attention

The only team that can absorb Kaprizov's contract and is in the right spot in their rebuild cycle I think is Anaheim.
I don't love Anaheim as a trade partner because their real top guys (Zegras, McTavish, Carlsson, Mintyukov, Drysdale) are off limits, and I don't think the next group of forwards after that are intriguing enough. I love the job they've done rebuilding though. Lots of good stuff there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beukeboom Fan

Obvious Fabertism

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2009
6,646
4,006
MN
He is playing injured right now and it is not known to what extent. I will not be participating in this further than saying that I think this not worth a single thought. He won't be traded or traded for until he shows a return to form, and then why would the Wild want to move him?
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,608
13,118
South Mountain
Wanted to see what the percieved value of Kap is. He is signed through 2025-26, and has a NMC for 2024-26. It could make sense for the Wild to dangle his name around instead of wasting away KK’s prime.

Untouchables imo are Rossi, Boldy, Faber, Wallstedt, and maybe their 2024 1st. Wild could add to make things work.

The dream would be the 2024 #1OA or other quality young players who could play Center.

What would you guys give up?

Kaprizov’s $9m AAV and two more years remaining makes it very difficult for Minnesota to extract the maximum value for a 2023-24 in season trade. Too many potential bidders for Kaprizov don’t have the space.

If the Wild want to move on from Kaprizov then the time to do so would be the off-season this upcoming June 2024 before his NMC kicks in.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,558
10,580
Nova Scotia
Hi
Kaprizov’s $9m AAV and two more years remaining makes it very difficult for Minnesota to extract the maximum value for a 2023-24 in season trade. Too many potential bidders for Kaprizov don’t have the space.

If the Wild want to move on from Kaprizov then the time to do so would be the off-season this upcoming June before his NMC kicks in.
Would you take a Fiala type deal? Thing that worries me about him is his numbers fall off in playoffs. Most people do. But his fall from 1.1 ppg to 0.5ppg
 

ThePlanet

Registered User
Aug 13, 2008
636
529
San Jose
Likely would be a draft day trade


Probably true, but I wonder if Chicago might be interested in speeding things along now that they have Bedard


That too, but probably not likely to trade him in season


This is a hot topic on the Wild board, because a lot of people think Kaprizov won't re-sign here when his current contract is over, and would rather trade him for stuff than lose him for nothing

This is exactly why a trade proposal like this makes no sense. There isn't a single team with a lottery pick who will give up years of cost and team control for two seasons of Kaprizov. If your fan base honestly thinks he's going to test the market, there's no reason to believe he would be any more loyal to the team who acquires him.
 

Double Dion

Jets fan 28/06/2014
Feb 9, 2011
11,775
4,557
I mean he's a great player, but #1OA? That's a player as good as him most likely but on an entry level pay scale and with 4 times as much team control. Can't imagine a team doing that. When players like him get traded it's usually for a package. Matthew Tkachuk trade would be an example. Kaprizov isn't quite Tkachuk, but that's the type of deal you'd be looking at. Just a different type of asset package.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL

Roshi

Registered User
Feb 7, 2013
2,070
2,078
Finland
Id compare the price to Eichel's, who returned Krebs, Tuch, top 10 protected 1st and a 2nd.

Kap is couple years older than Eichel when the trade happened and dont have as much of term left, but Eichel also had injury problems and a long time lingering battle with demanding a trade to decrease his value.

So

- A young solid prospect, drafted within couple years around middle of the 1st round.
- Young solid roster player, with upside to grow more and a 1st round pedigree.
- Top 10 protected 1st round pick.
- A second round pick


For my Caps this would be equivalent of

- Rasmus Sandin
- Ivan Miroschichenko
- Top 10 protected 1st round pick '24.
- COL 2nd '25

For

- Kaprizov
- 3rd '24

Would I do from Caps view? Honestly not sure. Value wise, yes.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: MNRube

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
24,652
6,019
Alexandria, VA
This is exactly why a trade proposal like this makes no sense. There isn't a single team with a lottery pick who will give up years of cost and team control for two seasons of Kaprizov. If your fan base honestly thinks he's going to test the market, there's no reason to believe he would be any more loyal to the team who acquires him.
I agree.

a t top 10 draft pick at the draft knowing it’s top 10 draft pick just does not happen unless you have a panicking gm.

more likely return is a late 1st, 2nd or prospect, and a decent player making 4M +
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad