PensandCaps
Beddy Tlueger
- May 22, 2015
- 27,842
- 18,282
Huh?To Seattle for a deal centered around Shane Wright
A 19 year old who's nearly a point per game in the AHL is a "disappointment"? Okay dude enjoy getting the standard package of 1-2 conditional late 1sts, a B prospect and a roster player/cap dump aka nothing remotely as valuable as Shane Wright.Huh?
Again, HFB overvaluing draft picks, and pretending that players like Lafreniere, Slafkovsky, Wright, Kakko, Pulju, Patrick, Kotkaniemi and many, many others do not exist. Celebrini looks like a sure thing, and will be off the table, probably Eiserman... we have to wait and see how the others do.
I do agree that Kaprizov will be more attractive to a team who's window is now, and those teams are usually not picking early in the draft.
Trading Kap for middle sixers and/or middle pairing Dman should only be considered if they are secondary pieces to the deal. Centering a deal around a disappointment like Wright would be ridiculous. Can't wait for the next offer "centering" around Turcotte.
Why?You can still list untouchables when the conversation is around a different player
Hasn't looked himself since that Suter cross check.
It was the Stanley flop that he hasn’t recovered from, the Suter cross check didn’t help but it’s his skating right now that is awful comparatively and has been ever since he went out.The Suter’s are going to have quite the legacy in terms of cross checking superstars
If you’re going to nitpick others, at least learn how to spell the star in question’s nameWhy?
You are the one offering up Kaprisov. Offers will be for Kaprisov, not for your untouchable players.
Wasn’t even trying to nitpick. I genuinely did not understand why he would do that. Why would someone make an offer for Kap and one of the untouchables when Kap is Uber valuable on his ownIf you’re going to nitpick others, at least learn how to spell the star in question’s name
Huh?
Again, HFB overvaluing draft picks, and pretending that players like Lafreniere, Slafkovsky, Wright, Kakko, Pulju, Patrick, Kotkaniemi and many, many others do not exist. Celebrini looks like a sure thing, and will be off the table, probably Eiserman... we have to wait and see how the others do.
I do agree that Kaprizov will be more attractive to a team who's window is now, and those teams are usually not picking early in the draft.
Trading Kap for middle sixers and/or middle pairing Dman should only be considered if they are secondary pieces to the deal. Centering a deal around a disappointment like Wright would be ridiculous. Can't wait for the next offer "centering" around Turcotte.
The whole idea was I would add to KK to get the right deal done. But I wouldn’t add any of those players.Wasn’t even trying to nitpick. I genuinely did not understand why he would do that. Why would someone make an offer for Kap and one of the untouchables when Kap is Uber valuable on his own
So you wouldn’t do Wright+Dragicevic+1st for Kap?Huh?
Again, HFB overvaluing draft picks, and pretending that players like Lafreniere, Slafkovsky, Wright, Kakko, Pulju, Patrick, Kotkaniemi and many, many others do not exist. Celebrini looks like a sure thing, and will be off the table, probably Eiserman... we have to wait and see how the others do.
I do agree that Kaprizov will be more attractive to a team who's window is now, and those teams are usually not picking early in the draft.
Trading Kap for middle sixers and/or middle pairing Dman should only be considered if they are secondary pieces to the deal. Centering a deal around a disappointment like Wright would be ridiculous. Can't wait for the next offer "centering" around Turcotte.
Yeah sure I mean Shane Wright is one conversation but don't think the conversation around 1OA in this years draft is realistic. Celebrini is a bit different (so far). That could always change depends on how he does at the WJC and continues in the NCAA.Huh?
Again, HFB overvaluing draft picks, and pretending that players like Lafreniere, Slafkovsky, Wright, Kakko, Pulju, Patrick, Kotkaniemi and many, many others do not exist. Celebrini looks like a sure thing, and will be off the table, probably Eiserman... we have to wait and see how the others do.
I do agree that Kaprizov will be more attractive to a team who's window is now, and those teams are usually not picking early in the draft.
Trading Kap for middle sixers and/or middle pairing Dman should only be considered if they are secondary pieces to the deal. Centering a deal around a disappointment like Wright would be ridiculous. Can't wait for the next offer "centering" around Turcotte.
No, it was before that when Stanley sat on him. They keep saying he's healthy, but I dunno...Hasn't looked himself since that Suter cross check.
No one wants players like Harris and Newhook in return for a player like Kaprizov. Newhook, especially....we've been there, done that. He's just not vg.If Montreal lands around pick #5 again I would consider something around that pick and players like Newhook + Harris but not sure if I'd bite as this summer would probably a year early for them to make any move like that
I think Detroit will regress and be around pick #10 but they've proved to be closer than anticipated, I would watch for them if he is made available
I mean the prize piece in this case is a first rounder somewhere in the 4-7 range, I think it's pretty unreasonable to expect prime assets on top of that. If Kaprizov had 4-5 years left on his deal we'd be talking about much better secondary pieces, but we're talking about two years and I just don't think that garners a top 5 pick + top tier young players.No one wants players like Harris and Newhook in return for a player like Kaprizov. Newhook, especially....we've been there, done that. He's just not vg.
I somewhat agree that Kap and Montreal's window might not line up, but he could be the piece that puts them over the edge. Suzuki and Caufield are nice young forwards, love Guhle, and Reinbacher has vg+ potential.
Eichel's value was way down, he wasn't even playing, and there were doubts that he would be ever be able to play again due to his neck/spine issues. There was also a lot of rumbling about his character, or lack of it, AND he was on an expiring contract.I understand your disappointment, but that's just cap world for ya. Teams for whom Kaprizov would be of highest value (aspiring Cup contenders), normally would not be able to afford him. Trying to clear cap would just create a hole elsewhere.
I think one needs to look back at the similar level trade(s) to anchor the value expectations for possible return. I am looking at Eichel trade. What did Buffalo get? A middle-6 guy (Tuch), a former mid-1st pick already starting to disappoint (Krebs), and a late 1st rounder. I think that's the ballpark return Minny should be expecting, and this is why I think Kaprizov is staying in Minnesota. Guerin set on this course when he signed Kaprizov to the deal, and continued by re-signing Zuccarello, Hartman and Foligno. Not much can be done in the next 2-3 year IMO.
Nikishkin and Jarvis. Call me, you have my number.Jarvis & Morrow from Canes
Eichel's value was way down, he wasn't even playing, and there were doubts that he would be ever be able to play again due to his neck/spine issues. There was also a lot of rumbling about his character, or lack of it, AND he was on an expiring contract.
Kaprizov has none of those issues.
Granted, although Eichel's intrinsic value I think would be higher than Kaprizov's, Eichel being a center. Who else is there though to guide the expectations?
My main point is, the cap greatly tempers the demand for large contract like Kaprizov's, and elevates the value of blue chip prospect assets (top 10 picks), and ELC/bridge contracts. Which is why I am skeptical we will see Kaprizov being moved, and, if he is, the return will not include top-flight prospects or top-10 picks. Just my opinion though.